AbstractLakx, you are invited to the Teahouse! edit

 

Hi AbstractLakx! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like TheAafi (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

16:02, 5 May 2021 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Queen Mary School (May 5) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Robert McClenon was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.
Robert McClenon (talk) 21:11, 5 May 2021 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:King Edward VII School edit

  Hello, AbstractLakx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:King Edward VII School, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 7 October 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: King Edward VII School, Lytham has been accepted edit

 
King Edward VII School, Lytham, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

DGG ( talk ) 07:57, 6 November 2021 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Barnett (May 20) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Curb Safe Charmer was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Curb Safe Charmer (talk) 13:09, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

May 2022 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at Heartstopper (TV series), you may be blocked from editing. Bbb23 (talk) 13:10, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

I suggest that you check the Instagram pages mentioned in my edit. This has been confirmed. Please do your due diligence. AbstractLakx (talk) 13:11, 20 May 2022 (UTC)Reply

Concern regarding Draft:Daniel Barnett edit

  Hello, AbstractLakx. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Daniel Barnett, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 07:36, 30 October 2022 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: G-A-Y Late (December 12) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Nagol0929 were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Nagol0929 (talk) 12:54, 12 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
Hi,
Many thanks for your assessment.
I feel that the article is written in a similar vein to that of its approved sister articles G-A-Y and Heaven (nightclub).
Please could you advise on how it needs to be updated to meet your thresholds, as it has been modelled on the above two articles closely, as they are innately linked. The referencing has been matched too - it has proven very hard to reference all three pages due to their community-based following. I added as many news articles as possible - I shall add more.
It is entirely not my intention to write an advertisement for a now closed establishment.
Many thanks. AbstractLakx (talk) 03:20, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply
After speaking on live chat, I will be making some edits and adding further sources where possible to reduce promotional sentiment and add sourcing from the club's earlier existence where possible.
I will resubmit shortly. Many thanks. AbstractLakx (talk) 03:37, 13 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

AfC notification: Draft:G-A-Y Late has a new comment edit

 
I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:G-A-Y Late. Thanks! Lewcm Talk to me! 12:36, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: G-A-Y Late (December 22) edit

 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lewcm was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Lewcm Talk to me! 12:38, 22 December 2023 (UTC)Reply