July 2022
editBecause my IP address has been blocked for writing the true statement that the Biden campaign created the Coronavirus, I will say more here. I understand that Wikipedia has to maintain its free encyclopedia decorum and that is why I moved to the talk page for the Inflation Reduction Act, however my edits there were reverted as well. So I will just repeat that I am trying to improve the page by adding background to the story. The reason for Joe Manchin's turnaround this past week is simply that his usual handlers are not there to supervise him. He and Chuck Schumer are racing to pass this outlandishly expensive "anti-inflation" bill before they return and it is in the interest of literally the entire world (outside of the astroturfers representing the Biden administration - i.e. the Coronavirus death squad themselves) to put a stop to this. The fact that the Biden campaign created the Coronavirus is actually known to everyone in Congress and it is the obligation of the public (including the editors of Wikipedia) to hold them responsible for it. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 20:13, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- This is basically money that would all go into covering up the real story of the Coronavirus, so it seems like a pertinent issue for Wikipedia to address. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 20:36, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Somewhere in the page needs to be the fact that the "secret" negotiations made between Manchin and Schumer were done without the supervision of the people who have held the Biden administration responsible for the creation of the Coronavirus for the last 15 months and that this is what the nearly trillion dollar "anti-inflation" bill represents. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 20:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- No, that’s not how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. Hope this helps. Happy editing! Dr.Pinsky (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Most of the content on Wikipedia is managed by astroturfers in the US government and they have refused to allow anything that runs counter to the Biden administration's narrative about the Coronavirus on Wikipedia, just as they have done in the media. Although your comment is a reply to my edits about the Inflation Reduction Act, I'm sure that it is supposed to be interpreted as a comment on my edits to Talk:COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China as well. I understand that it may not be appropriate to add the background that I have provided for the Inflation Reduction Act page, so I have made suggestions for the COVID-19 pandemic in mainland China page so that Wikipedia can catch up with the real world. As I've written, everyone in Congress is already aware of the fact that the Biden campaign created the Coronavirus and is framing China for it, in addition to covering up on the order of 10 million deaths in China. The fact that no page on Wikipedia even hints at the possibility that the Biden campaign created the Coronavirus (but does so repeatedly for the Trump campaign for instance) is an indication of the agenda of the astroturfers controlling Wikipedia's content. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:45, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- No, that’s not how Wikipedia works. Wikipedia does not publish original research. Its content is determined by previously published information rather than the beliefs or experiences of editors. Even if you are sure something is true, it must be verifiable before you can add it. Hope this helps. Happy editing! Dr.Pinsky (talk) 08:20, 2 August 2022 (UTC)
- Somewhere in the page needs to be the fact that the "secret" negotiations made between Manchin and Schumer were done without the supervision of the people who have held the Biden administration responsible for the creation of the Coronavirus for the last 15 months and that this is what the nearly trillion dollar "anti-inflation" bill represents. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 20:51, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Andrevan@ 16:58, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- In what way is my edit unconstructive? This is supposed to be an encyclopedia and not a government public relations board. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:00, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Your edit was not constructive because you added or changed content in the article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Besides your edit was unexplained. If you want to make a change like this, I encourage you to discuss it on article’s talk page. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- What I wrote on the talk page was described as "disruptive editing" because Andrevan considers it "obvious" that what I wrote is not true. I know that what I am writing is true and the editors need to tone down their threats to block me so that I can get the message through. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Because article talk pages are not forum. keep in mind that even on the talk page of an article, you should limit your discussion to improving the article. I've left you a welcome message on your talk page with some helpful information. Cheers. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:54, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- What I wrote on the talk page was described as "disruptive editing" because Andrevan considers it "obvious" that what I wrote is not true. I know that what I am writing is true and the editors need to tone down their threats to block me so that I can get the message through. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:35, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Your edit was not constructive because you added or changed content in the article, but you didn't provide a reliable source. Besides your edit was unexplained. If you want to make a change like this, I encourage you to discuss it on article’s talk page. Thanks. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:25, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Andrevan@ 17:12, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Again, these are facts that I am writing. I am trying to improve the article and that is why I wrote on the talk page instead of making another edit. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:19, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- It's not a fact that the "Biden campaign created the coronavirus." Andrevan@ 17:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- That is a fact actually. Again, if your editors could find a way to finesse these true statements so that they are suitable for your free encyclopedia, then they should do so. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nope. Sorry. You need to align your statements to WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NPOV, etc. but it's obvious that this isn't true info. Andrevan@ 17:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- See my statement below. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:30, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Nope. Sorry. You need to align your statements to WP:RS, WP:V, WP:NPOV, etc. but it's obvious that this isn't true info. Andrevan@ 17:26, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- I encourage you and other editors to exercise your critical thinking skills. For example, asking questions like - "is the death rate from the Coronavirus in China .1% the death rate of the Coronavirus in the United States, as Wikipedia itself reports, when Wuhan, the central transportation hub of China is the epicenter of the pandemic, or is the US government perhaps covering up the number of deaths there?". 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:28, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- Please provide a reliable source that supports the change you want to be made. And please leave personal attacks out of it. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:46, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- That is a fact actually. Again, if your editors could find a way to finesse these true statements so that they are suitable for your free encyclopedia, then they should do so. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:24, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- It's not a fact that the "Biden campaign created the coronavirus." Andrevan@ 17:20, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
- What I wrote earlier about Biden was dismissed as "obviously" not true because of an obvious bias on the part of Andrevan and it is not a "personal attack" for me to point it out. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 17:53, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
Welcome!
editHello and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page Inflation Reduction Act of 2022 did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.
If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Introduction tutorial
- Contributing to Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Help pages
- Simplified Manual of Style
- Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or . Again, welcome. Dr.Pinsky (talk) 17:49, 30 July 2022 (UTC)
July 2022
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. firefly ( t · c ) 18:01, 30 July 2022 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
October 2022
editHello, I'm BlueNoise. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Neurodiversity have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. BlueNoise (talk) 20:39, 6 October 2022 (UTC)
Important notice
editThis is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.
You have shown interest in COVID-19, broadly construed. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.
To opt out of receiving messages like this one, place {{Ds/aware}}
on your user talk page and specify in the template the topic areas that you would like to opt out of alerts about. For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.
~~lol1VNIO🎌 (I made a mistake? talk to me) 06:18, 2 December 2022 (UTC)
December 2022
editHello, I'm Boud. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. In this edit, you tried to override the decision of an uninvolved editor to close an unproductive discussion. If you wish to add coronavirus-related material to this encyclopedia, then you will first have to show that you have good sources and that you have read related material that establishes the normal meanings of words. Please read the article: history of coronavirus. The coronavirus has been known since 1936, before Joe Biden was born. Boud (talk) 00:43, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
- I was referring to COVID-19 and even the other editor responding to me could understand that. If you cannot spend the time to read what has actually been written, then you should not be closing the discussion to block other people from reading it. 50.230.201.134 (talk) 21:44, 4 December 2022 (UTC)
June 2024
edit{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}
. Bbb23 (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2024 (UTC)- If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.
This is the discussion page for an IP user, identified by the user's IP address. Many IP addresses change periodically, and are often shared by several users. If you are an IP user, you may create an account or log in to avoid future confusion with other IP users. Registering also hides your IP address. |