Welcome! edit

  Hi! Welcome to the English Wikipedia!

Hello, Akirwan, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for registering an account. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

    Introduction
 5    The five pillars of Wikipedia
    How to edit a page
    Help
    Tips
    How to write a great article
    Manual of Style
    Be Bold
    Assume Good faith
    Keep cool
   Share your knowledge
    Get adopted
    Neutral point of view

And here are several pages on what to avoid:

  How to avoid Copyright infringement
  How not to spam
  Make sure not to get blocked, which should be no problem after reading this
  The Three-Revert-Rule and how to avoid breaking it

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Also, I think that you might be interested in the adopt-a-user project, where advanced editors can guide you in your editing; so check it out if you want. Again, welcome!  Gman124 talk 23:48, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Law of Attraction edit

I have removed a section that you wrote on the Law of Attraction article as it was written in non-standard encyclopedic language. I have saved a copy of the section at User:GofG/loa. I would advise that you rewrite it and reinclude it, while discussing on the LoA talk page, or it will remain gone. GofG ||| Talk 19:59, 8 July 2008 (UTC)Reply


I respectfully disagree. If style is the issue, there is no reason to remove it. If you want to recommend stylistic changes that is one thing, but do not just delete the entire thing!

Please sign your comments. Style is a part of the issue, the main issue that I have with it is that it would seem that its only purpose is to provide instructions on how to get the Law of Attraction to work for a user; this is not information that should be included in an encyclopedia, especially when the existence of the Law of Attraction is still in question. I suppose the problem is that, a: it has no references and makes claims that require references, b: it is written as though at least some aspects of the Law of Attraction are certainly true, and c: it is written like a cross between an article and an instruction manual. JW ||| Talk 00:59, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

AfD nomination of The Science of Getting Rich Revisited edit

 

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Science of Getting Rich Revisited, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Science of Getting Rich Revisited. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? OhNoitsJamie Talk 00:04, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Original research edit

Wikipedia does not publish original research. If you continue to post original research, you may be blocked from editing. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:24, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Law of Attraction edit

  Please stop. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did to Law of Attraction, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dppowell (talk) 02:48, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Last warning edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like to remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. OhNoitsJamie Talk 02:49, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

Blocked for disruption edit

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

Dppowell (talk) 04:29, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply

COI notification edit

Your situation is being discussed on the conflict of interest noticeboard. You should have been notified when your case there was opened. I apologize for the oversight. Dppowell (talk) 13:56, 9 July 2008 (UTC)Reply