98.115.173.240

About the article about the parliamentary elections in Ukraine

Hello! I want to notify you that the edit you added to the article is incorrect. The party’s leader at the moment is Boris Kolesnikov, not Yevgeny Murayev. As proof, you give me an article in which there is not a word about Murayev being appointed leader of the party. Yes, he is the leader of the list. But in the infobox there are leaders of LOTS, not lists. A vivid example of this is the article about the previous parliamentary elections. In the infobox, the leader of “Self-help” is Sadovy, but in fact he was in 50th places on the list. I hope that my comment will change something in your opinion. Thank. --CatStepan2006 (talk) 06:49, 20 July 2019 (UTC)

Do you read what I said at all? --CatStepan2006 (talk) 01:26, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Actually it’s you who doesn’t read what I wrote to you, I perfectly read what you wrote and it’s incorrect and unsourced. It looks you failed to read what I wrote. See talk page and previous edits on 2019 Ukrainian parliamentary election. -98.115.173.240 (talk) 04:10, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Frederiksen Cabinet

Seems like there is something that you are misunderstanding. The current list of parties is written in prose, this is not something that is appropriate to an infobox. This is why I keep changing it to a list, as I have stated in the reasoning. It seems to me that the only reason that you are keeping the current form is to keep your "preferred method". Stop changing things for no reason. PS. Yes, of course I want to keep the sources, that is the whole point of Wikipedia, you can't just go around deleting them because you don't like them. Skjoldbro (talk) 09:47, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

It actually looks like you are the one misunderstanding the situation. The way it is currently is a normal format and it was the initial one. It’s not me who is reverting, it’s you because you want your preferred method" of format. It’s you who needs to stop deleting it. You can’t just revert things due to your dislike of it. 98.115.173.240 (talk) 16:13, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

No, it isn’t. When presenning information in an infobox, it should be presented as a list, not in prose, which what you keep changing it to. Skjoldbro (talk) 16:48, 21 July 2019 (UTC)

Actually that’s incorrect, but, please find an article on Wikipedia that states that in this particular situation it must be a list. 98.115.173.240 (talk) 01:12, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

Help:Infobox#What should an infobox not contain?, there you go. I don't even understand how you have come to the conclusion that it should be presented in prose. Is there even any page on Wikipedia, which supports your outrageous claim? It is very simple, things are being listed, and should therefore be presented in a LIST, I mean even the related page of the Folketing has them as lists, showing you that it is indeed not "my preferred method", but the standard. Skjoldbro (talk) 06:19, 22 July 2019 (UTC)

---