User talk:Acer/Archive 2
Havelock the Dane's block edit
Thanks for bringing that to my attention. I am going to try to get a hold of the person who did that checkuser, but they live in a time zone that's fast asleep now and it might be a while. east.718 at 13:26, January 6, 2008
Signpost updated for January 14th, 2008. edit
 |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 3 | 14 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:51, 18 January 2008 (UTC)
The article you created does not explain who he was, from the text he seems like a sportsman, but do you think you could add which sport? RT | Talk 13:58, 20 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 21st, 2008. edit
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 4 | 21 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 00:23, 24 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for January 28th, 2008. edit
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 5 | 28 January 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 04:09, 31 January 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 4th, 2008. edit
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 6 | 4 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:31, 6 February 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for February 11th, 2008. edit
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 7 | 11 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 09:11, 14 February 2008 (UTC)
An Invite to join Saskatchewan WikiProject edit
 Hi, you are graciously extended an invitation to join the Saskatchewan WikiProject! The Saskatchewan WikiProject is a fairly new WikiProject. We are a group of editors who are dedicated to creating, revising, and expanding articles, lists, categories, and Wikiprojects, to do with anything Saskatchewan. |
| As you have shown an interest in White Bear, Saskatchewan we thought you might like to take an interest in this growing WikiProject. |
| Please assist with any ongoing requests |
| You might like to take an extra interest in our To Do list |
| Another project dedicated to Saskatchewan is the Saskatchewan Roads and Highways Wikiproject |
| Also, a descendant project for Saskatchewan is the WikiProject Saskatchewan Communities & Neighbourhoods |
| We look forward to welcoming you to the project! SriMesh | talk 02:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC) |
Signpost updated for February 18th and 25th, 2008. edit
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 8 | 18 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 9 | 25 February 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:04, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
double check edit
Hi RIP,
I have noticed you double checking the AFC archives. What are you doing? And do you need any help? Graeme Bartlett (talk) 11:48, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
- In the very early days there were no standard templates, so there are some declined or accepted by comment only, without a ribbon, so you have to read the comment to see what it was. I suppose this could be edited to todays standard, but no need to, in my opinion. The worst ones are where the box includes the heading, then the macro's dont work on the preceeding article! I may have a look tomorrow at some old ones. Graeme Bartlett (talk) 12:36, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
Spam in Cayman Islands Investment Bureau edit
Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Cayman Islands Investment Bureau, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Cayman Islands Investment Bureau is blatant advertising for a company, product, group, service or person that would require a substantial rewrite in order to become an encyclopedia article.
To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Cayman Islands Investment Bureau, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. To see the user who deleted the page, click here CSDWarnBot (talk) 18:00, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Well, I have removed the speedy tag. Otolemur crassicaudatus (talk) 18:20, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Hey, thanks for the comments, and the offer of help. By my count, there are 8 red links remaining, which shouldn't take that long to stubify. Nice work with Granat, BTW: it looks much better than most of the other space telescope articles... Mike Peel (talk) 21:08, 3 March 2008 (UTC)
Signpost updated for March 3rd, 2008. edit
| |
|---|
|
| ||
| Volume 4, Issue 10 | 3 March 2008 | About the Signpost |
|
| ||
|
| |
| Home | Archives | Newsroom | Tip Line | Single-Page View | Shortcut : WP:POST |
|
| |
You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot (talk) 08:21, 5 March 2008 (UTC)
Speedy deletion of Neomis Animation edit
A tag has been placed on Neomis Animation requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mhsb (talk) 13:20, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
E. R.G. Eckert edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article E. R.G. Eckert, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of E. R.G. Eckert. Fléêťflämẽ U-T-C 19:01, 14 March 2008 (UTC)
Re: A little motivational tool for your students edit
