West Coast Spectre Society edit

 

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of West Coast Spectre Society, and it appears to be a substantial copy of http://westcoastspectresociety.com/aboutwcss.htm. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. See our copyright policy for further details.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion of West Coast Spectre Society edit

 

A tag has been placed on West Coast Spectre Society requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a blatant copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. -- Darth Mike  (join the dark side) 04:12, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy because your account is being used only for spam, advertising, or promotion. If you believe this block is unjustified you may contest this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below.

--PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:48, 5 February 2009 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamit (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I am new at this and was just trying to add an article. First I did it wrong (copyright issues0 then I had a website address and was accused of spam. I am not doing that please help. Thanks.

Decline reason:

Please tell us how you will act differently in the future. How can we can be sure you won't create more promotional articles? Can you explain Wikipedia's copyright policy in your own words? (Briefly)..Begin reading WP:COPY to get the idea. EdJohnston (talk) 03:38, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Bamit (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Well I believe I made a mistake by not reading the site content for posting prior to making my first article submission. I will read this evening and my first article will not contain any phone numbers, web site url's or other means of communication. It will be a describing article instead. Thanks. Marcus

Decline reason:

The article you are trying to create does not meet any of our WP:Notability requirements. If you were unblocked and tried to create it again without WP:Reliable sources indicating notability, you'd be reblocked. OhNoitsJamie Talk 15:48, 6 February 2009 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.