February 2023

edit
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Arabiapowaa (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

this is orwellian. I do constructive suggestions on a discussion page of a page that has been clearly weaponized and the message is erased. How a contribution to a discussion page could justify this behavior ? From what I see several accounts and numerous contributions have been dealt with the same way although it was established they were not Sockpuppets. Have you even tried to check the sources and understant what is actually contentious on the page before savagely intervening ? Arabiapowaa (talk) 01:49, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Not enough information to take action here. Please give the specific diffs showing that other accounts were established as definitely not sockpuppets but blocked as sockpuppets anyway. Furthermore, you need to establish how you know this and why you were editing that page. Are you collaborating with people off-wiki to discuss these concerns prior to editing Wikipedia? If so, where? Yamla (talk) 11:21, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

PS: rhe discussion page mentioned is the one of [Juan Branco]. Arabiapowaa (talk) 02:01, 24 February 2023 (UTC)Reply

And here is the posted message thzt was litterally censored (erased + blocked). Good luck to find any wp violation (if not on the original page Arabiapowaa (talk)Bbb23)