Recent edit to Richard Corrigan

edit

  Hello. I noticed that you recently made a contribution to the Richard Corrigan article that seemed to be a test. Your test worked! However, test edits on live articles disrupt Wikipedia and may confuse readers. If you want more practice editing, the sandbox is the best place to do so. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Melonkelon (talk) 05:37, 16 November 2015 (UTC)Reply

January 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Dcirovic. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Bluetooth has been undone because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Dcirovic (talk) 19:37, 8 January 2016 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

April 2016

edit

  Hello, I'm Oshwah. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Georges Clemenceau— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:46, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Georges Clemenceau with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. ~Oshwah~(talk) (contribs) 14:47, 8 April 2016 (UTC)Reply

June 2016

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Nando's has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • For help, take a look at the introduction.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this message: Nando's was changed by 213.205.251.60 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.953752 on 2016-06-23T21:38:16+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 21:38, 23 June 2016 (UTC)Reply

November 2017

edit
 

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Judas Iscariot has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:11, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Thomas Aquinas. Your edits continue to appear to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

  • If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
  • ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
  • If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
  • The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Thomas Aquinas was changed by 213.205.251.60 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.911582 on 2017-11-23T13:13:07+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:13, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Betty Kershaw, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Betty Kershaw was changed by 213.205.251.60 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.95738 on 2017-11-23T13:24:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:24, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Ian Kershaw.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Ian Kershaw was changed by 213.205.251.60 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.944175 on 2017-11-23T13:26:06+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 13:26, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply

 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistent vandalism.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  -- ferret (talk) 13:48, 23 November 2017 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

May 2018

edit

  Welcome to Wikipedia. We appreciate your contributions, but in one of your recent edits to Estuary English, it appears that you have added original research, which is against Wikipedia's policies. Original research refers to material—such as facts, allegations, ideas, and personal experiences—for which no reliable, published sources exist; it also encompasses combining published sources in a way to imply something that none of them explicitly say. Please be prepared to cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Nardog (talk) 13:41, 28 May 2018 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

July 2018

edit

  Hello, I'm IronGargoyle. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Pat Parker (footballer)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk or my talk page. Thank you. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:53, 21 July 2018 (UTC)Reply