January 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm SSSB. I noticed that you recently removed content from Daniel Ricciardo without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. SSSB (talk) 17:47, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Daniel Ricciardo, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. SSSB (talk) 17:53, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

You are removing the fact that Ricciardo is Italian-Australian. By all means change the wording, but Ricciardo's Italian-Australian status must remain (note this doesn't apply on the pages for Hamilton and Schumacher, also note WP:OTHERCONTENT) SSSB (talk) 17:56, 2 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Critical warning edit

Hello, regarding your edit summary that stated Stop it or I'll take it to court (diff), the following warning is now in effect:

  Your recent edits could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. El_C 11:19, 3 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

January 2022 edit

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 16:49, 6 January 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.165.235.165 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Disruptive editing? You make so many false positives you could be a metaphor for failure. 62.165.235.165 (talk) 17:11, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

I am declining your unblock request because it does not address the reason for your block, or because it is inadequate for other reasons. To be unblocked, you must convince the reviewing administrator(s) that

  • the block is not necessary to prevent damage or disruption to Wikipedia, or
  • the block is no longer necessary because you
    1. understand what you have been blocked for,
    2. will not continue to cause damage or disruption, and
    3. will make useful contributions instead.

Please read the guide to appealing blocks for more information. 331dot (talk) 17:18, 7 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.165.235.165 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Only one legal threat, not enough to block me.62.165.235.165 (talk) 11:33, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

Block extended to 2 weeks for deliberately wasting our time. Note that you (you the person) aren't permitted to edit Wikipedia even once the block expires, until you withdraw your legal threat (or your legal action is complete). Yamla (talk) 11:46, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Withdrawing legal threat edit

My legal threat has been withdrawn. --62.165.235.165 (talk) 13:32, 8 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

 
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

62.165.235.165 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I've withdrawn my legal threat, please reduce my block back to 1 week 62.165.235.165 (talk) 12:27, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

Decline reason:

It would probably be best to appeal this block from one of your accounts. SQLQuery Me! 00:37, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You still need to deal with your personal attacks and trolling. --Yamla (talk) 12:35, 9 January 2022 (UTC)Reply

I have modified your block to reflect your withdrawn legal threat. The rest of the block will still need to be addressed. SQLQuery Me! 00:27, 10 January 2022 (UTC)Reply