71.49.192.248

Another sock of User:Kompress0

— Jacona (talk) 14:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

What are you saying? You don't like someone following you around reverting your edits? 71.49.192.248 (talk) 14:51, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

I have blocked you for 48 hours. PhilKnight (talk) 15:03, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Yeah but see you're not privy to the whole situation. Jacona and wolfchild have been harassing me for months, the only difference is they're established users so they get away with it. 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:05, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock Request Too

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

I'd be glad to go back to being a contributing member here, if Jacona and wolfchild will get over their spite and leave my valid edits alone 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:07, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Requests with personal attacks are not considered. 331dot (talk) 15:12, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Unblock Three

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

You know it would save a LOT of time in the future for Jacona and wolfchild just to be instructed to leave my valid edits alone 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:13, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

See WP:NOTTHEM. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You don't need to sign your request both inside and outside it. 331dot (talk) 15:21, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

Yeah but in this case it IS them. A few users that are benefiting from bias keep reverting my valid edits out of spite and getting away with it. 71.49.192.248 (talk) 15:36, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

This approach isn't working for you. Yamla (talk) 15:59, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You obviously haven't read WP:NOTTHEM or my comments here for that matter. You were blocked for what you did, not for what others did. Your request should only address what you did. If you wish to report the inappropriate conduct of others, you may do so once unblocked(though I would advise against it). 331dot (talk) 15:46, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Unblock request

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

71.49.192.248 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

---

Request reason:

"Yamla said: This approach isn't working for you." To be fair, I also tried being constructive and that didn't work either so... Did you ever consider the problem IS the other users? 71.49.192.248 (talk) 20:48, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

• the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
• the block is no longer necessary because you
  1. understand what you have been blocked for,
  2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
  3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. TPA revoked for time-wasting. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:17, 8 December 2022 (UTC)

---

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

---