Welcome to my talk page. Please leave your message below. I will respond on this page unless otherwise requested. Remember to sign your posts using four tildes (~~~~).

Communication Guidelines

edit
  • Please be civil and assume good faith in all interactions.
  • For article-specific discussions, please use the relevant article's talk page.
  • If you're reporting a problem, please provide specific details and links.
  • For urgent matters, you may also contact me via email if I have enabled it in my preferences.

Ongoing Discussions

edit

There are currently no ongoing discussions. New topics will be listed here.

Archive

edit

Old discussions are periodically archived to keep this page manageable. You can find past discussions here:

Last updated: 15 July 2024 | View page history

July 2024

edit

Information icon Welcome to Wikipedia. Unfortunately, content you added to Paracas Candelabra appears to be a minority or fringe viewpoint, and appears to have given undue weight to this minority viewpoint, and has been reverted. To maintain a neutral point of view, an idea that is not broadly supported by scholarship in its field must not be given undue weight in an article about a mainstream idea. Feel free to use the article's talk page to discuss this, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Your sources also failed to meet our criteria at WP:RS and WP:VERIFY. And WP:NOR. Doug Weller talk 18:42, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shringinari (July 4)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Qcne was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Qcne (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply
Teahouse logo
Hello, AdarshVerma0! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Qcne (talk) 18:47, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:Shringinari has a new comment

edit
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Shringinari. Thanks! Graeme Bartlett (talk) 22:57, 4 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Shringinari (July 10)

edit
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 10:10, 10 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

Page block

edit

Hi, AdarshVerma0. I notice you have ignored Doug Weller's warning about Paracas Candelabra above — no reply, and no change in your use of unreliable sources. That's not good enough. You have been indefinitely page-blocked from Paracas Candelabra. Note that you can still edit the talkpage, as well as the rest of Wikipedia. You can request unblock from an uninvolved administrator by placing {{unblock|your reason here}} on this page. Bishonen | tålk 12:28, 12 July 2024 (UTC).Reply