B D Kavi

AfC notification: Draft:Bandaru Danaiah Kavi has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Bandaru Danaiah Kavi. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:55, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bandaru Danaiah Kavi (November 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Robert McClenon were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bandaru Danaiah Kavi and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bandaru Danaiah Kavi, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Hello, B D Kavi! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Robert McClenon (talk) 21:57, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Bandaru Danaiah Kavi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.

You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Bandaru Danaiah Kavi, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Train of Knowledge🚆📚 Choo Choo🚂 Chugga Chugga🚉 07:12, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, B D Kavi. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Bandaru Danaiah Kavi, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

• avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
• propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
• disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
• avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
• do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Train of Knowledge🚆📚 Choo Choo🚂 Chugga Chugga🚉 07:13, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bandaru Danaiah Kavi (November 26)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by David.moreno72 was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

David.moreno72 08:09, 26 November 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for advertising or promotion. From your contributions, this seems to be your only purpose.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 19:19, 9 December 2019 (UTC)

Unblock my user

unblock | reason= I didn't do any editings and speedy deletions on my article so why you've blocked my article can you explain me in detail Bandaru Danaiah Kavi 03:06, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Unblock my artilce

(Bandaru Danaiah Kavi 03:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC)) Yeah..

I have attached the external links and the references about my self as promoting, i didn't read the instructions about the links like i have placed in my article. So i just want to remove those links and make it in a good way.

(Bandaru Danaiah Kavi 03:53, 10 December 2019 (UTC))

Unblock my artilce

unblock|reason= I have placed external links and reference links in my article so that's called an promotion and advertising so now i read those instructions clearly and i want to remove those links and placed it properly and make it in a good way. Bandaru Danaiah Kavi 04:09, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

Reason why i have been blocked

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

B D Kavi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I have inserted the external links and reference links to my article, but i didn't read the instructions as per the links inserted to the article, so please give me a chance to get back my account and make it clear my work

Decline reason:

You will not be unblocked to write about yourself. If that is your purpose here, you need to look elsewhere.Yunshui ^雲_水 09:07, 10 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

I do not accept unblock requests via e-mail. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 11:24, 10 December 2019 (UTC)