Many thanks for that link. It's fascinating! I'll pass on the info. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 09:08, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Many thanks for going through all the WP:MMM start-class articles and giving them a review. This will be very encouraging for those whose articles were upgraded, and your comments are very helpful for those that are still at start-class. Thanks again! --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 11:35, 16 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for help on The President (novel)!! edit
I just wanted to say thanks for chipping in and looking over our spelling, mine tends to be awful! Also, if you know what to look for in an MoS sweep and have the time to give the article a look over, we would really appreciate it. We are gunning for a GA article soon and then hopefully an FA! Thanks again, --Mfreud (talk) 06:13, 17 March 2008 (UTC)
Articles for creation edit
I noticed that you rejected somebody's proposed article on Smith v. Kansas city Title & Trust Co., 255 U.S. 180 (1921) because "The proposed article is not suitable for Wikipedia." I suggest replacing this with something more specific, such as "The proposed article appears to be copied and pasted from another source. Please rewrite the article in your own words, citing the original source as necessary." (As an aside, I am not absolutely certain whether the source is copyrighted or not: U.S. government works generally are not copyrighted, but it is possible that the submitter obtained the text from a non-U.S. government source, or that it may contain embedded copyrighted content.) 69.140.152.55 (talk) 04:23, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for help on Mario Vargas Llosa! edit
Ya I noticed a couple of wikilinks that seemed like overkill, so I started removing them and I guess I got carried away... I'm getting my group to have a look at that paragraph and we'll see what we can do. Thanks again for all your help! Lincolnchan98 (talk) 02:18, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Mario Vargas Llosa passed GA review! Thanks so much for all your help! :) Lincolnchan98 (talk) 00:50, 27 March 2008 (UTC)
Weasel words? edit
You removed the words "much larger" from the reference to the Citizendium article on Onslow Beach, calling them weasel words. They don't seem to fit the definition of weasel words at all -- "implying something which is difficult to substantiate." The WP article is a 50-word stub. The Citizendium article is 600+ words, with photos, a gallery, and eight references. What's wrong with calling it "much larger?" Lou Sander (talk) 14:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
- Oops! Forgot to sign it. Thanks for the fast reply. Do you have a reference to the standard practice? Lou Sander (talk) 14:07, 23 March 2008 (UTC)
re: I, the Supreme edit
No harm done! I hadn't started the review, so I'm more than happy to let you continue your good work. Please feel free to replace my name on the template at GAN with your own. Happy reviewing. :) María (habla conmigo) 14:38, 28 March 2008 (UTC)
Would it be all right if a bot substituted those templates? Singularity 18:22, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
This seems to be close to B-Class now. What do you think? The editors would probably appreciate a boost. Geometry guy 20:14, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
- Nicely done! Geometry guy 21:37, 30 March 2008 (UTC)
ASR edit
<smooch!> Thanks, and I agree. :) --Elonka 10:52, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Manuel Octavio Gómez, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.imdb.com/name/nm0351182. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 02:58, 5 April 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar of Awesomeness edit
Acer, thanks for all the help on MVLL. I don't know how close we are to FAC, but all your work has very much been appreciated. For that, I award you with this barnstar:
Enjoy! Lincolnchan98 (talk) 17:37, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: Angel Asturias edit
(Copied over from my talk page:) Acer, thanks for this. Magnificent stuff! You know, I wouldn't add anything else for the moment. It'll be a while before anyone really fills in much on the other novels (though I hope Men of Maize gets a decent article one of these days). They're not much read. So no need to multiply the redlinks too much. --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 07:56, 8 April 2008 (UTC)
Even if it were edit
Even if it were an invitation only group (which just seems a non-Wiki way to do things) you would have more than earned an invitation. As far as I'm concerned the only prerequisite is support for the goals of the FA team. Glad you're going to be joining us! And thanks for all the work you've done on the MMM articles; I hope you're enjoying it as much as I am. Mike Christie (talk) 02:19, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- A warm welcome to the FA-Team from me too! Your contribution has been fantastic! Geometry guy 10:44, 11 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'll add a welcome from me too! In some respects it's quite an intimidating line-up of editors there - when I signed up, I must confess to being a bit dubious about just how useful I'd be - but there's nowhere better to learn quality editing! Your work has been magnificent, and I'm looking forward to working with you ;) EyeSerenetalk 15:54, 12 April 2008 (UTC)
How awesome are you? edit
|
The Tireless Contributor Barnstar | |
