User talk:Awesome Aasim/Archive 25
 | This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page (new section).
Archive navigation: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20 21, 22, 23, 24, 25 |
 | Press Ctrl+F (Windows) or ⌘ Command+F (Mac) to find a discussion on this page. |
RFA2024 update: no longer accepting new proposals in phase I edit
Hey there! This is to let you know that phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship (RfA) review is now no longer accepting new proposals. Lots of proposals remain open for discussion, and the current round of review looks to be on a good track towards making significant progress towards improving RfA's structure and environment. I'd like to give my heartfelt thanks to everyone who has given us their idea for change to make RfA better, and the same to everyone who has given the necessary feedback to improve those ideas. The following proposals remain open for discussion:
- Proposal 2, initiated by HouseBlaster, provides for the addition of a text box at Wikipedia:Requests for adminship reminding all editors of our policies and enforcement mechanisms around decorum.
- Proposals 3 and 3b, initiated by Barkeep49 and Usedtobecool, respectively, provide for trials of discussion-only periods at RfA. The first would add three extra discussion-only days to the beginning, while the second would convert the first two days to discussion-only.
- Proposal 5, initiated by SilkTork, provides for a trial of RfAs without threaded discussion in the voting sections.
- Proposals 6c and 6d, initiated by BilledMammal, provide for allowing users to be selected as provisional admins for a limited time through various concrete selection criteria and smaller-scale vetting.
- Proposal 7, initiated by Lee Vilenski, provides for the "General discussion" section being broken up with section headings.
- Proposal 9b, initiated by Reaper Eternal, provides for the requirement that allegations of policy violation be substantiated with appropriate links to where the alleged misconduct occured.
- Proposals 12c, 21, and 21b, initiated by City of Silver, Ritchie333, and HouseBlaster, respectively, provide for reducing the discretionary zone, which currently extends from 65% to 75%. The first would reduce it 65%–70%, the second would reduce it to 50%–66%, and the third would reduce it to 60%–70%.
- Proposal 13, initiated by Novem Lingaue, provides for periodic, privately balloted admin elections.
- Proposal 14, initiated by Kusma, provides for the creation of some minimum suffrage requirements to cast a vote.
- Proposals 16 and 16c, initiated by Thebiguglyalien and Soni, respectively, provide for community-based admin desysop procedures. 16 would desysop where consensus is established in favor at the administrators' noticeboard; 16c would allow a petition to force reconfirmation.
- Proposal 16e, initiated by BilledMammal, would extend the recall procedures of 16 to bureaucrats.
- Proposal 17, initiated by SchroCat, provides for "on-call" admins and 'crats to monitor RfAs for decorum.
- Proposal 18, initiated by theleekycauldron, provides for lowering the RfB target from 85% to 75%.
- Proposal 24, initiated by SportingFlyer, provides for a more robust alternate version of the optional candidate poll.
- Proposal 25, initiated by Femke, provides for the requirement that nominees be extended-confirmed in addition to their nominators.
- Proposal 27, initiated by WereSpielChequers, provides for the creation of a training course for admin hopefuls, as well as periodic retraining to keep admins from drifting out of sync with community norms.
- Proposal 28, initiated by HouseBlaster, tightens restrictions on multi-part questions.
To read proposals that were closed as unsuccessful, please see Wikipedia:Requests for adminship/2024 review/Phase I/Closed proposals. You are cordially invited once again to participate in the open discussions; when phase I ends, phase II will review the outcomes of trial proposals and refine the implementation details of other proposals. Another notification will be sent out when this phase begins, likely with the first successful close of a major proposal. Happy editing! theleekycauldron (talk • she/her), via:
MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 10:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)
Regarding Evaluation of Vector 2022 edit
Hi, I've gone through the RfC regarding Vector 2022 and beneath is the list of things that I could come up with. It's mostly either general themes or repeating conversations, or individual comments that attracted a lot of support !votes. It is smaller that I expected; I found that people either loved V22 and didn't have much to say, or hated it and would prefer WMF to scrap it altogether.
- A fix to the general waste of space waste of space, particularly on the sides. This was the main theme through most of question 1, so should be high priority.
- Make the user talk link not hidden by default.
- Add responsive mode on mobile, as a toggle.
- Provide a way to hide a username, possibly through a check box in the Appearance menu.
- A thinner right-side toolbar.
- Fix the poor autocomplete feature of V22's search bar, which doesn't link redirects and often gives nonsensical suggestions.
- There is still a lot of community pushback against V22 altogether, particularly with WMF's conduct when rolling out the skin. The WMF will need to solve this before community adoption of the skin is widespread.
