User talk:Bedford/Archive16

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Dravecky in topic DYK for The Hunters of Kentucky

Suggestions for possible new articles edit

While we do disagree in some particulars, I don't want you to think I don't appreciate your value to Wikipedia, the Military History project in general, and the ACW task force in specific. With this in mind, I'd suggest two new pages in your "in the American Civil War" series: Cotton in the American Civil War and Immigrants in the American Civil War. I'm not sure I've captured the intent with the second title, perhaps "Immigration in the American Civil War" would be better, or even another title. It's just that so many non-native-born soldiers participated in the war and there are some notable leaders on both sides (Siegel and Cleburne to name two) which deserve an unified treatment. When thinking about your next new work, please consider the enormous usefulness of at least the first page. BusterD (talk) 14:19, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Greetings, and some Milhist business edit

First, happy new year!

Second, I've raised a couple of things here which could use swift responses. May I trouble you please to check them out?

Thanks! --ROGER DAVIES talk 19:29, 1 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Clark State Forest 3 edit

All done. Congratulations :) Parrot of Doom (talk) 01:44, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Thanks.--Gen. Bedford his Forest 03:46, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Krimpet edit

Hi Bedford. Do you need a hand sorting out the feminists? 194.189.32.65 (talk) 15:20, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Chee kufta edit

Hi, in your new article you use the spelling kufta for this dish. However, Armenian cuisine consistently uses the spelling kiufta (except for your addition of Chee kufta). Could you address the question of these variant spellings -- here or on my talk page? It is obviously desirable to have consistency. Thank you. --Zlerman (talk) 15:42, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Northwest Territory task force? edit

Would you be interested in forming a task force for the Northwest Territory? I've never started one, but I thought we could form up under Wikipedia:WikiProject United States History. The reason I'm considering it is that many of the articles dealing with the NW Territory (or the daughter territories) are dealt with as individual state histories, and I think we could do better if we instead focused on the enormous Indian territory that the new United States inherited after the Revolution. Let me know what you think.Mingusboodle (talk) 17:59, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Under WP US History? Could work. I'd give it a go.--Gen. Bedford his Forest 18:07, 2 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Unless we get more than three guys, it's probably not worth creating a task force. I'll keep you in mind if it ever happens, though. Thanks. Mingusboodle (talk) 03:17, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Harmar Campaign edit

Hey Bedford! If you should have a chance, could you take a look at Harmar Campaign. It could prolly use a Milhist assessment, and also could you comment on the proposed merge. Mingusboodle has been working on it and would like some more input before redirecting articles that have been merged. Charles Edward (Talk) 01:07, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Bounty Jumpers edit

I will look at the data bases that I can access through my institution. Do you have access to an institution now? If not, I would be happy to search for sources to use.Die4Dixie (talk) 04:55, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Good job on the article.Die4Dixie (talk) 08:17, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Thanks. I like Bounty jumper as well.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 08:37, 7 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Signpost updated for November 24, 2008 through January 3, 2009 edit

Three issues have been published since the last deliver: November 24, December 1, and January 3.


 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 4, Issue 45 24 November 2008 About the Signpost

From the editor: 200th issue 
ArbCom elections: Candidate profiles News and notes: Fundraiser, milestones 
Wikipedia in the news Dispatches: Featured article writers — the inside view 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Volume 4, Issue 46 1 December 2008 About the Signpost

ArbCom elections: Elections open Wikipedia in the news 
WikiProject Report: WikiProject Solar System Features and admins 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Volume 5, Issue 1 3 January 2009 About the Signpost

From the editor: Getting back on track 
ArbCom elections: 10 arbitrators appointed Virgin Killer page blocked, unblocked in UK 
Editing statistics show decline in participation Wikipedia drug coverage compared to Medscape, found wanting 
News and notes: Fundraising success and other developments Dispatches: Featured list writers 
Wikipedia in the news WikiProject Report: WikiProject Ice Hockey 
Features and admins The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:42, 3 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter edit

A new newsletter has been released; Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 033.

