March 2022

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. signed, Willondon (talk) 16:53, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

I just wanted to tell people that rye bread MAKES GOOD TOAST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 16:58, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
It's disruptive. Nobody needs to hear from Wikipedia that rye bread makes good toast. signed, Willondon (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
i am very sorry AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 18:39, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. signed, Willondon (talk) 17:41, 22 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Theroadislong was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Theroadislong (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, AwesomeAlex261! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Theroadislong (talk) 15:37, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (March 23)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Bonadea was: This submission is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: This is a personal reflection on the goodness of cookies, from an American perspective; it is not an encyclopaedia article, and nothing in this text would belong in the existing article Cookie either.
bonadea contributions talk 17:14, 23 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding User:AwesomeAlex261/sandbox

edit

  Hello, AwesomeAlex261. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:AwesomeAlex261/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 18:01, 23 August 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your draft article, User:AwesomeAlex261/sandbox

edit
 

Hello, AwesomeAlex261. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! Hey man im josh (talk) 19:23, 23 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

September 2022

edit

  Hello, I'm Greyjoy. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Rye have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Greyjoy talk 11:44, 29 September 2022 (UTC)Reply

October 2022

edit
 
You have been blocked indefinitely from editing because it appears that you are not here to build an encyclopedia.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 12:28, 1 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
please nooooooooo AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 15:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 15:21, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Please i promise not to vandalize again

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AwesomeAlex261 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I know that what i did was wrong and i promise not to do nonconstructive things on Wikipedia again. i am very sorry. If there is anything I can do to help my benefits please reply to this.

Thank you -AwesomeAlex261

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate and confirm that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:

    1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
    2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
      • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}}),
      • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]),
      • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]),
      • and do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
    3. Click edit at your talk page and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
    4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
    5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include any citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
  • Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
  • When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking using {{unblock}} and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
    • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will hopefully improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. 331dot (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

What edits do you wish to make? Please give an example. 331dot (talk) 15:30, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

yes i do wish to make edits I have been adding units of measurements like i did on a article about spaceships and even adding stuff like i did on the article about Fowler's snake eel. I promise my future edits would be like these, Constructive edits. AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 15:38, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
The Fowler's edit was removed, likely due to being unsourced. You will need to show an understanding of sourcing requirements. 331dot (talk) 15:47, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
i added below AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 15:12, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
i added below AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 15:33, 5 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Tbilisi International Airport

edit

February 2007 saw the completion of a US$90.5 million (or 90.6 million Euros) reconstruction project, with the construction of a new international Airport terminal, a car park, improvements to the apron, Taxiway and Runway and the acquisition of ground handling equipment and an annual passenger capacity of 2.8 million. A rail link to the city centre was constructed, with an infrequent rail service of two trains per day each way. The airport got a contemporary and functional design, to provide an optimized flow of both passengers and luggage (also known as Baggage) from the parking lot to the planes, with a 25,000 m2 (270,000 sq ft)


Copied content from exact Name of Article; see that article's history for attribution. AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 16:15, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

i did what the article said
this is the updated version AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 16:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
{{unblock}} AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 16:16, 4 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

I saw the thing above, I followed the instructions and I am still very sorry

edit

Tbilisi International Airport[edit source]

edit

February 2007 saw the completion of a US$90.5 million (or 90.6 million Euros) reconstruction project, with the construction of a new international Airport terminal, a car park, improvements to the apron, Taxiway and Runway and the acquisition of ground handling equipment and an annual passenger capacity of 2.8 million. A rail link to the city centre was constructed, with an infrequent rail service of two trains per day each way. The airport got a contemporary and functional design, to provide an optimized flow of both passengers and luggage (also known as Baggage) from the parking lot to the planes, with a 25,000 m2 (270,000 sq ft)

AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Copied content from exact Name of Article; see that article's history for attribution. AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 18:30, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
{{unblock}} AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 18:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

splay of a default reason, explaining why the request was declined.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AwesomeAlex261 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Your reason here Above, I put down what you asked me to, I added citations and added mesurements. i just asked for this unblockment so this would come to your attention -Thank you AwesomeAlex261

Decline reason:

You clearly didn't come close to following the instructions above. Yamla (talk) 18:42, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

. AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 18:35, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

please can you tell me what I did wrong?

edit

. AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 19:36, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

some of this did not make sense to me AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 19:37, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply
im confused AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 19:40, 10 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

im sorry

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AwesomeAlex261 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I'm very sorry for what I did, the directions above a few posts don't make sense to me so I tried to follow them to the best of my ability. I'm just going though a tough time right now with the loss of my grandma and being banned from editing on Wikipedia. if your reading this please put a simplified version of what i can do below AwesomeAlex261 (talk) 19:53, 10 October 2022 (UTC)AwesomeAlex261Reply

Decline reason:


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Sock blocked

edit

FYI User talk:A1ex26 was just blocked as a reincarnation of AwesomeAlex261. TimTempleton (talk) (cont) 18:31, 14 October 2022 (UTC)Reply