User talk:A. B./May 2008

Latest comment: 15 years ago by Rianon Burnet in topic The Satanic spammer
Archive This page is a chronological archive of past discussions from User talk:A. B. for the month of May 2008. Exchanges spilling over from late April or into early June may have been retained elsewhere to avoid breaking their continuity.

In order to preserve the record of past discussions, the contents of this page should be preserved in their current form.

Please do NOT make new edits to this page. If you wish to make new comments or re-open an old discussion thread, please do so on the User talk:A. B. page.

If necessary, copy the relevant discussion thread to the user talk:A. B. page and then add your comments there.


Note: many of these were archived out of chronological order! edit

Request for guidance edit

Could you take a look at Wikipedia talk:WPSPAM#http://spam.welcomehere.org/ and let me know your opinion on it? No one had commented on it thus far, so I'm guessing it was missed by most in the rush of submittals to the page. --- Barek (talkcontribs) - 15:23, 30 April 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks. It looks like this is starting to unravel a bit for the spammer. I added to the report.
You're doing great work with spam and we really appreciate all you're doing. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 17:11, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

May be worth an eye edit

On this one cheers --Herby talk thyme 10:45, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks, --A. B. (talkcontribs) 16:53, 2 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


External Links edit

Next time you add a spam external link you may be warned or blocked. Adding external links that are not used as a resource or reference or not prohibited on wikipedia.org. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 24.117.64.57 (talkcontribs) 06:04, 4 May 2008


For background on this editor's history of spamming and trolling using other IPs and user names, see:
--A. B. (talkcontribs) 21:25, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Also:
--A. B. (talkcontribs) 21:30, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Penguins and vulcanoes edit

User:RRvolcanica who owns photovolcanica.com has given permission for the wiki to make free use of the images on that website (see the WP:Volcano talk page). Has this been recognised officially? How are these images appropriately marked, so their license and source are clear and so that they do not get deleted? Snowman (talk) 20:53, 11 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

See Wikiproject:Birds page for current status. Issue probably resolvable by general designation of all images on site in 200x300 pixel resolution (standard preview image size) as useable under GFDL. Larger images are not to be released under GFDL. The 200x300 size should be fine for authors and they can link to picture url on website with note that larger version not GFDL in picture info. Upload to commons is not practical for the large number of images potentially involved. Awaiting comment and still need to amend website page accordingly. RRvolcanica (talk) 11:08, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

4.244.36.110‎ socks edit

Just so you know, the 86. IPs you posted aren't socks of 4.244.36.110‎, they're socks of 81.129.201.88 (talk · contribs) who got a bit annoyed after I blocked him - note the same type of vandalism. Hut 8.5 17:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for the clarification. I was willing to help 4.244.36.110 guy but my patience is wearing very thin. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 17:39, 13 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

thatsqingdao edit

Here's a link to my original report. I guess I didn't do enough research into the cross-wiki spamming. However, note that this report includes two alternative domain names that redirect to thatsqingdao, which should also be blacklisted. Thanks, OhNoitsJamie Talk 22:04, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Jamie, you've been very diligent and taken a lot of abuse over time on this one. I appreciate all you've done. See the e-mail I sent you earlier today. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 23:53, 14 May 2008 (UTC)Reply


Unlisting of blacklisted website edit

Hello, where's the proper place to ask for a blacklisted website to become unlisted. Would appreciate any help. Thank you, Wfgh66 (talk) 14:50, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I just left a note at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#Proposed unlisting of Priory-of-Sion.com declining your request not more than 2 minutes ago. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 14:52, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Why did you decline the request? The website has been used on WP for years, and constitutes source material for many books and documentaries. It was blacklisted for political, not content, reasons. Thank you, Wfgh66 (talk) 14:57, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
You're not supposed to add links to your own site. See WP:COI and WP:SPAM.
As for your very serious allegations of admin abuse in the blacklisting of your domain, I suggest you present any hard evidence of this at MediaWiki talk:Spam-blacklist#Proposed unlisting of Priory-of-Sion.com. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 15:02, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
I need to clarify my earlier statements, the website got blacklisted because I was linking to it, that's what I meant by it being blacklisted for political not content, reasons. O was not blaming any WP administrator for my past mistakes. I hear that blacklisted websites do get unlisted and that is what I am requesting, since several WP editors would use it as a source, and I would unequivocally promise not to break WP Policies and Rules again. Thank you, Wfgh66 (talk) 15:09, 16 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

USS New Mexico edit

There has been no change to the christening date for the USS New Mexico. But yet 216.54.92.149 (talk · contribs) used my old reference with the January 2009 date. And just because one good user used this IP address in the past, does not mean that the same user used it this time. It was probably somebody else. I will modify it to warn1 though. ~ WikiDon (talk) 21:04, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

OK, thanks. Odd that two different users using this IP, one a a constructive editor and one a vandal, would pick submarine articles. I see the IP traceroutes to a cable modem in Norfolk area; since that's where the shipyard is, perhaps that explains the coincidence. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 21:10, 22 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Spam-blacklist edit

Have added a supplement, a general " how-to: of sorts. Improve if needed, ect. A shortcut has been created WP:BLACK. cheers--Hu12 (talk) 10:41, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I'll look more later but this is impressive/useful - reason for posting here - I think we should steal it for Meta? :) Cheers --Herby talk thyme 10:46, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply
Excellent!! Thank you. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 19:38, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

Cutting Edge Creations edit

The Cutting Edge Creations page was flagged for notability and potential conflict of interest around a month ago. Thus far no one has posted any complaints in the discussion section. What is the process for getting these flags removed? 68.178.45.82 (talk) 16:08, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I dug around today, found some reliable references from notable publications (newspapers) that established notability and worked them into the article. I also worked on the article's neutrality some. --A. B. (talkcontribs) 19:40, 23 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

The Satanic spammer edit

Thanks for your help and warning to him. He did it again [1] Sticky Parkin 02:17, 25 May 2008 (UTC)Reply

I have been out for several months for personal reasons. However when i do get to return to wikipedia more regularly i will make it my priority to help with the encyclopedia effort and refrain from using it as a personal website.


Thank you for bringing this to my attention Rianon Burnet 17:58, 30 May 2008 (UTC)Reply