Delivered: 23:47, 4 January 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)


Worthless comment removed edit

I removed the latest comment from you about Sceptre over on AN.[1]

I don't care if you like Sceptre or not, but keep your comments productive. Snide little commentary? Not so much. EVula // talk // // 05:35, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'd say it was rather productive, as it illustrated a point worth considering.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 05:42, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Do it without being a dick. The "Uhh, remember..." comment earlier in that thread, I thought, was perfectly fine. But the one I removed was just being a dick for the sake of being a dick. EVula // talk // // 05:46, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
There is an essay that addresses calling someone a dick. It has a fancy name, but it eludes me at the moment.`Die4Dixie (talk) 02:34, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
WP:HOOSHBUG? No, that can't be right.Die4Dixie (talk) 07:01, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Exactly where did arbcom clear anything involving you or your user space?--Tznkai (talk) 05:43, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
See here. 'Nuff said.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 05:44, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
ArbCom declined to get involved - although selected quotes such as "Bedford's insistence on using crass language that he knows offends some of his fellow Wikipedians is churlish and reinforces why he is no longer an administrator" and "# Bedford is reminded that such extreme hyperbole reflects mostly on his own character, and that he would be well-advised to redact it himself. " are hardly support. No, I'm sorry to say that while the primary harm may or may not fall on your head with your bad behavior, its very much outside of the point of user space. All things on Wikipedia are a privilege - including the use of "your" userspace - a privilege you are abusing, as you has been pointed out to you repeatedly by many editors. Please stop.--Tznkai (talk) 05:54, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
You stop. I realize you are jealous of me because I, for one, actually try to contribute to Wikipedia. If you don't like it, re-ask ArbCom. They interpreted it for us. Get over yourself.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 06:02, 5 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Terminal Arcade edit

  On January 6, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Terminal Arcade, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

» \ / ( | ) 02:30, 6 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Oops edit

Sorry about that. Of course I copied and pasted... --Rschen7754 (T C) 04:42, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

No problem; I've done that faux pas too.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 04:52, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK copy edit edit

General: I noticed an odd error of phrasing in one of the next DYK tags, but I can't figure out how to edit it (since it's in a template somewhere). It's the one informing us "... that sprint canoer Thomas Zereske's life was dedicated by his former teammate Christian Gille's gold medal at the 2004 Summer Olympics in the C-2 1000 m event?" "Dedicated by" should be "honored by" or "memorialized in," or something similar. I'm posting it on your talk since I know you often work on DYK. Thanks. --Amble (talk) 23:35, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Should be "... that Christian Gille dedicated his 2004 Summer Olympics gold medal to the life of his former teammate, sprint canoer Thomas Zereske?" You'd have to find an admin to change it since it's in the queue.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 23:41, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Yes, but it looks like someone avoided that phrasing in order to put Zereske's name first. Thanks. --Amble (talk) 23:49, 8 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for St. Augustine in the American Civil War edit

  On January 9, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article St. Augustine in the American Civil War, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 11:28, 9 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

The Military history WikiProject Newsletter : Issue XXXIV (December 2008) edit

 
The Military history WikiProject Newsletter: The Bugle
Issue XXXIV (December 2008)
Project news
Articles of note

New featured articles:

  1. 13th Airborne Division (United States)
  2. 2nd Canadian Infantry Division
  3. Action of 13 January 1797
  4. Akutan Zero
  5. AMX-30
  6. Arena Active Protection System
  7. Blair Anderson Wark
  8. British Empire
  9. Frederick III, German Emperor
  10. Phan Dinh Phung
  11. Rheinmetall 120 mm gun
  12. SS Dakotan
  13. SS Washingtonian
  14. Tanks in the Spanish Army

New featured lists:

  1. Timeline of the Adriatic campaign, 1807–1814

New featured topics:

  1. Spanish Tanks

New A-Class articles:

  1. Battle of Salamis
  2. Bruce Kingsbury
  3. Four Freedoms (Norman Rockwell)
  4. George Ingram
  5. Jagdgeschwader 1 (World War II)
  6. John Whittle
  7. Lexington class battlecruiser
  8. Maryland and Virginia Rifle Regiment
  9. SM U-5 (Austria-Hungary)
  10. Tetrarch (tank)
  11. USS Iowa turret explosion
  12. Zanzibar Revolution
Current proposals and discussions
  • Design competition Editors with design skills urgently needed to design an eyecatching logo for this newsletter. The logo needs to incorporate a bugle motif as well as the newsletter's title, "The Bugle". Fame and honour (a barnstar) guaranteed for the successful design. Submit entries here please.
  • Who will be the three "2008 Military historians of the Year"? There are 13 candidates so far and the number is rising rapidly. The winning editors will receive the Gold, Silver and Bronze Wikis; and all other nominees the WikiProject barnstar. To nominate editors you admire, or to cast your votes, please visit here!
  • A new drive has been started to identify the core topics of World War I with the aim of improving their quality before the centenary of the start of World War I in 2014.
  • A discussion is underway regarding flag icons and whether to rewrite the current guidelines to reflect the Manual of Style.
Awards and honors

To stop receiving this newsletter, or to receive it in a different format, please list yourself in the appropriate section here.

