User talk:Ambrosia10/Archive 1
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Ambrosia10. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | → | Archive 5 |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Draft:Charlotte Cortlandt Ellis (June 3)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Charlotte Cortlandt Ellis.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Hello! Ambrosia10,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!
|
Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!
- Hi ! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.
-- 06:03, Wednesday, November 6, 2024 (UTC)
Mission 1 | Mission 2 | Mission 3 | Mission 4 | Mission 5 | Mission 6 | Mission 7 |
Say Hello to the World | An Invitation to Earth | Small Changes, Big Impact | The Neutral Point of View | The Veil of Verifiability | The Civility Code | Looking Good Together |
Your submission at Articles for creation: Charlotte Cortlandt Ellis (June 4)
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Draft:Charlotte Cortlandt Ellis.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the .
contributions to Wikipedia!
- Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at AfC Charlotte Cortlandt Ellis was accepted
The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
TheQ Editor (Talk) 03:00, 5 June 2014 (UTC)Your experience with Wikipedia so far
Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.
To learn more about the study, visit this link: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op
To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85
Thanks!
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Arfæst! 19:25, 2 January 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Deleting userpage content / drafts / sandboxes / etc.
Hey Ambrosia10. You were asking about how to get pages within your userspace removed, like sandboxes and drafts once their contents are moved to the article space. The way this works is basically by requesting a speedy deletion of that page by adding the following bit of text top:
{{Template:Db-u1}}
This produces a tag that looks like this at the top of the page, and is posted to a list of articles nominated speedy deletion, where any administrator can review it delete it. These are usually uncontroversial, so you would never be asked to explain yourself for the kinds of cases I described. Within a day or two, the page should be deleted. If you put it on a page by accident, you can simply undo it or remove it; if the page does get deleted accidentally, you can request it back here should you need it for any reason. Let me know if you have any questions. Thanks, I, JethroBT drop me a line 00:28, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Māori Resources?
By the way, one thing I wanted to ask you about was whether you might be aware of good sources by or about the Māori. Last year, I worked on a biography for Tuterei Karewa, a subject of numerous kinds of artwork, but found very little about him or his life. Any chance you know of sources (digitized or otherwise) that might be a good place to start looking for more information? I, JethroBT drop me a line 00:33, 23 January 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 7
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Margaret Mary Butler, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Thomas O'Shea and Peter Fraser (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:18, 7 March 2015 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by David Biddulph (talk) 17:48, 7 March 2015 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a search with the contents of Ella Orr Campbell, and it appears to be very similar to another Wikipedia page: Template:Biography. It is possible that you have accidentally duplicated contents, or made an error while creating the page— you might want to look at the pages and see if that is the case. If you are intentionally trying to rename an article, please see Help:Moving a page for instructions on how to do this without copying and pasting. If you are trying to move or copy content from one article to a different one, please see Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia and be sure you have acknowledged the duplication of material in an edit summary to preserve attribution history.
It is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article. CorenSearchBot (talk) 03:31, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi-I moved the article into the Draft namespace while you work on it. I don't think that only the substed template should be in the main namespace. Origamiteⓣⓒ 03:33, 14 March 2015 (UTC)
About Ella Orr Campbell - a possible "WP:DYK"?
Kia ora, Ambrosia10,
I'm Peter in Australia aka "Shirt58". I can see you have had a somewhat unpleasant introduction to the Wikipedia project.
One of the articles you have created - Ella Orr Campbell - could appear on the English language Wikipedia's main page as a "Wikipedia:Did you know". The "DYK" process is somewhat convoluted - as are many things on this sometimes giant bureaucracy that is supposed to be WP:NOTBUREAUCRACY.
What do you think about this?
Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 10:51, 15 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hello again, Ambrosia10.
- Yeah, the bureaucratic mindset around here is rather toxic to new contributors. And I say this as someone who wields the very tools of the 1984 "Inner Party".
- "However I am very happy to raise the profile of women scientists and particular Dr Campbell. Would I have to do anything to assist the process?"
- If I say "I'll look into it, and help you out where I can", I might fall into the same condescending/helpful things that blokes who try out and help out at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Women scientists.
- Executive summary: just keep writing articles about women scientists, respond to constructive criticism, and don't give an airborne intercourse about anything else.
