Your submission at Articles for creation: Karam (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 12:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
 
Hello, 23.90.66.8! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! – Kilaseell - Message me! - 12:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karam (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 12:33, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Karam (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Kilaseell was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 12:37, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaci Lennox (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Dan arndt (talk) 12:43, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Kaci Lennox (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:19, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sucker Punch 2 (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:21, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sucker Punch 2 (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by KylieTastic was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:24, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sucker Punch 2 (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
KylieTastic (talk) 14:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sucker Punch 2 (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Just disruptive
KylieTastic (talk) 14:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forever My Girl 2(2023) (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 14:44, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forever My Girl 2(2023) (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:45, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forever My Girl 2(2023) (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 14:48, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forever My Girl 2(2023) (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 14:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Stop submitting unsourced drafts to AfC especially as I expect they are hoaxes KylieTastic (talk) 14:50, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forever My Girl 2(2023) (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Vanderwaalforces was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
Vanderwaalforces (talk) 14:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Forever My Girl 2(2023) (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by Kilaseell was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia. The comment the reviewer left was: Do not submit this again.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 14:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Sucker Punch 2

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Sucker Punch 2, is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 14:51, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Forever My Girl 2(2023)

edit
 

Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing hoaxes, such as Draft:Forever My Girl 2(2023), is considered to be vandalism and is prohibited. If you are interested in how accurate Wikipedia is, a more constructive test method would be to try to find inaccurate statements that are already in Wikipedia—and then to correct them if possible. If you would like to make test edits, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KylieTastic (talk) 15:00, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bodyguard(2023 film) by Ben Nash (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 15:28, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bodyguard(2023 film) by Ben Nash (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was:  The comment the reviewer left was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 15:31, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. Final warning as just posting hoaxes and wasting everyone's time KylieTastic (talk) 15:32, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bodyguard(2023 film) by Ben Nash (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kilaseell was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Kilaseell - Message me! - 15:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Bodyguard(2023 film) by Ben Nash (November 8)

edit
 
Your recent article submission has been rejected. If you have further questions, you can ask at the Articles for creation help desk or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help. The reason left by KylieTastic was: This topic is not sufficiently notable for inclusion in Wikipedia.
KylieTastic (talk) 15:36, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 15:47, 8 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dean Malenko (November 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:53, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dean Malenko (November 21)

edit
 
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by WikiOriginal-9 was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
~WikiOriginal-9~ (talk) 20:57, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply

November 2023

edit
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 month for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Bbb23 (talk) 23:16, 21 November 2023 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

July 2024

edit

  Hello, I'm --WikiUser1234945--. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Marco van Ginkel—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 15:45, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Marco van Ginkel. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. --WikiUser1234945-- (talk) 15:47, 31 July 2024 (UTC)Reply