February 2020 edit

  This is your only warning; if you insert a spam link to Wikipedia again, as you did at Culture of India, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Persistent spammers may have their websites blacklisted, preventing anyone from linking to them from all Wikimedia sites as well as potentially being penalized by search engines. regentspark (comment) 16:01, 28 February 2020 (UTC)Reply

https://s.lifestylesimplify.com edit

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie Talk 13:46, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Unblocked Request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BestContentReviewer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Respected Wikipedia, I mistakenly trying to put one domain link and that domain and my editing account blocked. I am a beginner and still learning. This is the first time I blocked. I requested to Wikipedia admin that please unblocked the domain and my edit account, I will follow and do everything according to Wikipedia policies and try to get away from any kind of bad activity that violates any Wikipedia term and condition. That site owner wants to make a career online through his blog and please don't block that domain for my mistake. Please, give me the first and last chance to follow the rules properly. I promise that I will be always a royal contributor as well as the user. Please unblock my account and domain: lifestylesimplify. I really apologize for all my mistakes which happened by unknowingly and my negligence. Thank you. BestContentReviewer (talk) 16:40, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

You've already had that first and last chance. We're not going to unblock you to advertise on Wikipedia. --jpgordon𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇 17:25, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You were given a final warning in February to stop spamming; you ignored that warning and resumed again here, noting If this edit again then I never contribute in the wiki because of wiki linkback valueless for me. OhNoitsJamie Talk 17:14, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Only Domain Unblocked Request edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BestContentReviewer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Respected Wikipedia Team, I mistakenly trying to put one domain link and that domain blocked by my mistake. I am a beginner and still learning. I requested again to Wikipedia admin that please unblocked the domain only and not my edit account. It will be a punishment to me. That domain should not punishable for my mistake. I am sorry for this kind of bad activity that violates any Wikipedia term and condition. Please unblock the domain only. This way anyone can put their competitor's links here to blocked anyone's domain. To be honest I really apologize for all my mistakes which happened by unknowingly and my negligence. Please accept my request. Thank you. BestContentReviewer (talk) 19:08, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not an unblock request, as you state you no longer asking to be unblocked. Yes, we do prohibit spam links regardless of who is doing the spam. If you are interested in being an individual, general contributor, please tell what you edit about. Otherwise, there is nothing more to be done here. 331dot (talk) 19:55, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I am Sorry! edit

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

BestContentReviewer (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Respected 331dot Sir, Yes! I am still interested in being an individual, general contributor but I am a very newbie and I don't want to spam in the wiki. I need to study more about this. I am a student. Actually I use adblocker in my browser and I forget to see there are any ads or not. That's why I request to unblock that domain which was my mistake. I request to wiki admin community for their trust and support. Trust me I will never do any wrong, just trying to fix my mistake.

Respected Ohnoitsjamie Sir, I am so sorry for my that edit. Actually I can't understand that time why my submission reverting. Now after reading some posts, I understand that what was my mistake. I personally saying to sorry again. Please trust me, I never do any kind of bad activity that violates any Wikipedia term and condition. Someone's domain blocked by my mistake. Please forgive me.

Respected Jpgordon Sir, I already told you that I am a newbie. I have to learn a lot. Actually my intention was not advertising or any kind of promotion. I am sorry for it. Please forgive me. BestContentReviewer (talk) 20:38, 10 March 2020 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

  • Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
  • Read our guide to improving articles.
  • Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
  • If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
      • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 05:40, 11 March 2020 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.