| I know this isn't nearly as cool as the other barnstar I gave you, but it's still well-deserved for your work on Mario Vargas Llosa. Great job and thank you! Lincolnchan98 (talk) 00:10, 13 April 2008 (UTC) |
Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/P.wormer edit
Good detective work! Your detecting was correct: see Wikipedia:Requests for checkuser/Case/P.wormer. Cheers! Wassupwestcoast (talk) 01:56, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
My RfA... edit
EyeSerenetalk 16:23, 14 April 2008 (UTC)
GA passing edit
I just wonder why did you pass I, the Supreme seeing that there are, I think, four passages that needs citations. It fails Good article criteria #2. Thank you. --Efe (talk) 12:08, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Kohs quote edit
Re this edit I suggest you find better criticism than Gregory Kohs; if you are unaware, this guy has a serious vendetta against WP and pops up on any blog posting anywhere to slam the site. Including criticism is one thing; including the deluded rantings of an idiot is something else. For my part, I thought it was supposed to be a joke -- in an "anything that Kohs slams must be good!" kind of way. Regards, howcheng {chat} 20:59, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yup I know about Kohs and his habit of searching the net for any mention of the word Wikipedia so he can criticize it. But you see, he was the only one so far that came right out against the project (granted he probably couldn’t care less about it) and did so with a statement that any person with a minimum of common sense will find hilarious, and that makes it all the best to include at the top of the page. In a way we’re making fun of him, lightening up our readers and showing criticism, IMO it’s the perfect choice. PS: if you're worried that we're giving him a spotlight and feeding his obsession and don't think that’s the case since he'll continue to criticize regardless until his wikibizz is allowed again (which I hope doesn’t happen) Acer (talk) 21:10, 21 April 2008 (UTC)
Barnstar of Murder!! edit
|
Barnstar of Murder, Madness, and Mayhem | |
| On behalf of Murder, Madness, and Mayhem, this barnstar is to thank you for your hard work and patience in motivating, mentoring, and moulding the work of student editors, and helping them to achieve excellence in research and writing. For your enthusiasm and hard work, not least diving also into content issues and research, plus your technical help. Thank you so much! |
Thanks Jb, it was really my pleasure lending a hand to such a great project.. I really feel I've been part of something special and thats a great feeling. PS: this will be a nice companion to the that other awesome barnstar ;) Acer (talk) 00:57, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- Yeah, yeah, the other barnstar's better. What can ya do? Anyhow, really I've been most impressed. And we'll sort out I, the Supreme properly soon... Perhaps FA one of these days? --jbmurray (talk|contribs) 01:31, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
- I'm definetly up for it! And also getting Miguel Angel Asturias up to GA. Also count me in for next semester :) Acer (talk) 01:45, 23 April 2008 (UTC)
Thanks for the links edit
... will definitely pass them along to that course organizer, and also take a look myself. Cheers, AndrewGNF (talk) 00:41, 28 April 2008 (UTC)
Re: I, the Supreme edit
Acer, just a note to say that I haven't forgotten. We may both be in low edit mode for a while, though. I'll be back at the weekend. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 11:49, 30 April 2008 (UTC)
Cyg-x1 edit
Hi there, I've been following your work on Cygnus-x1 since I did the GA review and I'm most impressed. Anyway, I was going truh the article again today and I noticed that the costallation map was missing cyg-x1 itself, so I made a guesstimate version based on these two images: [2] and [3], obviously its a crude estimate since I didn't take the scales into consideration, but it atleast gives a general idea. Anyhow I leave it up to you to use it or not. Its located here - Acer (talk) 22:29, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks. Eta and Cyg X-1 are separated by 26 arcminutes, so they're real close together on a map of that scale. As you can see by the image, Cyg X-1 is a little difficult to see when the map is scaled down.—RJH (talk) 22:38, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
- Yep, I figured I had spaced them more than they actually are but I decided to go with it anyway for clarity, as for the size, I was kind of hoping people would click on the image :P, are you suggesting I make the caption bigger or just scrap the idea alltoguether? I'm happy eitherway. Acer (talk) 22:45, 5 May 2008 (UTC)
WikiCookie edit
Hi. I think there's some sort of mistake - the title of the article and its subject are different. --brewcrewer (yada, yada) 22:13, 6 May 2008 (UTC)
DYK edit
|
On 7 May, 2008, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Isaac Bowman, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page. |
thanks edit
Thanks for approving my submission. Maybe one day I might register – but not today. 69.140.152.55 (talk) 01:10, 9 May 2008 (UTC)
Just to say hai edit
Tinucherian has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend or a possibly new friend. Cheers, and happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.
Have a great day ! -- TinuCherian (Wanna Talk?) - 09:51, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Rfb participation thanks edit
Hello, Acer.
