Your submission at Articles for creation: Musfiq R Farhan (February 4)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vinegarymass911 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, Ahhabib24! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Vinegarymass911 (talk) 20:06, 4 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

Reverting an admin is not a good idea

edit

Hi. It is never a good idea to revert an administrator. It is a far better process to follow the instruction. Your actions across the wikis smell highly of conflict of interest and possibly paid editing. I also doubt that there is clear case of reliable sources in use here. — billinghurst sDrewth 21:58, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

You did it again and then have the lack of wisdom to drop that warning on my user talk page. Stop, listen and think. Your combative nature and approach is quite wrong. I have moved the page to draft namespace. Please use the draft talk page for your continued conversation. No more edit wars or you will find yourself in deep trouble. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:06, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
It's not Paid editing, don't delete this page again, thanks. User:Pigsonthewing , User:A. B. Ahhabib24 (talk) 22:08, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
I moved this article to the draft namespace purposefully, and you moved it back. You have been warned by me and by others about edit warring, and your approach, yet you do not seem to heed the guidance provided to you. The article is now firmly in draft: namespace, and you must not move it back to main namespace, as that task will be undertaken by an article reviewer when they are comfortable that it meets our standards. Feel free to edit that draft article, and use its talk page to discuss the article once your three hour block has completed. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:18, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Note to fellow admins, please check the user talk page history for removed components — billinghurst sDrewth 22:22, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

February 2024

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, discussion pages are meant to be a record of a discussion; deleting or editing legitimate comments, as you did at Wikipedia:Teahouse, is considered bad practice, even if you meant well. Even making spelling and grammatical corrections in others' comments is generally frowned upon, as it tends to irritate the users whose comments you are correcting. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Cordless Larry (talk) 22:12, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply

This guy Billinghurst delete an established page Ariyan Mehedi and blocked me....... please help me Ahhabib24 (talk) 22:17, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
This guy Billinghurst delete an established page Ariyan Mehedi and blocked me....... please help me Ahhabib24 (talk) 22:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
When your three hour block expires, please use the teahouse. — billinghurst sDrewth 22:20, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
Indef blocked. Qcne (talk) 22:24, 26 February 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello! Ahhabib24, you are invited to join other new editors and friendly hosts in the Teahouse. The Teahouse is an awesome place to meet people, ask questions and learn more about Wikipedia. Please join us!