- Pete AU aka --Shirt58 (talk) 12:02, 17 March 2015 (UTC)
Hello Ambosio10, As a person interested in botany and horticulture (and biographies), I enjoyed reading your new article about Ella Orr Campbell. I added a couple of images of two of the key species and also made an inbound link to her article from the Equisetum arvense article. The images and link should support a nomination for DYK. Looking forward to more articles from you on botany and interesting women! Whiteghost.ink (talk) 00:13, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 16
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that you've added some links pointing to disambiguation pages. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
- Lucy Beatrice Moore (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver)
- added links pointing to Lincoln, Marlborough, Warkworth and Dactylanthus
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:25, 16 March 2015 (UTC) Done
Nice work in expanding this from a one line stub to an informative article. I've removed a parameter from one refernece as it dind't make sense. Was The Two Lucies the title of the lecture she gave and/or the chapter title in the book? If so that should use the parameter |chapter=
not |author-link=
, author-link is used when you want to link the refernece to the Wikipedia article on the author. Nthep (talk) 09:47, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- Thanks for your recent help on this article. As regards your query concerning the citation, I was attempting to include the title of the chapter in the book. The chapter is called "The Two Lucies." I'm unsure of whether this was also the title of Moore's lecture. As I was using the cite book template I'm now unsure how to add in this piece of information back into the citation appropriately. Sorry! I'm still very much a beginner when it comes to Wikipedia markup. Anyway, thanks again for your assistance. It was much appreciated. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Ambrosia10 (talk • contribs) 10:00, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
- No problem, I've added The Two Lucies as a chapter title. Don't apologise for being a beginner - we all were once :-) And wiki markup isn't necessarily the easiest at times. I still have to check a lot of syntax etc out when I'm editing and I've been around quite a long time. Nthep (talk) 11:08, 16 March 2015 (UTC)
Copyright problem: Ella Orr Campbell
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! We welcome and appreciate your contributions, such as Ella Orr Campbell, but we regretfully cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from either web sites or printed material. This article appears to contain material copied from http://plants.jstor.org/stable/history/10.5555/al.ap.person.bm000365733, and therefore to constitute a violation of Wikipedia's copyright policies. The copyrighted text has been or will soon be deleted. While we appreciate contributions, we must require all contributors to understand and comply with our copyright policy. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators are liable to be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under license allowed by Wikipedia, then you should do one of the following:
- If you have permission from the author to release the text under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), leave a message explaining the details at Talk:Ella Orr Campbell and send an email with confirmation of permission to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". Make sure you quote the exact page name, Ella Orr Campbell, in your email. See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
- If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License and GNU Free Documentation License, and note that you have done so on Talk:Ella Orr Campbell. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials for instructions.
- If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted "under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike License (CC-BY-SA), version 3.0", or that the material is released into the public domain, or if you have strong reason to believe it is, leave a note at Talk:Ella Orr Campbell with a link to where we can find that note or your explanation of why you believe the content is free for reuse.
It may also be necessary for the text be modified to have an encyclopedic tone and to follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.
If you would like to begin working on a new version of the article you may do so at this temporary page. Leave a note at Talk:Ella Orr Campbell saying you have done so and an administrator will move the new article into place once the issue is resolved.
Thank you, and please feel welcome to continue contributing to Wikipedia. Happy editing! Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 11:35, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Have written to the Teahouse asking what I should do to solve this issue. My message "Ella_Orr_Campbell is a recent article that I've done the majority of work. It's has been flagged for copyright infringement. I don't think I have infringed copyright. There is little published works about this renowned New Zealand botanist and I created the article from the same sources used by JSTOR global plants. I have cited those sources as well as used my own words etc. I've created the article as a whole with a new structure gathering information from as wide a variety of sources as possible, citing appropriately as I go. Given JSTOR global plants, like I did, used the used the same references it is not surprising the article is similar although it is NOT a copy nor the same. I spent hours on it. How do I argue or address this issue? Ambrosia10 (talk) 17:16, 23 March 2015 (UTC)" Ambrosia10 (talk) 17:19, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Ambrosia10! Posting at the Teahouse is a good move, I hope you get some useful advice there. I've posted there and at Talk:Ella Orr Campbell to explain what the nature of the problem is. I'm afraid that, despite what you say, you have in fact infringed copyright. Four things:
- Please make sure it doesn't happen again; everything you write in Wikipedia must (with a very few specific exceptions) be entirely in your own words
- If you want to start on a rewrite of Ella Orr Campbell please feel free to do so – click the third of the three "Show" tags at middle right on the copyvio template covering the page to be taken to a new temporary page; please do not copy over any text to the new page unless you are 100% certain that you wrote it entirely yourself (copying the problem to the new page does not help to fix the problem!)