Before I post it, I'd like to have you have a look at it and see if you have any feedback, or anything you think I've missed or should add. JML1148 (talk | contribs) 06:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- Well, you're the closer! :) I am a bit involved so I don't want my participation to skew my result. Awesome Aasim 15:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Your Talk Page Formatting edit
Hey, just as a note, the formatting on your talk page means that all of the messages on it get folded in to the "Learn more about this page" box when using mobile web, rendering it difficult to use. I understand that mobile has issues with talk pages, but yours is the first one I've seen this issue on. If you're already aware of this, feel free to disregard this message. 71.250.69.250 (talk) 15:42, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
- I think that is a mobile issue. I did checks on talk pages like User_talk:Cyberpower678 and it seems any talk page with formatting gets collapsed into "about this page". Will repeat the issue on WP:VPT. Awesome Aasim 15:50, 16 March 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment edit
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 18:31, 23 March 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 March 2024 edit
- Technology report: Millions of readers still seeing broken pages as "temporary" disabling of graph extension nears its second year
- Recent research: "Newcomer Homepage" feature mostly fails to boost new editors
- Traffic report: He rules over everything, on the land called planet Dune
- Humour: Letters from the editors
- Comix: Layout issue
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment edit
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 08:31, 31 March 2024 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – April 2024 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (March 2024).
Administrator changes
Guideline and policy news
- An RfC is open to convert all current and future community discretionary sanctions to (community designated) contentious topics procedure.
Technical news
- The Toolforge Grid Engine services have been shut down after the final migration process from Grid Engine to Kubernetes. (T313405)
Arbitration
- An arbitration case has been opened to look into "the intersection of managing conflict of interest editing with the harassment (outing) policy".
Miscellaneous
- Editors are invited to sign up for The Core Contest, an initiative running from April 15 to May 31, which aims to improve vital and other core articles on Wikipedia.
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment edit
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 22:31, 9 April 2024 (UTC)
Feedback request: All RFCs request for comment edit
You were randomly selected to receive this invitation from the list of Feedback Request Service subscribers. If you'd like not to receive these messages any more, you can opt out at any time by removing your name. Message delivered to you with love by Yapperbot :) | Is this wrong? Contact my bot operator. | Sent at 20:30, 13 April 2024 (UTC)
EMS edit
Hi, Awesome Aasim! Thanks a lot for creating the Shindo module. I would ask for an advice: the official number is a range (EMS intensity VIII–IX),[1] but there seems to be no option to enter a range or a substitute text with this module. What can be done about that? --TadejM my talk 12:03, 24 April 2024 (UTC)
Hello, Awesome Aasim,
Please be careful when editing a template. The edit you made here introduced errors, emptying out a reliable maintenance category. Your edit has been correctly reverted but please do not make changes on templates that are transcluded and can cause a cascade of problems that other editors then have to fix. It is much better for you to create a new template than alter a template that is currently in use. Thank you. Liz Read! Talk! 00:43, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
- Hi @Liz, I checked the transclusion count and the template is used in only a small number of pages. I know what mistake has happened, and how to avoid it in the future. Usually I am very careful because I do not want a repeat of Wikipedia:Village_stocks#Trappist_the_monk_for_the_Citation_Needed_award. This particular template is transcluded on only a few hundred pages.
- In fact, I am thinking about module-ifying this and similar templates as well for ease of use. Anyway, lesson learned. Awesome Aasim 01:14, 25 April 2024 (UTC)
The Signpost: 25 April 2024 edit
- In the media: Censorship and wikiwashing looming over RuWiki, edit wars over San Francisco politics and another wikirace on live TV
- News and notes: A sigh of relief for open access as Italy makes a slight U-turn on their cultural heritage reproduction law
- WikiConference report: WikiConference North America 2023 in Toronto recap
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Newspapers (Not WP:NOTNEWS)
- Recent research: New survey of over 100,000 Wikipedia users
- Traffic report: O.J., cricket and a three body problem
Administrators' newsletter – May 2024 edit
News and updates for administrators from the past month (April 2024).
Guideline and policy news
- Phase I of the 2024 requests for adminship review has concluded. Several proposals have passed outright and will proceed to implementation, including creating a discussion-only period (3b) and administrator elections (13) on a trial basis. Other successful proposals, such as creating a reminder of civility norms (2), will undergo further refinement in Phase II. Proposals passed on a trial basis will be discussed in Phase II, after their trials conclude. Further details on specific proposals can be found in the full report.
Technical news
- Partial action blocks are now in effect on the English Wikipedia. This means that administrators have the ability to restrict users from certain actions, including uploading files, moving pages and files, creating new pages, and sending thanks. T280531
Arbitration
- The arbitration case Conflict of interest management has been closed.
Miscellaneous
- This may be a good time to reach out to potential nominees to ask if they would consider an RfA.
- A New Pages Patrol backlog drive is happening in May 2024 to reduce the number of unreviewed articles in the new pages feed. Currently, there is a backlog of over 15,000 articles awaiting review. Sign up here to participate!
- Voting for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) election is open until 9 May 2024. Read the voting page on Meta-Wiki and cast your vote here!