March 2023 edit

  Hello, I'm Discospinster. Wikipedia is written by people who have a wide diversity of opinions, but we try hard to make sure articles have a neutral point of view. Your recent edit seemed less than neutral and has been removed. If you think this was a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. ... discospinster talk 19:21, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

The non-neutral language is the original language. This is from the perspective of the Polish 2nd Republic 91.217.105.54 (talk) 19:22, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
Encyclopedia articles are not written from the perspective of the subject, they are written with neutral language. ... discospinster talk 19:23, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
Everything is from a perspective. Documentation is a perspective.
The original language states Poland's "most important" trading partner was Germany. How is that neutral exactly?
The lands Poland regained in independence were originally settles by Lechite Slavs. They didn't "belong" to Prussians or Unified Germany. 91.217.105.54 (talk) 19:30, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

  You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Second Polish Republic. This means that you are repeatedly changing content back to how you think it should be although other editors disagree. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus, rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Points to note:

  1. Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made;
  2. Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes and work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases, it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Justarandomamerican (talk) If you're here to build a encyclopedia, have a nice day doing so! 19:37, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. π‘­π’Šπ’π’Žπ’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’”π’” (talk) 19:46, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:91.217.105.54 reported by User:Justarandomamerican (Result: ). Thank you. Justarandomamerican (talk) If you're here to build a encyclopedia, have a nice day doing so! 19:49, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply

March 2023 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β ... discospinster talk 20:15, 5 March 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion edit

  Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring#User:91.217.105.54 reported by User:Czello (Result: ). Thank you. β€” Czello (music) 12:42, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply

May 2024 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for edit warring, as done at Kaszanka.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β Bbb23 (talk) 13:55, 8 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for edit warring.
During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful, you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Β Drmies (talk) 14:37, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
I did not edit war. The consensus was the onus of the editor who was making the change.
None of the comments in the undo were addressed. 91.217.105.54 (talk) 16:38, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

91.217.105.54 (block log β€’ active blocks β€’ global blocks β€’ contribs β€’ deleted contribs β€’ filter log β€’ creation log β€’ change block settings β€’ unblock β€’ checkuser (log))


Request reason:

I did not edit war. The consensus was the onus of the editor who was making the change.Β ::None of the comments in the undo were addressed.Β ::

Decline reason:

Clear edit warring. The onus is on you to show a clear consensus on the article's talk page. Yamla (talk) 17:23, 15 May 2024 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.