AvatarYoshi

December 2019

Hello, I'm Interstellarity. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Saori Hayami—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Interstellarity (talk) 19:06, 6 December 2019 (UTC)

Are you the user BasedAtlas?

Because if you are, it's really not inconspicuous. You're editing the same exact topic areas they were. Either way, in future, please don't jump to where someone stopped updating information right after them so you can do it before them. You copied the exact reference I was using as well. Format it yourself, don't copy me. Thanks. Ss112 02:38, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Yep, it's basically confirmed you are them by looking at your interests. Well, what I said to you on your previous account stands: If you keep trying to update chart positions or data before me, I will revert you if you get it wrong or try it differently because I'm here every week. I'm not going anywhere, unlike you claiming you were. When users like you say they'll stay away from Wikipedia or diva quit, they never actually leave. They just try to evade scrutiny but still can't stay away. Utterly predictable. Ss112 02:41, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

You can keep editing without responding to me if you like. I know who you are, and you're not escaping scrutiny by registering with a new account. Ss112 02:49, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

December 2019

Please do not add or change content, as you did at BoA discography, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Ss112 02:52, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Ryoka Yuzuki. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 05:45, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Minami Takahashi (voice actress). Ss112 17:58, 12 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: AO, can you please either give a final warning to this user or block them? Using this and their old account BasedAtlas, they have been adding unsourced entries to anime and voice actor articles since 2017. They added improperly formatted and unsourced Korean chart entries on their old account, which is how I found out about them and after diva quitting on that account because I said I would be monitoring them, they said I would not see them again. Instead, they have tried to escape scrutiny using this account and over the past few days I have been monitoring them here. The amount of unsourced information they add daily is getting ridiculous. Just in the last few hours: [1], [2], [3], [4], [5], [6], [7]. Granted, they do source some of their edits, but not even most. I reported them to ANV last night my time, but an admin told me if I had sockpuppetry concerns to take them to SPI, even though that was not the gist of my report. This has been going on since 2017; my personal thought is they need either a final warning or block but I'll leave it up to you. Ss112 17:08, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 36 hours for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 19:44, 13 December 2019 (UTC)

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on Seiichirō Yamashita. This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 19:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: Straight back to unsourced edits after their block expired: [8], [9], [10], [11]... Ss112 19:15, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 20:43, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

AvatarYoshi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I am responding due to my block in Wikipedia. I do not mean any harm for my content. The page that you marked me for not sourcing was an honest mistake. I only followed the formatting of the page since none of the entries on that page were sourced before hand. For months, I was able to get away with this beforehand, before you decided to blocked me the first time. For this point on, I will source all of my entries that I mark on Wikipedia. And yes, I claim responsibility for editing some Korean charts on my own premise before the user Ss112 did, and I will pledge myself that I will no longer claim a stakehold at attempting to edit those anymore. I hope that you can accept my forgiveness.

Decline reason:

This unblock request has been declined due to your history of vandalism and/or disruption to this encyclopedia. However, we are willing to give you another chance provided that you can earn back the trust of the Wikipedia community. To be unblocked you need to demonstrate that you are willing and able to contribute positively to Wikipedia. You can do this by:

• Familiarizing yourself with our basic rules.
• Read our guide to improving articles.
• Pick any pre-existing article you wish to improve.
• If you have trouble choosing an article to improve, see this index of articles needing improvement for ideas. Once you have decided on the article you will propose improvements to:
  1. Click the Edit tab at the top of that article;
  2. Copy the portion of the prose from that article that you will be proposing changes to. However:
     • do not copy the "infobox" from the start of the article (i.e., markup like this: {{infobox name|...}});
     • do not copy any image placement code (i.e., markup like this: [[File:Name.jpg|thumb|caption]]);
     • do not copy the page's categories from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: [[Category:Name]]);
     • do not copy the stub tag (if there) from the bottom of the page (i.e., markup like this: {{Foo stub}});
  3. Click edit at your talk page, and paste at the bottom under a new section header (like this: == [[Article title]] ==) the copied content but do not save yet;
  4. Place your cursor in the edit summary box and paste there an edit summary in the following form which specifies the name of the article you copied from and links to it (this is required for mandatory copyright attribution): "Copied content from [[exact Name of Article]]; see that article's history for attribution."
  5. You can now save the page. However, if your edits will include citations to reliable sources (which they should), add the following template to the end of your prose: {{reflist-talk}}. Once you have added the template, click Publish changes.
• Now, edit that content. Propose significant and well researched improvements by editing the selected portion of the article. Please note that we are not looking for basic typo corrections, or small unreferenced additions; your edits should be substantial, and reflect relevant policies.
• When you are done with your work, re-request unblocking and an administrator will review your proposed edits.
  • If we (including the original blocking admin) are convinced that your proposed edits will improve Wikipedia as an encyclopedia, you will be unblocked.

If you need help while working with your proposed edits, you may add "{{Help me|your question here ~~~~}}" to your talk page. Thank you. Yamla (talk) 23:06, 15 December 2019 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

AvatarYoshi (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Hello, I am re-appealing my block. I read all the rules and guidelines for Wikipedia editing and have chosen an already existing article to update and refurbish. The article I chose to edit was Kiratto Pri Chan, and I basically added information about the announcements and air dates for the anime, all of them sourced. This is because the page requested that more citations would be added. You can take a look to see. Keep in mind, my true purpose here is to only update upcoming content surrounding anime, and I was never intending to spread false or fake information about anything in particular. I hope that you understand.

Accept reason:

With blocking admin's consent. Note that we expect all your future edits to be well-sourced, and we expect you to engage in discussion with other editors. Welcome back! Yamla (talk) 18:08, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: What are your thoughts here? AvatarYoshi has jumped through the 2nd chance hoops, I think. --Yamla (talk) 17:07, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

@Yamla: I'd go ahead and give them some WP:ROPE. But AvatarYoshi you need to understand that this is pretty much your last chance. I don't know if your past issues were deliberate disruption or a lack of basic competency, and I don't especially care. If Yamla chooses to unblock you, you will be on zero tolerance/no warning probation for a while. Any further disruptive editing of any kind and you will be immediately reblocked and I will oppose any further unblock requests. -Ad Orientem (talk) 17:54, 19 December 2019 (UTC)

January 2020

Please stop adding unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did on SF9 (band). This violates Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Ss112 01:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

@Ad Orientem: Just a heads up that this user is back adding unsourced material, for example here... Ss112 01:46, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Sorry about that. I was only intending to add the title track of the new album, but apparently, according to you, that isn't allowed. I have understood the guidelines, and I will make sure it won't happen again.

It's not "according to" me, it's per WP:V. It would be fine if the song had a chart position included after it charted on the singles chart (Gaon Digital Chart), as I've just added because the charts have refreshed, but at the time you added it, there was no source anywhere to support it being there. Especially if you're adding an album or EP that has just been released and inserting its lead single along with it, it will need a source. That being said, thank you for acknowledging the guidelines and that you need to source material you add. Ss112 02:29, 16 January 2020 (UTC)

Please Explain

What are your sources for these edits? [12] [13] -Ad Orientem (talk) 03:04, 30 January 2020 (UTC)

January 2020

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistently adding unsourced or poorly sourced content.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Ad Orientem (talk) 00:53, 31 January 2020 (UTC)