This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography, a collaborative effort to create, develop and organize Wikipedia's articles about people. All interested editors are invited to join the project and contribute to the discussion. For instructions on how to use this banner, please refer to the documentation.BiographyWikipedia:WikiProject BiographyTemplate:WikiProject Biographybiography articles
An editor has requested that an image or photograph be added to this article.
This article was reviewed by member(s) of WikiProject Articles for creation. The project works to allow users to contribute quality articles and media files to the encyclopedia and track their progress as they are developed. To participate, please visit the project page for more information.Articles for creationWikipedia:WikiProject Articles for creationTemplate:WikiProject Articles for creationAfC articles
This article has been given a rating which conflicts with the project-independent quality rating in the banner shell. Please resolve this conflict if possible.
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Plants, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of plants and botany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the discussion and see a list of open tasks.PlantsWikipedia:WikiProject PlantsTemplate:WikiProject Plantsplant articles
Latest comment: 9 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
A useful resource that can probably be used to improve the scope of this biography is "Charlotte Ellis of the Sandia Mountains" by Eugene Jercinovic ([1] and [2]). There are also photos of Ellis, although I don't know if they are in the public domain. The author's contact information is at the end of the second document.
Citation:
Jercinovic, Eugene. "Charlotte Ellis of the Sandia Mountains." The New Mexico Botanist 42 (21 Feb. 2008): 1-38. Print.
Latest comment: 3 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
In what way is this person a scientist? She never studied, taught or wrote anything scientific. She was a frontier woman with a hard life but an interest in plants who collected some 500 voucher specimens, most now lost. I don't think that makes her a scientist. I don't consider explorers with much more extensive collections botanists, unless they actually studied or published about botany. Perhaps others believe that woman should be held to lower standards? Leo Breman (talk) 12:04, 23 August 2020 (UTC)Reply