This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 01:54, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WP:FILMS Questionnaire edit

As a member of WikiProject Films, you are invited to take part in the project's first questionnaire. It is intended to gauge your participation and views on the project. At the conclusion of the questionnaire, the project's coordinators will use the gathered feedback to find new ways to improve the project and reach out to potential members. The results of the questionnaire will be published in next month's newsletter. If you know of any editors who have edited film articles in the past, please invite them to take part in the questionnaire. Please stop by and take a few minutes to answer the questions so that we can continue to improve our project. Happy editing!
This has been an automated delivery by BrownBot (talk) 02:40, 10 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Chee kufta edit

  On January 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Chee kufta, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

--Dravecky (talk) 01:03, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Battle of Hampton Roads edit

Hi, Bedford. - Thank you for your comments on the article. I want to explain some of my reasoning, and hope to prod you into some more work.

1. I leave the citations in expanded form (that is, repeat the titles, etc.) as something of a convenience for later editors. If someone decides to eliminate, or move, the first citation of a book, he then does not have to revise other citations. I know it is a rather remote likelihood, but it is no inconvenience to me, as I cut and paste from my bibliography.
2. I have not requested peer review for higher status because I do not think it should pass. The text is not stable - I have made sure of that myself. What I hope is that it can soon be put into more or less final form, and then we can settle down and anticipate the final judgment.

If you agree with my reasoning, perhaps you can see where I am leading: This article is probably close to FA quality, and needs only moderate effort to bring it back up there. I have done what I think I can do, and whatever else needs to be done must be done by others. I hope that you are one of those others. - PKKloeppel (talk) 14:59, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Bounty jumper edit

  On January 11, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Bounty jumper, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:39, 11 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

Delivered by The Helpful One for Garden and iMatthew at 00:07, 12 January 2009 (UTC) Reply

Fort Harrison assessment edit

Thanks for lending me your eyes on Battle of Fort Harrison. That was quick! Mingusboodle (talk) 00:38, 12 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Corned beef sandwich edit

Hi. I explained my deletion in corned beef sandwich. It's a digression, as discussed in WP:COATRACK, from the topic of the article that sheds no light on the topic. As such, it warrants deletion. You restored the text without explanation. I'd like to remove it again but I wondered what your rationale was for restoring it. —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:21, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

1) It isn't a coatrack; 2) we had engaged in lenghty debate about it a few months ago, and the result was it was kept, 3) It is the famous moment for that particular dish, and therefore deserved to be mentioned there. Therefore, it stays.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 02:26, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
1) It is a coatrack by the very definition of coatrack. Can you tell one thing that one can learn about corned beef sandwiches from reading that story? 2) The discussion was about deleting the article. 3) It wasn't a famous moment about corned beef sandwiches. It was a possibly famous story that happened to involve a corned beef sandwich. There was nothing about the fact that it was a corned beef sandwich, as opposed to a tuna sandwich or a corned beef empanada or a chocolate eclair, that made any difference in the way the story played out. The bottom line is that three quarters of an article that purports to be about corned beef sandwiches is actually about astronauts misbehaving on a space flight. Doesn't that seem odd? —Largo Plazo (talk) 02:46, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
What needs to happen is adding to the article. It didn't get done before during its AFD, but now should get done. Tomorrow I'll fill it out so that less than 50% of the article is about Gus.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 02:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I mentioned how it's the better part of the article to emphasize my point, but it will still be a coatrack, especially given the amount of detail that was put into explaining the incident. —Largo Plazo (talk) 03:07, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

NRHP edit

I like the pictures! Do you have more for sites not yet in tables? Nyttend (talk) 14:49, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Many of the places in Indiana and Kentucky I took pictures for. There's still some I haven't uploaded yet. I aim to take pictures of all the ones in Bardtsown, Kentucky and downtown Louisville soon.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 14:51, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Sugar pie edit

  On January 13, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Sugar pie, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass (talk) 15:58, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Signpost, January 10, 2009 edit