I wanted to personally thank you for taking part in the project-wide discussions regarding my candidacy for bureaucratship. After bureaucratic discussion, the bureaucrats decided that there was sufficient significant and varied opposition to my candidacy, and thus no consensus to promote. Although personally disappointed, I both understand and respect their decision, especially in light of historical conservatism the project has had when selecting its bureaucrats. If you have any further suggestions or comments as to how you think I could help the project, please let me know. Once again, thank you for your support. -- Avi (talk) 18:58, 12 May 2008 (UTC)
Re:AfC edit
Thank you for those tips! I didn't realize that needed to be done, otherwise I would have started a long time ago. You're method of documenting in the summary sounds good, though. Thanks again!!! Winnifred-Ian-Leonard-Harry-Ellen-Lucy-Marilyn-Ingrid-Nora-Amanda Walter-Ira-Lauren-Lalla (talk) 21:57, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
- Replying to your recent message on my talk page: That's okay. It's easy to forget these sorts of things; I've had similar forgets when giving others instructions in the past. The important thing is, though, that you pointed it out to me, as I otherwise might not have known that it was a neccessary part of the job. In honour of that...
|
The Barnstar of Diligence | |
| For making sure a fellow AFC worker knew and understood the proper system for accepting potential articles, and giving credit to the IPs who submit them. Great work!!! The ''Gorgeous Girl''!!! (talk) 06:35, 17 May 2008 (UTC) |
RfA thanks! edit
|
RfA: Many thanks | |
| Many thanks for your participation in my recent request for adminship. I am impressed by the amount of thought that goes into people's contribution to the RfA process, and humbled that so many have chosen to trust me with this new responsibility. I step into this new role cautiously, but will do my very best to live up to your kind words and expectations, and to further the project of the encyclopedia. Again, thank you. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 16:02, 17 May 2008 (UTC) |
Gilberto Gil edit
I am withdrawing the FAC due to new opposes and the recommendation of Jbmurray, but that just allows us more flexible time to work! How are you doing on those book sources? --Kakofonous (talk) 11:34, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- Ok, I think that was the sensible thing to do. I have the books here but I havent managed to start reading them yet, still got some University stuff to take care of, that said I'm a pretty fast reader so once I start it wont take long to finish them. I'll try to do that by next week. Acer (talk) 18:51, 18 May 2008 (UTC)
- When you're able to, could you also translate the phrase "Aquele Abraço" into English? I haven't found the English equivalent in books or been able to translate it myself with my woefully abridged Portuguese dictionary. Babel Fish gives me "That One I Hug", but usually humans are better at this sort of thing. (: --Kakofonous (talk) 00:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
- Are you still around? You haven't edited it a while, so I thought I'd check. :) --Kakofonous (talk) 13:49, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
- When you're able to, could you also translate the phrase "Aquele Abraço" into English? I haven't found the English equivalent in books or been able to translate it myself with my woefully abridged Portuguese dictionary. Babel Fish gives me "That One I Hug", but usually humans are better at this sort of thing. (: --Kakofonous (talk) 00:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)
Granat edit
Hi, I changed "NaCl" to "NaI" for the Granat KONUS B detectors, as NaI(Tl) is the standard material (see gamma ray spectroscopy) and I am almost sure that must be what was intended. Since I do not know absolutely for certain, you might want to check your sources in case I am wrong. Cheers, Wwheaton (talk) 20:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- I just checked your source, and I see the error is in the GSFC web page as well. This sort of thing can happen when semi-technical staff people maintain web pages over a broad range of subject matter. I have worked in gamma-ray astronomical spectroscopy for many years, and I have never heard of NaCl being used as a scintillator. The high Z of the iodine is critical to stop gamma rays. I probably won't have time to track it further, but I am 99% certain it is incorrect. Neil Gehrels at GSFC might be able to get it verified and fixed, or you might be able to find out from the French. Phillipe Durouchoux at Saclay might be the one to ask. Wwheaton (talk) 20:59, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- I got an automated response from the guy at GSFC, he is on vacation. Presumably it will get fixed in due course. Really I think this is a great collaboration—I'm struggling to work and keep my job, don't really have time to put in the sort of effort you wonderful Wiki people do, but with a few minutes work I could fix up the problems I saw. I am thinking I will solicit some of my old friends and colleagues to keep watch too.
- Cheers, Bill Wwheaton (talk) 22:47, 23 May 2008 (UTC)
- Got an email from GSFC:
Dear Bill,
Thank you for pointing this out. This was probably a typo or transcription error as our other page on GRANAT mentions the NaI(Tl) crystal.
I've fixed the page, and if you have any information to add, we would be happy to incorporate that into the description.
Regards, Mike Arida for the HEASARC
and I also sent them a heads-up about the 5 billion ("billions and billions"...) problem. Wwheaton (talk) 03:52, 24 May 2008 (UTC)
Hi again, I got another e-mail from Mike Arida at GSFC, and learned that there are TWO sets of pages at GSFC, one for outreach (ie, to public) & one for scientists:
Hello Bill,
I never would have found that as it is on our outreach pages, and not on our main science pages. I've fixed it though it seems to be just a typo as the "official" page is at
http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/granat/granat.html
Thanks again for the help. Best regards, Mike
Anyhow, I thought you might like to be aware there are two for your future Wiki work:
http://imagine.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/sats_n_data/missions/granat.html
and
http://heasarc.gsfc.nasa.gov/docs/granat/granat.html
HEASARC is the official science archiving place for High Energy Astronomy missions, and they should have the most reliable information, I hope.
