Anne bremner

October 2011

Hello Anne bremner. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anne Bremner, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. It is not appropriate for you to simply delete well-sourced content [1][2][3][4] or add in unsourced puffery [5]. Wikipedia is intended to be a neutral record of your career including its ups and downs, not your personal homepage where you can hide everything less than perfect and add in glowing lists of awards and victories of which no media sources have bothered to take note.

Edits like [6]or [7] are fine if you provide third-party sources.

As I already requested on User talk:67.88.223.57 (which seems to be the IP address of your employer), if you have concerns about the presentation of the material on the page, leave a message at Talk:Anne Bremner. cab (call) 02:56, 8 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Anne bremner and welcome to Wikipedia. Your editing pattern indicates that you may be using multiple accounts or coordinating editing with people outside Wikipedia. Our policy on multiple accounts usually does not allow this. If you operate multiple accounts directly or with the help of another person, please remember to disclose these connections. cab (call) 03:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Anne Bremner, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear constructive, and has been reverted. Please make use of the sandbox if you'd like to experiment with test edits. Thank you. cab (call) 03:12, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Hello Anne bremner. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anne Bremner, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

1. editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
2. participating in deletion discussions about articles related to you, your organization or its competitors; and
3. linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. SpecMode (talk) 07:52, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

Your recent edits seem to have the appearance of edit warring after a review of the reverts you have made on Anne Bremner. Users are expected to collaborate and discuss with others and avoid editing disruptively.

Please be particularly aware, the three-revert rule states that:

1. Making more than three reversions on a single page within a 24-hour period is almost always grounds for an immediate block.
2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss the changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. --Demiurge1000 (talk) 08:01, 9 October 2011 (UTC)

This is your last warning. The next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia, as you did at Anne Bremner, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Once again, it is strongly recommended that you discuss the matter on the article's talk page; the appearance of an obvious conflict of interest is likely to result in the continued reversion of any future edits to this article from your account. SpecMode (talk) 04:18, 14 October 2011 (UTC)

Short sanity break

OK, hold up. The bit above about being a "last warning" is definitely jumping way ahead in the disciplinary process here. Two edits in 8 minutes (probably before you even had a chance to see the first warning) does not equal more than 3 edits in 24 hours, which is what the 3RR policy is supposed to cover.

We know you think that part of the article about yourself has some information that is there to be hateful and want it removed. I would agree with you that some of the edits seem intended to strike out at your personally, probably from someone who is an Amanda Knox hater. I also agree, and have said so on the talk page in question, that it should be removed.

The problem is that you cannot remove information about yourself, and when you try it just gives ammunition to people who want to say bad things about you to try to say more. "Blocked from Wikipedia for trying to hide information about herself" is not something you want them to be able to say.

Give me a chance to clear this up. DreamGuy (talk) 19:35, 16 October 2011 (UTC)

June 2012

Hello, Anne bremner. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Anne Bremner, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

• Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
• Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
• Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
• Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Your addition to Anne Bremner has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. If you are the copyright holder, please read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for more information on uploading your material to Wikipedia. For legal reasons, Wikipedia cannot accept copyrighted text, or images borrowed from other websites, or printed material without a verifiable license; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites or publications as a source of information, but not as a source of article content, such as sentences or images—you must write using your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --Bbb23 (talk) 01:10, 17 June 2012 (UTC)