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 2 10 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes:Flagged Revisions and permissions proposals, hoax, milestones Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: December themed Main Page Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 20:00, 11 January 2009 (UTC)§hepBot (Disable) 18:48, 13 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

War of Northern Aggression edit

This is what they have done with the redirect that they fought for [[2]]. A real travesty, it's ever so much better now.Die4Dixie (talk) 03:21, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yep, they succeeded in dumbing down Wikipedia. For the next few months, the redirect will be retarded, but in a few months I'll fight again for intelligence to prevail and have it go directly to ACW, where anyone with a brain knows it should go.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 04:41, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply


Indiana in the War of 1812 edit

You seem to be off to a very strong start on Indiana in the War of 1812. I'll give it a better look, later, when I'm not on company time. Thanks for the review of Spur's Defeat, by the way. If you'd like another interesting contribution for DYK, I recently found and added something that was too good to pass up:

Did you know that the Siege of Fort Wayne began on 5 September 1812 when Chief Winamac's warriors attacked two soldiers returning from an outhouse? Mingusboodle (talk) 17:13, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

By the way, since we're talking about 1812 articles... can you tell me why the {Indiana history} template defaults to an expanded view in some articles (like Kekionga) but is collapsed in others (like Siege of Fort Wayne)? I prefer the collapsed view, but I can't figure out how to change it. Mingusboodle (talk) 17:28, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
The Indina history template was Charles; I've done nothing on it. The Siege of Fort Wayne hasn't been expanded enough.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 18:48, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I'm working on it. I had added a big section during my lunch break, today, and didn't think to copy my text before clicking "Save." Wouldn't you know it? Wikipedia had a hiccup, and my hour was wasted. Is there anything more frustrating? But anyway... yeah, I'll keep working on it. Mingusboodle (talk) 23:26, 15 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

NRHP in Louisville edit

Are you planning to split out any more cities besides Anchorage? I ask because I really don't feel like renumbering the sites still on the county list if it will need to be done again soon :-) Nyttend (talk) 14:47, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Yes, I'll be splitting more off soon. (I'm trying to get breakfast done). As I'll eventually get the pictures for all these, best to plan ahead and split off cities one by one. Probably Portland next. However, the US Marine Hospital is showing different lat/long on the article page than in the edit page for me. But then, WP is slow for me today.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 14:50, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
No complaints; I'm not saying that you're slow. Thanks for the help — I've never been to Louisville, except for interstate travel, so it's good to have someone who knows what he's doing :-) Nyttend (talk) 15:33, 16 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Paul Dresser Birthplace edit

  On January 17, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Paul Dresser Birthplace, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 11:40, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Kentucky in the War of 1812 edit

Yeah, I might be able to help on that article, but it won't be next week, as I'll be out of town on business with very spotty access to Wikipedia and even spottier access to anything resembling a reliable source. I'll also be juggling a few FA and GA noms, but given the current "molasses in January" rate that those things are going, it shouldn't interfere too much.

Since I did the bulk of the articles on Isaac Shelby (current FA nom), Richard Mentor Johnson (GA), and John Adair (GA), I could probably do some additions regarding the Battle of the Thames and the Battle of New Orleans. Particularly of interest to me is the feud between Adair and Andrew Jackson over the supposed cowardice of some poorly-armed Kentuckians at New Orleans. I think fleshing out that section of Adair's article might be enough to elevate it to FA.

Looks like you've already done a little looking into the Battle of Frenchtown (River Raisin), which was unquestionably of major importance to Kentucky for years to come. Maybe you can continue to flesh this out, and we'll go from there. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 16:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Like you, I am also busy in several things. Still, it's a fun little article to do. You know more about the people involved than I do. If it takes time to do the article, so be it.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 16:15, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Sounds good, then. I'll try to add a few names I know to the template and maybe flesh out a Further reading section in the article so we'll have some place to add good resources as we find them. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 16:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
Ancestry.com has a book entitled Kentucky in the War of 1812 for free viewing. Might be helpful.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 16:21, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Signpost, January 17, 2009 edit

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 3 17 January 2009 About the Signpost

News and notes: New board members, changes at ArbCom Wikipedia in the news 
Dispatches: Featured article writers—the 2008 leaders WikiProject Report: WikiProject Pharmacology 
Features and admins Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News 
The Report on Lengthy Litigation

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 21:12, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delievered by SoxBot II (talk) at 23:17, 17 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiProject Professional wrestling newsletter edit

A new newsletter has been released; Wikipedia:WikiProject Professional wrestling/Newsletter/Issue 034.

