Ashwinr

a bit late, but-

Welcome!

Hello, Ashwinr, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page
• Help pages
• Tutorial
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 

you might be interested in checking out the WikiProject Psychedelics, Dissociatives and Deliriants and/or WikiProject Drugs, judging by your edits.

--Heah ^talk 21:48, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

thanks, btw for the Dale Pendell article. Glad it wasn't deleted; i didn't even know it existed until today. It's been on my "articles i need to write" list for some time, but that list only exists in my head so doesn't remain very stable, and i don't work on it much anyways . . . --Heah ^talk 22:20, 14 January 2006 (UTC)

Re: User Page

Thanks, yeah, go ahead :) — FireFox ^(talk) _{14:44, 03 August '06}

---

I removed a bit of vandalism from your profile. Zorath 20:02, 3 August 2006 (UTC)

waterboarding

Good work there. Dogru144 00:00, 21 July 2007 (UTC)

Articles for deletion nomination of Christwire

I have nominated Christwire, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Christwire. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. Kansan (talk) 20:41, 26 August 2010 (UTC)

2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of 2011 United Nations Climate Change Conference, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: 2011 United Nations Climate change Conference. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.

It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:05, 10 February 2011 (UTC)

Marshall B. Webb

Hellow Ashwinr, I fixed the article up some more, which I will be adding a picture to the article soon. So, have a nice day today.SaysWhoWhatWhenWhereWhyHow? (talk) 18:51, 3 May 2011 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bryan Cogman

The article Bryan Cogman has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

His writing roles are relatively minor and do not show notability per WP:CREATIVE.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. West Eddy (talk) 04:51, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 29

Hi. When you recently edited Bryan Cogman, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Game of Thrones (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:24, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Nomination of Bryan Cogman for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Bryan Cogman is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bryan Cogman until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. West Eddy (talk) 13:56, 29 April 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for September 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Grammy Award, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gramophone (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:01, 26 September 2012 (UTC)

Orson Scott Card

Hi, I happened across the edits you made to this article, and they seem to violate Wikipedia's policy on the Biographies of Living Persons. Calling someone an outspoken homophobe and bigot in the Lead sentence is inappropriate for Wikipedia. ~Adjwilley (talk) 20:29, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

I'm afraid I don't see anything in the policy that my edit violates. OSC's homophobia and anti-gay bigotry is one of his principal characteristics, and is responsible for much of his continued notability. Care to point me to some language that specifies what I've violated?

I'm reinstating my edit.Ashwinr (talk) 20:49, 15 July 2013 (UTC)

The same question came up in September of 2011, and the consensus then was what Adjwilley has stated. Millernumber1 (talk) 15:42, 16 July 2013 (UTC)

Well let's have the discussion again then. If him being a "columnist" is notable and verifiable, then him being an outspoken homophobe is too. That's one of the main things he's known for now, and deserves to be in the first sentence of his biography. None of you can apparently cite any language in the BLP that my edit actually violates, you merely assert that it violates it.Ashwinr (talk) 09:00, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

If you're looking for something in the BLP policy that says "you can't call someone a homophobe" you won't find it. The policy itself, however, is written to prevent that kind of unattributed name calling. Yes, there are sources calling him a homophobe, but there is no consensus in the sources, and the ones I've seen calling him that generally aren't the best sources in terms of POV. For us to call somebody homophobic in Wikipedia's voice in the first sentence of the Lead, there would have to be almost unanimous consensus in the sources to the point of it not being controversial at all. Even then, we would probably still use a more encyclopedic term like "anti-gay" or something.

As for the laundry list of hats in the 1st sentence, I'm all for dropping it. He's most notable as being the author of the Enders' game series. Columnist, teacher, critic, activist, Sox fan, and whatnot are all secondary. ~Adjwilley (talk) 18:13, 17 July 2013 (UTC)

Also, if you are logging out to make edits like this and this, I suggest you stop. (If the logging out was accidental I suggest you be more careful.) It makes people nervous when an IP with very few contributions shows up in the middle of an edit war to revert in your favor. I'm not asking you to confirm or deny whether it is you, just asking that if it is you, to stop or be more careful. The relevant policy is here if you're interested. ~Adjwilley (talk) 04:43, 18 July 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Dale Pendell for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dale Pendell is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dale Pendell (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MelanieN (talk) 23:34, 24 August 2013 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:02, 23 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ashwinr. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ashwinr. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

September 2018

This is your only warning; if you add defamatory content to Wikipedia again, as you did at Brett Kavanaugh, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Bbb23 (talk) 20:25, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

I'll second that. It's no fun responding to angry readers writing into Wikipedia explaining that they don't intend to contribute to this project because we permit language such as that. Even though it only lasted three minutes, it brought disrepute to this project.--S Philbrick(Talk) 23:44, 27 September 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ashwinr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ashwinr. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:21, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Working: What We Do All Day (TV series) moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Working: What We Do All Day (TV series). Unfortunately, it is not ready for publishing because it needs more sources to establish notability. Your article is now a draft where you can improve it undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ASUKITE 19:51, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Hi, as an FYI, I redirected that to Draft:Working: What We Do All Day, which is a more complete draft for the same topic, after trying to remove the (TV series) from the title and realizing we already had a draft. I've edited it so it should be available for another 6 months in case you find sources (IMDB unfortunately does not count toward notability) - see WP:GNG for the types of sources we need for this. Thanks! ASUKITE 19:59, 12 July 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Working: What We Do All Day has been accepted

Working: What We Do All Day, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

97198 (talk) 10:40, 16 July 2023 (UTC)

Jacques Fonlupt-Espéraber moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Jacques Fonlupt-Espéraber. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. CycloneYoris ^talk! 09:30, 12 November 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:23, 28 November 2023 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Jacques Fonlupt-Espéraber has been accepted

Jacques Fonlupt-Espéraber, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. It is commonplace for new articles to start out as stubs and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .

Thanks again, and happy editing!

asilvering (talk) 03:42, 7 April 2024 (UTC)