Archive 1Archive 2Archive 3Archive 4Archive 5Archive 6Archive 10

15:19, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

19:30, 16 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Policy

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Policy. Legobot (talk) 04:31, 18 May 2017 (UTC)

New Page Review - Newsletter No.4

Hello Alsee,
 

Since rolling out the right in November, just 6 months ago, we now have 816 reviewers, but the backlog is still mysteriously growing fast. If every reviewer did just 55 reviews, the 22,000 backlog would be gone, in a flash, schwoop, just like that!

But do remember: Rather than speed, quality and depth of patrolling and the use of correct CSD criteria are essential to good reviewing. Do not over-tag. Make use of the message feature to let the creator know about your maintenance tags. See the tutorial again HERE. Get help HERE.

Stay up to date with recent new page developments and have your say, read THIS PAGE.


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 15:42, 21 May 2017 (UTC)

22:04, 22 May 2017 (UTC)

3RR noticeboard

Notification of users on their talk page that they are being discussed at WP:ANEW is mandatory. I just filed a duplicate request because there was no such notification on the user's talk page. VQuakr (talk) 18:42, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

I misread the timestamps; I see we posted within a few minutes of each other an you probably were in the process of notifying. Before I thought your post was ~1 hour old. Thanks! VQuakr (talk) 19:18, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
VQuakr, yep, chuckle. I was thrown for a loop for a few minutes when your post popped up while I was making clean-up edits to my report. You and I were interweaving edits, trying to sort out what was going on. I think I've only done zero or one Editwar-noticeboard reports before. To be honest, I'm not 100% certain whether I would have remembered to post the notification on their talk page. I got absorbed in your report at the exact moment I would have (or should have) considered making that notification. So thanks for ensuring the notification was made.
I have Twinkle, but I was thrown off that Twinkle didn't show any report-options while I was looking at the noticeboard. I filed everything manually. I now realize I should have gone to their user_talk, and activated Twinkle from there. Alsee (talk) 19:37, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
The Twinkle dashboard for AN3 is not perfect (I usually have to clean something up), but it does at least assemble most of the diffs. VQuakr (talk) 19:45, 23 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Money.Net

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Money.Net. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 24 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Medical resources

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Medical resources. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 27 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Electromagnetic Aircraft Launch System. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

12:18, 30 May 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White Helmets (Syrian Civil War). Legobot (talk) 04:30, 3 June 2017 (UTC)

19:04, 5 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Wikipedia policies and guidelines

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Wikipedia policies and guidelines. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 8 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Bahá'í Faith

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Bahá'í Faith. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 11 June 2017 (UTC)

15:29, 12 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Voting method

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Voting method. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 15 June 2017 (UTC)

15:44, 19 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Xbox One

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Xbox One. Legobot (talk) 04:30, 21 June 2017 (UTC)

08:41, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

Invitation for interview regarding your work with RfCs

Hi Alsee,

I’m Chris Schilling, a Wikimedia Foundation staff member and editor. I’m seeking your help to understand how you review and close RfCs, due to your experience with this task on English Wikipedia. I am working with two researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology (MIT), Amy Zhang and David Karger, and they would be interested in interviewing you about your current or past work behind participating in and closing RfCs. This interview would last for about 1 to 1-½ hours, and you would be compensated $15.00 USD for your time.

Amy and David will be conducting the interviews, and then sharing the results of their research with the Wikimedia Foundation and on Meta. For information about how the collected information will be handled, see the MIT privacy information on the consent form.

We need your expertise, so if you are interested in participating in an interview, please contact both Amy Zhang (axz mit.edu) and myself (cschilling wikimedia.org), or you can reply back here on your talk page.

Thanks for your consideration, I JethroBT (WMF) (talk) 21:43, 23 June 2017 (UTC)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Isaac Newton in popular culture. Legobot (talk) 04:24, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

15:38, 26 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Template talk:Infobox

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Template talk:Infobox. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 29 June 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Legitimacy (criminal law)

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Legitimacy (criminal law). Legobot (talk) 04:26, 2 July 2017 (UTC)

15:31, 3 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Audio converter

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Audio converter. Legobot (talk) 04:27, 8 July 2017 (UTC)

15:07, 10 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:2017 Qatar diplomatic crisis

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:2017 Qatar diplomatic crisis. Legobot (talk) 04:28, 11 July 2017 (UTC)

New Page Reviewer Newsletter

Hello Alsee, thank you for your efforts reviewing new pages!
 