Delivered: 10:42, 18 January 2009 (UTC) by MiszaBot (talk)

Ohio in the War of 1812 edit

I might be able to tackle this in a few weeks, but not before. Nice work on the other two articles, Bedford! 8th Ohio Volunteer Infantry (talk) 12:58, 18 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for U.S. Route 31E in Kentucky edit

  On January 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article U.S. Route 31E in Kentucky, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 06:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Coxs Creek, Kentucky edit

  On January 19, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Coxs Creek, Kentucky, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 06:50, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Howdy XXVI edit

Howdy,

I'm back from my Mini-Retirement and I am ready to begin editing and creating articles! WOO HOO!

Lord R. Oliver I His Lordship's Court 21:21, 19 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

WikiCup Newsletter edit

DYK for Cherokee State Park (Kentucky) edit

  On January 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Cherokee State Park (Kentucky), which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 13:40, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kenlake State Resort Park edit

  On January 20, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kenlake State Resort Park, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 13:41, 20 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for New Haven Battlefield Site edit

  On January 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article New Haven Battlefield Site, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 02:00, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Spur's Defeat edit

  On 21 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Spur's Defeat, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 08:11, 21 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Marcus Schrenker edit

  On 22 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Marcus Schrenker, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 02:01, 22 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

An apology edit

We clashed. I laughed at your plight. A small a pathetic reaction. I just wanted to say I am sorry. Though we may not agree on every single little thing, you do good work, and I can let shit go, and try not to hold grudges. So, I hope you can do the same. Have a good day. --IvoShandor (talk) 17:02, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Indiana in the War of 1812 edit

  On January 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Indiana in the War of 1812, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Kentucky in the War of 1812 edit

  On January 23, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Kentucky in the War of 1812, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 18:50, 23 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wickland edit

Thanks for the pics in Charles A. Wickliffe. Looking forward to your article on Wickland. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 01:10, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

I'm just waiting to get the right source info; hopefully by Monday I'll get it.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 01:22, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply
I think The Kentucky Encyclopedia has a short blurb if you have access to it. Acdixon (talk contribs count) 01:56, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Wikipedia Signpost, January 24, 2009 edit

 
The Wikipedia Signpost
Weekly Delivery



Volume 5, Issue 4 24 January 2009 About the Signpost

Jimbo requests that developers turn on Flagged Revisions Report on accessing Wikipedia via mobile devices 
News and notes: New chapters, new jobs, new knight and more Wikipedia in the news: Britannica, Kennedy, Byrd not dead yet 
Dispatches: Reviewing featured picture candidates Features and admins 
Bugs, Repairs, and Internal Operational News The Report on Lengthy Litigation 

Home  |  Archives  |  Newsroom  |  Tip Line  |  Single-Page View Shortcut : WP:POST

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list.--ragesoss (talk) 03:08, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

Delivered by 03:34, 25 January 2009 (UTC) at §hepBot (Disable)

WikiCup Newsletter edit

17:23, 25 January 2009 (UTC)

DYK for Great Saltpetre Cave edit

  On January 25, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Great Saltpetre Cave, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 17:31, 25 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Indiana Rangers edit

  On January 27, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Indiana Rangers, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 04:33, 27 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Marianna Fault edit

  Hello! Your submission of Marianna Fault at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and there still are some issues that may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! I can't find support in any of the sources for the claim that the fault was discovered in January (or precisely on January 21, as the article says). More likely, the work was done over many months and the press release came out in January. --Amble (talk) 07:24, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for Battle of Tipton's Island edit

  On 28 January, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Battle of Tipton's Island, which you recently nominated. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Gatoclass 15:49, 28 January 2009 (UTC)

Wikicup edit

Food for thought: as of the 23:09 Jan 27, 2009 update, in 5 of the 10 pools one contestant has over half the points in the pool.--King Bedford I Seek his grace 23:16, 27 January 2009 (UTC)

Retrieved from "http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Garden/WikiCup"

And in honorary pool K, one honorary contestant has 100% of the points in the pool! Chergles (talk) 15:56, 28 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for The Bold Canadian edit

  On January 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Bold Canadian, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 08:49, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply

DYK for The Hunters of Kentucky edit

  On January 30, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article The Hunters of Kentucky, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Dravecky (talk) 20:41, 30 January 2009 (UTC)Reply