- If you think there might be other articles where the same has happened (i.e., you have incorporated text from other places on the internet believing that to be acceptable), please identify them here; I am happy to help with cleaning those up too
- Please don't be discouraged from editing. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 18:20, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
- Hi, Ambrosia10! Posting at the Teahouse is a good move, I hope you get some useful advice there. I've posted there and at Talk:Ella Orr Campbell to explain what the nature of the problem is. I'm afraid that, despite what you say, you have in fact infringed copyright. Four things:
Hard not to be discouraged. However have recently read this "Looking at the copyvio detector report it's clear that prior to the WP article being blanked there was close paraphrasing/copying in the "career" and "retirement" sections of the article from this Global Plants article. However, it is also clear that the article as a whole is not a mere copy-paste but includes well formatted references from half a dozen reliable source. I'm going to re-write the two offending paragraphs now, and then return the rest of the article content as it was before. OK? Wittylama 18:24, 23 March 2015 (UTC)" and am feeling slightly better about the situation.Ambrosia10 (talk) 18:32, 23 March 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for March 27
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Rose E. Collom, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Royal Botanical Gardens (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed this. Ambrosia10 (talk) 15:50, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
Some stroopwafels for you!
nice article Mary Isabel McCracken,
added an image and if you get tired of sitranscribe, come on over to https://en.wikisource.org/wiki/Main_Page Duckduckstop (talk) 17:06, 27 March 2015 (UTC) |
- hi did an essay here: Wikipedia & copyright. — Preceding unsigned comment added by 38.127.143.193 (talk) 17:14, 27 March 2015 (UTC)
The Purple Barnstar | ||
for equanimity during copyright questioning Duckduckstop (talk) 17:24, 27 March 2015 (UTC) |
Thank you
Smithsonian Institution Archives Women in Science Edit-a-thon Barnstar | ||
Thanks and appreciation for your efforts to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Women in science at the 2015 Smithsonian Institution Archives Women in Science Edit-a-thon. It was a success and you were a great part of it! --Digitaleffie (talk) 17:22, 30 March 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 4
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Berwick-upon-Tweed, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page George Johnston (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:53, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed issue - doneAmbrosia10 (talk) 08:57, 4 April 2015 (UTC)
A barnstar for you
The Original Barnstar | ||
For perseverance and keeping going despite being hit by a few issues early on; and creating a number of new articles in a vastly under-represented area. Nthep (talk) 10:06, 8 April 2015 (UTC) |
Disambiguation link notification for April 11
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Elsie Wilkins Sexton, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:58, 11 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 18
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Emily Collins (botanist), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Chon Buri (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:22, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed error Ambrosia10 (talk) 09:25, 18 April 2015 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for April 25
Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited List of citizen science projects, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Taxonomy (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:15, 25 April 2015 (UTC)
- Fixed Ambrosia10 (talk) 06:39, 2 May 2015 (UTC)
Ella Orr Campbell has been nominated for Did You Know
Hello, Ambrosia10. Ella Orr Campbell, an article you either created or significantly contributed to, has been nominated to appear on Wikipedia's Main Page as part of Did you know . You can see the hook and the discussion here. You are welcome to participate! Thank you. APersonBot (talk!) 02:18, 10 May 2015 (UTC) |
Amos Arthur Heller
It was Edward Strieby Steele who moved to Los Angeles in 1932, not Amos Arthur Heller (who lived in Chico during that period.) Steele's niece was Helen Steele Pratt (1883-1965.) Helen, who was known as 'the bird lady of Eagle Rock', was the daughter of Steele's sister Frances Cochran (Steele) Pratt. Nomen ambiguum (talk) 07:21, 18 May 2015 (UTC)
- Whoops! Thanks for the correction! Will go back and ensure I've corrected anything I've edited. Sorry about the mistake. Should have ensured my notes were in two separate files rather than researching both women at once. Thanks again for correcting me, much appreciated.--Ambrosia10 (talk) 21:11, 18 May 2015 (UTC)