71.198.89.109

March 2019

Hello, I'm StartTerminal. I noticed that you recently removed content from Space Invaders without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. startTerminal {haha wow talk page | waste_of_space#4023 on discord} 20:57, 17 March 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at PBR. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. KB3035583^talk 22:36, 21 March 2019 (UTC)

April 2019

Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles as you apparently did to Pocket pet. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. - FlightTime (open channel) 17:14, 21 April 2019 (UTC)

Welcome!

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions so far. I hope you like the place and decide to stay.

Here are some links to pages you may find useful:

• Contributing to Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• Simplified Manual of Style

You don't have to log in to read or edit articles on Wikipedia, but if you wish to acquire additional privileges, you can simply create a named account. It's free, requires no personal information, and lets you Create new pages and Upload images.

Disambigation pages

Please note that disambiguation pages like Peep are meant to help readers find a specific existing article quickly and easily. For that reason, they have guidelines that are different from articles. From the Wikipedia:Disambiguation dos and don'ts you should:

• Only list articles that readers might reasonably be looking for
• Use short sentence fragment descriptions, with no punctuation at the end
• Use exactly one navigable link ("blue link") in each entry
• Only add a "red link" if used in existing articles, and include a "blue link" to an appropriate article
• Do not pipe links (unless style requires it) – keep the full title of the article visible
• Do not insert external links or references
• Do not add articles to acronym or initials disambiguation pages unless the person or entity is widely known by that name (in which case it should be stated in the linked article).

Thank you. Leschnei (talk) 02:00, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Seriously, stop with the redirect requests

You should take the hint from the fact that the last 5 requests you made have been declines. Redirects are not necessary for every random thing that pops into your head, and it is getting disruptive to have to continually close every one of your requests. Please read this page here about what redirects are supposed to be used for. Also, spend some more time doing more productive work at Wikipedia, and learn how it works before diving into the more arcane aspects of it like redirects. You obviously aren't doing it right, so find something else to work on that will not involve someone having to clean up after you. --Jayron32 19:11, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Okay. 71.198.89.109 (talk) 19:22, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Just so you know (@Jayron32:) I did search for "Misrahi Jew" and "Linkin Logs". 71.198.89.109 (talk) 19:24, 16 May 2019 (UTC)

Even a broken clock is correct twice a day. It doesn't mean you're doing things right because, by pure dumb luck and random chance, you happened to hit a few good examples. Please just stop and instead learn how redirects are supposed to work. Or, you know, create an account and make redirects yourself. --Jayron32 12:16, 17 May 2019 (UTC)

Recent edit to Vegetarianism

Hello, and thank you for your recent contribution. I appreciate the effort you made for our project, but unfortunately I had to undo your edit because I believe the article was better before you made that change. Feel free to contact me directly if you have any questions. Thank you! ―Susmuffin ^Talk 22:43, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

Your "incorrect" edit stated: "products that rely upon by-products of animal slaughter such as some cheeses, sugar..." Cheeses don't come from slaughtered animals, and sugar doesn't come from animals. --Zefr (talk) 02:44, 11 June 2019 (UTC)

June 2019

Please stop your disruptive editing.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Vegetarianism, you may be blocked from editing. Several editors have removed your content; please stop or you will be blocked for disruptive editing. Zefr (talk) 23:08, 10 June 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to use disruptive, inappropriate or hard-to-read formatting, as you did at Non-Fiction (film), you may be blocked from editing. There is a Wikipedia Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. 153.229.78.28 (talk) 13:18, 13 June 2019 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Ice cream cake.  I dream of horses  If you reply here, please ping me by adding {{U|I dream of horses}} to your message  (talk to me) (My edits) @ 00:24, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

What are you calling vandalism? I dream of horses 71.198.89.109 (talk) 00:29, 17 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swordfish as food (June 24)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted because it included copyrighted content, which is not permitted on Wikipedia. You are welcome to write an article on the subject, but please do not use copyrighted work.

• Draft:Swordfish as food may be deleted at any time unless the copied text is removed. Copyrighted work cannot be allowed to remain on Wikipedia.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page. or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Praxidicae (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Hello, 71.198.89.109! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Praxidicae (talk) 18:55, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Swordfish as food (June 24)

Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Praxidicae was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.

Praxidicae (talk) 19:00, 24 June 2019 (UTC)

July 2019

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Melianthus major has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Melianthus major was changed by 71.198.89.109 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.894999 on 2019-07-27T20:48:31+00:00

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 20:48, 27 July 2019 (UTC)

Please stop making test edits to Wikipedia. It is considered vandalism, which, under Wikipedia policy, can lead to being blocked from editing. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 02:35, 28 July 2019 (UTC)

August 2019

Hello, I'm Aranya. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Tater tots, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. —Aranya (talk) 04:58, 15 August 2019 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Draft:Swordfish as food concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Swordfish as food, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 25 November 2019 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Swordfish as food

Hello, 71.198.89.109. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Swordfish as food".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! JMHamo (talk) 09:47, 25 December 2019 (UTC)

April 2020

Please do not add or change content without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Vaselineeeeeeee^★★★ 02:13, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia and thank you for your contributions. I am glad to see that you are discussing a topic. However, as a general rule, talk pages such as Talk:Spaghetti and meatballs are for discussion related to improving the article in specific ways based on reliable sources and the project policies and guidelines, not for general discussion about the topic or unrelated topics, or statements based on your thoughts or feelings. If you have specific questions about certain topics, consider visiting our reference desk and asking them there instead of on article talk pages. Thank you. SummerPhD^v2.0 03:59, 28 April 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

August 2020

Hello, I'm William Harris. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Mongrel have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. None of your edits were helpful, and some linked to incorrect articles. William Harristalk 22:11, 27 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

---