Bhusungk

This is Bhusungk's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 4)

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by CptViraj were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This submission provides insufficient context for those unfamiliar with the subject matter. Please see the guide to writing better articles for information on how to better format your submission.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Bhusungk/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

CptViraj (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Hello, Bhusungk! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! CptViraj (talk) 16:21, 4 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Article creations

Latest comment: 10 months ago2 comments1 person in discussion

Please stop creating articles such as Minister of B.C Welfare when you have essentially no content and no sources to support the article. This is what Wikipedia:Drafts are for. I'm going to move all of these to draft space where you can work on developing them at your leisure. If you have questions, let me know. Thanks, --Hammersoft (talk) 15:35, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Moves completed to:

--Hammersoft (talk) 15:38, 7 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Kilari Venkata Rosaiah moved to draftspace

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

An article you recently created, Kilari Venkata Rosaiah, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Hughesdarren (talk) 06:25, 21 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

January 2024

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give a page a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Kilari Venkata Rosaiah. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases for registered users, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 04:03, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Regarding deletion of images in statue of social justice

Latest comment: 9 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Dear bhusangk, please add the images to Wikipedia if they are clicked by you, or you are pretty sure that it is not protected by copyright, and try not to delete already present images in the Wikipedia Mr Nerd 96 (talk) 04:30, 22 January 2024 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Venkata Manoj Kumar

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Venkata Manoj Kumar requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Chaotıċ Enby (talk · contribs) 00:37, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

Latest comment: 8 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Bbb23 (talk) 02:05, 11 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:Bhusungk/sandbox

Latest comment: 5 months ago1 comment1 person in discussion

Hello, Bhusungk. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Bhusungk/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.