User talk:Balablitz/Archive 14

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20

DYK for Divisional Railway Hospital, Golden Rock

On 25 October 2016, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Divisional Railway Hospital, Golden Rock, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that the Divisional Railway Hospital in Golden Rock, Tiruchirappalli, India, is the oldest in its zone? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Divisional Railway Hospital, Golden Rock. You are welcome to check how many page hits the article got while on the front page (here's how, Divisional Railway Hospital, Golden Rock), and it may be added to the statistics page if the total is over 5,000. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:21, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

The 1000 Challenge for Indian cinema

Based on The 10,000 Challenge and within the scope of WikiProject India, a new challenge has been initiated to reach a long-term goal of 1000 article improvements and creations for Indian cinema. Article cleanup and basic referencing improvements, expansions, new articles, DYKs, Good Articles, Featured Articles etc, are all welcome. You and others are invited to participate in this challenge and help Indian cinema in any possible way. If interested, please signup here. Yours truly, Pavanjandhyala (talk) 03:46, 25 October 2016 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia Asian Month!

Hi there! Wikipedia Asian Month is about to start. Here is some information about participating in the event:

1. Please submit your articles via this tool. Click 'log in' at the top-right and OAuth will take care the rest. You can also change the interface language at the top-right.
2. Once you submit an article, the tool will add a template to the article and mark it as needing review by an organizer. You can check your progress using the tool, which includes how many accepted articles you have.
3. Participants who achieve 4 accepted articles will receive a Wikipedia Asian Month postcard. You will receive another special postcard if you achieve 15 accepted articles. The Wikipedian with the highest number of accepted articles on the English Wikipedia will be honored as a "Wikipedia Asian Ambassador", and will receive a signed certificate and additional postcard.
4. If you have any problems accessing or using the tool, you can submit your articles at this page next to your username.
5. If you have any question, you can take a look at our Q&A or post on the WAM talk page.

Best Wishes, Addis Wang
Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:57, 31 October 2016 (UTC)

Orphaned non-free image File:Kaatru Veliyidai-First look.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kaatru Veliyidai-First look.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 19:07, 12 November 2016 (UTC)

Recent edits to Dhilluku_Dhuddu

Hello, I'm Universalrahu. I wanted to let you know that one of your recent reverts to Dhilluku Dhuddu (film) need more explanation. First of all those adjectives are not used to laud or applaud as you mentioned as Wikipuffery the words "impressive opening" is the fact when the film was released and its not too much of lauding as it is the same words as used by the author of the citation. And you may changed as "good opening" as available in reliable source International Business Times if it appears more constructive for you rather than completely deleting. The citation is not in the list of Any "blog" or "blog"-type websites and it is presented by an author Avinash Gopinath. And the expression "the fourth highest grosser in the Tamil film industry on the basis of its huge collection" may be asked for more sources than completely deleting it.The words "which turned a "super-hit" at boxoffice" have reliable source from India Today and you reverted that too.--Universalrahu (talk) 00:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Universalrahu: Before i suggest you something, mind you take a look at WP:PEACOCK and some GA's and FA's of film articles. BTW, Filmibeat is part of Oneindia.in, which is not considered reliable source per WP:ICTF. Even behindwoods.com feature in the same list, and the sources refer only to Chennai collections. And i dont see IB Times or India Today in my revert. See MOS:FILM for more, as ur so-called constructive edits were placed in lead than in appropriate sections. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 08:32, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

I also felt Universalrahu was not neutral in his edit. Kailash29792 (talk) 09:12, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Thanks For Reply! Foremost thing is all expression used in my edit is not owned by me those expressions are as given by the author of the respective websites. Next thing is lead section can include MOS:FILM "milestones or major events in the film's production, reception of the film by critics and audiences, box office grosses and milestones, summary of awards and honors" if your concern was to make constructive you can add a template to clean-up rather than to revert as a whole. I did not say Filmibeat or Behindwoods is an relialble source and if there's need of reliable source you can add a template rather than deleting as a whole. You have also reverted citation from www.thenewsrecorder.com which is not a blog type website.--Universalrahu (talk) 12:47, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

Thenewsrecorder doesn't look reliable either. And if you are citing an author's opinion, it should not look like it is said from your perspective. E.g.: Avinash Gopinath considered it an "impressive" opening. Kailash29792 (talk) 12:54, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

@Kailash29792, i second you. @Universalrahu: Do have a glance at WP:PSTS & WP:ICTF, before adding a source or put-up a query at WT:ICTF, if you are very unsure about the veracity of the source. Also hone your tone while incorporating such type of informations. And finally i still suggest you to thoroughly read GA's and FA's, before you could make constructive edits on Indian film articles.  Thank you very much!. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 14:26, 18 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Balablitz. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

RC Patrol-related Proposals in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey

Greetings Recent Changes Patrollers!

This is a one-time-only message to inform you about technical proposals related to Recent Changes Patrol in the 2016 Community Wishlist Survey that I think you may be interested in reviewing and perhaps even voting for:

1. Adjust number of entries and days at Last unpatrolled
2. Editor-focused central editing dashboard
3. "Hide trusted users" checkbox option on watchlists and related/recent changes (RC) pages
4. Real-Time Recent Changes App for Android
5. Shortcut for patrollers to last changes list

Further, there are more than 20 proposals related to Watchlists in general that you may be interested in reviewing. (and over 260 proposals in all, across many aspects of wikis)

Thank you for your consideration. Please note that voting for proposals continues through December 12, 2016.

Note: You received this message because you have transcluded {{User wikipedia/RC Patrol}} (user box) on your user page. Since this message is "one-time-only" there is no opt out for future mailings.

Best regards, Stevietheman — Delivered: 01:10, 8 December 2016 (UTC)

Issue on Nattatreewarar Temple, Erode Image

@User:Balablitz, the image is completely my own work. I just added the English texts on it through paint. I don't know how could that became controversial. I have the original image (without added texts) also. I took that image in 2013 using my mobile cam. Anyway, I am not an expert in these coding or software techniques. Kindly help in fixing this issue. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Sinsen (talk • contribs) 8:18, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

@Sinsen: Please respond at the file's entry. Do sign at the end of your statements in talk pages. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 11:47, 26 December 2016 (UTC)

Attention needed for WPINDIA

Hello there. The parameter attention-needed of {{WPINDIA}} is unwatched, so you're better off using the regular cleanup message tags. All these features were widely used in, I presume, 2012 when the activity was its peak but declined gradually. Besides what you've added, the rest were done back then and the category members has more or less remained static since; recently, I decided to have it removed from the main project template both didn't want to waste time on something not causing harm. I can tell you from my personal experience that the India Wikiproject now is barely above semi-active. We barely manage to answer posts at WT:INB. Nice work in patrolling India-related articles though. Good day. Ugog Nizdast (talk) 06:56, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

@Ugog Nizdast: Thank you so much for bringing to my attention. I will avoid such things in future. Thanks for your credits too. Am just involved in clean-up of Indian Railways related articles. --βα£α(ᶀᶅᶖᵵᵶ) 22:17, 6 January 2017 (UTC)

Sattam Oru Iruttarai

Hi, it would be very helpful if you could comment here. Kailash29792 (talk) 15:13, 18 January 2017 (UTC)

Archive 10

←

Archive 12

Archive 13

Archive 14

Archive 15

Archive 16

→

Archive 20