September 2020 edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to In Search of Dr. Seuss, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:35, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please do not add or change content, as you did at The Wubbulous World of Dr. Seuss, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Binksternet (talk) 22:36, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by adding your personal analysis or synthesis into articles, as you did at Dr. Seuss on the Loose, you may be blocked from editing. Binksternet (talk) 22:38, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Postcards from Buster. Binksternet (talk) 23:07, 10 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

 
You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf(talk) 00:24, 11 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

Recent edits edit

Please stop systematically changing the lead of various video game articles. Your edits are not helpful at all. For instance, rearranging platforms in the infobox, wikilinking video game are all absolutely unneeded edits. OceanHok (talk) 12:17, 25 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

September 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm OceanHok. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Dexter's Laboratory: Mandark's Lab?, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at the tutorial on citing sources. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. OceanHok (talk) 04:30, 26 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Temple of Yog, you may be blocked from editing. -- Cyberlink420 (talk) 19:28, 29 September 2020 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at Barbie Nail Designer. -Thibbs (talk) 02:28, 1 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

Pac-Man edit

I've reverted just about all of your edits to various Pac-Man articles. Please don't add that kind of stuff into pages, that doesn't follow WP:VG/MOS and is just mindless trivia. You've been told not to do this by other editors on other articles, judging from your talk page and contributions. Please stop doing this. Namcokid47 (Contribs) 21:46, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply

October 2020 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 23:45, 9 October 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

February 2021 edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you remove or blank page content or templates from Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary, as you did at Pac-Man World 2. Namcokid47 17:49, 8 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Super Mario World, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. Ashleyyoursmile! 15:58, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- Sergecross73 msg me 18:32, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.