The FA-Team edit
Hi. There has been some discussion of how to improve the FA-Team's functioning. It's be grand if you could comment on the new suggested structure, and perhaps also look at our current proposals. Thanks. --jbmurray (talk • contribs) 18:34, 30 May 2008 (UTC)
FA-Team Mission 4 edit
Mission 4, a series of articles on the Everglades, could do with help from the FA-Team! Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 12:54, 16 June 2008 (UTC)
Proposed deletion of Harvey Kennedy edit
A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Harvey Kennedy, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Delicious carbuncle (talk) 02:31, 19 June 2008 (UTC)
FA-Team Proposals edit
Please comment on the current FA-Team proposals. Thanks! Awadewit (talk) 16:38, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
FA-Team successes! edit
Indigenous people of the Everglades region, Draining and development of the Everglades and Restoration of the Everglades have all recently become FAs! King Arthur is now at FAC! Thanks to our hard-working team members! Awadewit (talk) 18:10, 6 July 2008 (UTC)
New FA-Team mission needs your help! edit
Félix Houphouët-Boigny needs to be copyedited and peer reviewed. We would appreciate any and all help from the crack members of the FA-Team! Sign up here. Merci! Awadewit (talk) 12:04, 3 August 2008 (UTC)
Notice edit
 | Please accept this notice to join the Good Article Collaboration Center, a project aimed at improving five articles to GA status every month. We hope to see you there!--LAAFansign review 02:05, 6 October 2008 (UTC) {{{1}}} |
Henri Caesar edit
There appears to be no evidence that Henri Caesar actually existed (sadly enough; it's a great life story.) Unless you have access to RS saying otherwise, I suggest a major overhaul of the page. --Vincent pearse (talk) 16:48, 18 January 2009 (UTC)
A-class review request edit
Hey Acer, I was wondering if you could review the Spokane, Washington article in an ACR. After you read the article, I believe all you need to do is apply the A-Class criteria to the article and put whether you believe it is worthy of being A-class in the section dealing with the review in the articles Talk page. Also, in addition to doing the assessment, it would be helpful if you could include some points for improvement. If you are up to review it, notify me on my Talk. Thanks! Anon134 (talk) 21:52, 16 March 2009 (UTC)
FYI... edit
Created Song of Songs (2006 film) to replace Song of Songs (film) as there's another film with that name; see disambiguation page. Cheers! Shir-El too 12:29, 13 November 2009 (UTC)
Unreferenced BLPs edit
Hello Acer! Thank you for your contributions. I am a bot alerting you that 2 of the articles that you created are Unreferenced Biographies of Living Persons. Please note that all biographies of living persons must be sourced. If you were to add reliable, secondary sources to these articles, it would greatly help us with the current 940 article backlog. Once the articles are adequately referenced, please remove the {{unreferencedBLP}} tag. Here is the list:
- Oyeleye Oyediran - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
- Jim Paschke - Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL
Note edit
Just FYI, I referenced one of your comments here, hope you don't mind. rʨanaɢ talk/contribs 06:37, 5 February 2010 (UTC)
Nomination for deletion of Template:Domingo Faustino Sarmiento edit
Template:Domingo Faustino Sarmiento has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. MBelgrano (talk) 15:31, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
Template:Domingo Faustino Sarmiento edit
Regarding that template, you may want to read WP:NENAN. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 19:09, 16 March 2010 (UTC)
You are now a Reviewer edit
Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, will be commencing a a two-month trial at approximately 23:00, 2010 June 15 (UTC).
Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under flagged protection. Flagged protection is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial.
When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.
If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 18:06, 15 June 2010 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Pizza My Heart (restaurant) edit
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Pizza My Heart (restaurant) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about an organization or company, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion," which appears inside of the speedy deletion ({{db-...}}) tag (if no such tag exists, the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate). Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Noformation Talk 23:44, 29 May 2011 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article TRL Music is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/TRL Music until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Cirt (talk) 22:17, 22 October 2012 (UTC)
Nomination of Harpagofuator for deletion edit
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harpagofuator is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harpagofuator until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yzx (talk) 06:28, 23 May 2013 (UTC)