This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61wi17 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, I want to be unblocked, I am really sorry for my mistake, I am new in Wikipedia and that's why I created a mistake, I sent a ticket for unblock my account with : d7a79d4da6a261de5f4721737aa3292a I need to be unblocked because I want to write and edit articles for myself, my team & everyone, I know and I understand the reason of my blocked from admins, but I need my account thank you for understanding.

Decline reason:

This does not convince me you understand our policies and guidelines. In particular, it sounds like you plan to write articles about yourself, your team, and your company. Yamla (talk) 10:02, 4 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61wi17 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello, i want to be unblocked because i want to write so many articles

Decline reason:

You demonstrate no understanding of how you came to be blocked nor what you will do to prevent it in the future. — Daniel Case (talk) 06:55, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

61wi17 (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

Hello ! i want to be unblocked because i want to write articles in the future, I'm sorry for that, I'm new in Wikipedia so i wrote an article for my company and i used some text that those can advertise my company, but I did not want my company to be advertised, i used those text for my company and I did not know that it was going to be a advertising text because i did not read the "Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia", so I'm really sorry for that and i promise i will read "Ten simple rules for editing Wikipedia" for anything on Wikipedia, so after that, i published my article twice with that text then i blocked for spam and absolutely advertising.

Decline reason:

That you had been told in clear English not to remove the declined unblock requests once already, then did so again, raises too many concerns about your ability to interact with guidance in the future and thus avoid issues. Nosebagbear (talk) 11:09, 3 February 2022 (UTC)Reply


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Again, you ARE NOT ALLOWED TO REMOVE DECLINED UNBLOCK REQUESTS. Lavalizard101 (talk) 21:49, 29 January 2022 (UTC)Reply