203.29.104.16

November 2016

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to Andrew Barron has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: Andrew Barron was changed by 203.29.104.16 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.900793 on 2016-11-10T23:07:18+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 23:07, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Jack Aubrey. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Materialscientist (talk) 23:12, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Andrew Barron, you may be blocked from editing. Donner60 (talk) 23:14, 10 November 2016 (UTC)

May 2018

Hello, I'm CLCStudent. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Battle of the Cedars have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help Desk. Thanks. CLCStudent (talk) 01:39, 8 May 2018 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bailey McNee (July 31)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Enterprisey was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bailey McNee and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Bailey McNee, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
• If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
• You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Enterprisey (talk!) 05:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Hello, 203.29.104.16! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Enterprisey (talk!) 05:48, 31 July 2018 (UTC)

Adding names that aren't remotely notable

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:23, 14 November 2018 (UTC)

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Pseudoscience. Binksternet (talk) 05:03, 20 August 2020 (UTC)

---