May 2018 edit

  Hello, I'm Velella. I wanted to let you know that one or more external links you added to Catherine Howard ‎ have been removed because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links. Thank you.  Velella  Velella Talk   18:49, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you insert a spam link, as you did at Anne Neville. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. Favonian (talk) 18:55, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Widr (talk) 20:26, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bexsi (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here There is no reason for you to block me, I have added pages with a lot of information on that particular person. It is not any sort of spam or self promotion. Just take a look and get back to me

Decline reason:

Every single one of your edits included a link to your website or your Youtube channel. We call that conflict of interest spamming and don't allow it. OhNoitsJamie Talk 21:03, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Bexsi (block logactive blocksglobal blocksautoblockscontribsdeleted contribsabuse filter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


UTRS appeal #21476 was submitted on May 09, 2018 21:09:47. This review is now closed.


--UTRSBot (talk) 21:09, 9 May 2018 (UTC)Reply