Backlog update:

  • The new page backlog is currently at 18,511 pages. We have worked hard to decrease from over 22,000, but more hard work is needed! Please consider reviewing even just a few pages a a day.
  • Some editors are committing to work specifically on patrolling new pages on 15 July. If you have not reviewed new pages in a while, this might be a good time to be involved. Please remember that quality of patrolling is more important than quantity, that the speedy deletion criteria should be followed strictly, and that ovetagging for minor issues should be avoided.

Technology update:

  • Several requests have been put into Phabractor to increase usability of the New Pages Feed and the Page Curation toolbar. For more details or to suggest improvements go to Wikipedia:Page Curation/Suggested improvements
  • The tutorial has been updated to include links to the following useful userscripts. If you were not aware of them, they could be useful in your efforts reviewing new pages:

General project update:


If you wish to opt-out of future mailings, go here. TonyBallioni (talk) 03:48, 14 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Kombucha

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Kombucha. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

22:59, 17 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Presidential Advisory Commission on Election Integrity. Legobot (talk) 04:29, 23 July 2017 (UTC)

15:57, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

16:43, 24 July 2017 (UTC)

Hopefully my read was accurate

Hi Alsee; I made a small correction to a comment of yours on Talk:Kim Jong-un, thinking it a typo, but I wanted to double-check with you, so as not to potentially change your intended commentary. Snow let's rap 08:26, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Yep, thanx. Alsee (talk) 08:46, 26 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:Islamic calendar

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:Islamic calendar. Legobot (talk) 04:25, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

111

--223.104.17.214 (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)--223.104.17.214 (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)--223.104.17.214 (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)--223.104.17.214 (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)--223.104.17.214 (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)--223.104.17.214 (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)--223.104.17.214 (talk) 07:57, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Hello? Did you have a comment or question for me? Alsee (talk) 13:48, 27 July 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:0.999...

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:0.999.... Legobot (talk) 04:26, 30 July 2017 (UTC)

21:45, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

About RfC on the draftspace

What is the problem of having a discussion on the purpose of the draftspace? There does exist a clear disagreement and we really need to have a proper place to document the community's view. That's what the RfC is for. I'm not asking you to agree with me; I'm asking to assess the community'a view. I don't know how you can oppose to that. -- Taku (talk) 08:14, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

@Alsee: About the challenge to the closure: no I did not know the protocol. But the closure was unnecessary and reverting was a normal thing to do that instance. -- Taku (talk) 09:25, 31 July 2017 (UTC)

Taku, Ok. You were unaware that you shouldn't just hit the REVERT button on a close you dislike. The proper thing to do is talk to the closer first. If I don't adequately address your concerns then you can challenge the close and ask administrators to revert it.
You already have multiple Administrators threatening you with a topic ban. Edit warring against a closure may be viewed as combative. It will only dig you in a deeper hole.
I suggest you restore my close before someone else does. (Or invite me to do so, if you're unsure how to do so cleanly.) Then we can continue the discussion on WT:Drafts. We don't need an RFC to answer your questions. Is this acceptable? Alsee (talk) 09:42, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Taku. Someone already restored the close. Are you willing to accept the close, and non-combatively ask any questions you have at WT:Drafts? Alsee (talk) 09:59, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
For the record, as I wrote there, I'm not proposing anything concretely but would like to collect the community's opinion on the proper use of the draftspace. I didn't think the format of the RfC was problematic but if that was a problem, I'm willing to address that. I get you didn't think it need not be a RfC. I think it should be. So if I may, I would like to ask for the RfC to be reopened. -- Taku (talk) 23:06, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
You wrote "the general community consensus appears to be that draft space is a useful place for productive drafts". I'm not challenging that but there is a clear disagreement on whether there should be some firm deadlines on the draft pages. Some subscribe to this view while the other don't (this disagreement is the source of recent disputes on my draft pages). It's more productive to have some centralized discussion and record the results so they can be cited in the deletion discussion, etc. An RfC is the best format for that. (That is, this is not my personal question.) -- Taku (talk) 23:20, 31 July 2017 (UTC)
Taku, I have opened a section at Drafts#proper use of draft space and labor. The topic can be discussed there. If the discussion develops a clear and viable RFC question, with some support for it, then we can run a much better RFC. Alsee (talk) 11:48, 1 August 2017 (UTC)
Yes, I noticed and thank you for taking time. I think we are going in the right direction (finally). -- Taku (talk) 12:16, 1 August 2017 (UTC)

Please comment on Talk:White privilege

The feedback request service is asking for participation in this request for comment on Talk:White privilege. Legobot (talk) 04:26, 5 August 2017 (UTC)