202.0.106.130

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to De La Salle College Ashfield. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. — madman bum and angel 04:46, 9 August 2007 (UTC)

October 2007

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Bob McMullan page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 03:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Please do not add nonsense to Wikipedia, as you did to the Simon Crean page. It is considered vandalism. If you would like to experiment, use the sandbox. Thank you. -David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 03:55, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

Please stop. If you continue to vandalize pages, as you did to Talk:Harry Quick, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. -David Schaich ^Talk/_Cont 03:57, 19 October 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

November 2007

Your recent edit to Daryl Somers (diff) was reverted by an automated bot. The edit was identified as adding either test edits, vandalism, or link spam to the page or having an inappropriate edit summary. If you want to experiment, please use the preview button while editing or consider using the sandbox. If this revert was in error, please contact the bot operator. If you made an edit that removed a large amount of content, try doing smaller edits instead. Thanks! // VoABot II (talk) 01:25, 25 November 2007 (UTC)

December 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to War of Currents. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. JForget 00:58, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

This is your last warning.
The next time you vandalize a page, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. KnowledgeOfSelf | talk 01:00, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. We invite everyone to contribute constructively to our encyclopedia. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing. However, unconstructive edits, such as those you made to War of Currents, are considered vandalism and immediately reverted. If you continue in this manner you may be blocked from editing without further warning. Please stop, and consider improving rather than damaging the work of others. Thedjatclubrock :) ^(T/C) 01:16, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make any unconstructive edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant warnings.

You have been blocked from editing Wikipedia for a period of 48 hours as a result of your disruptive edits. You are free to make constructive edits after the block has expired, but please note that vandalism (including page blanking or addition of random text), spam, deliberate misinformation, privacy violations, personal attacks; and repeated, blatant violations of our policies concerning neutral point of view and biographies of living persons will not be tolerated.--JForget 01:18, 2 December 2007 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Maxine McKew. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Kuru ^talk 02:36, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

This is the last warning you will receive for your disruptive edits.
The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did to Maxine McKew, you will be blocked from editing. Kuru ^talk 02:39, 22 December 2007 (UTC)

January 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Renee Sands, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Renee Sands was changed by 202.0.106.130 (c) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-03T05:19:03+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 05:19, 3 January 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Nikki Webster, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot. Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you believe there has been a mistake and would like to report a false positive, please report it here and then remove this warning from your talk page. If your edit was not vandalism, please feel free to make your edit again after reporting it. The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Nikki Webster was changed by 202.0.106.130 (u) (t) making a minor change with obscenities on 2008-01-30T00:45:37+00:00. Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 00:45, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Johannes Brahms. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Michael Bednarek (talk) 02:14, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

February 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia, and thank you for your contributions. One of the core policies of Wikipedia is that articles should always be written from a neutral point of view. A contribution you made to Aboriginal Tent Embassy appears to carry a non-neutral point of view, and your edit may have been changed or reverted to correct the problem. Please remember to observe our core policies. Thank you. - Gimboid13 (talk) 02:09, 12 February 2008 (UTC)

April 2008

Please stop. If you continue to add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Street photography, you will be blocked from editing. SchuminWeb (Talk) 18:17, 11 April 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to Guang Li has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Jclemens (talk) 02:46, 17 May 2008 (UTC)

June 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to The Scholar Ship has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Metagraph comment 07:28, 12 June 2008 (UTC)

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Abraham Lincoln assassination has been reverted. Your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove unwanted links and spam from Wikipedia. The external link you added or changed is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. The external links I reverted were matching the following regex rule(s): rule: 'youtube\.com' (link(s): http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ApUbW1xU8c0) . If the external link you inserted or changed was to a media file (e.g. an image or a sound or video file) on an external server, then note that linking to such files may be subject to Wikipedia's copyright policy and therefore probably should not be linked to. Please consider using our upload facility to upload a suitable media file. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, or similar site, then please check the information on the external site thorougly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creators copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).

If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:27, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

July 2008

Your edits to May 31

Dear 202.0.106.130,
Some of your edits on the page May 31 have been undone by PseudoBot, a robot built to keep the date pages tidy. The problems are:

The person you added doesn't seem to have a Wikipedia page.

If the page exists, check that you've spelled and capitalized the name the same way as the article, and try again. If it doesn't yet exist, read this page carefully before creating it. In particular, you shouldn't create a page about yourself or anyone you know personally. If this bot has got it wrong (as can unfortunately happen), please accept its author's apologies, and (if you would like) leave a message on this talk page with the details, so it can be improved. PseudoBot (talk) 03:50, 18 July 2008 (UTC)

August 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Jessicah Schipper has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Chicago god (talk) 06:32, 14 August 2008 (UTC)

October 2008

Welcome to Wikipedia. Your test on Paul Wade worked, and has been removed. If you would like to experiment further, please use the sandbox. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you.  – iridescent 00:52, 1 October 2008 (UTC)

October 2012

Please do not add unreferenced or poorly referenced information, especially if controversial, to articles or any other page on Wikipedia about living persons, as you did to Maxime Carlot Korman. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 03:05, 16 October 2012 (UTC)

January 2013

Your edit is unreferenced. Please provide a valid citation in future. MAShaikh (talk) 06:21, 4 January 2013 (UTC)

April 2013

• Warning. The material you added to Dominic Hannigan violates multiple policies and guidelines at Wikipedia. You have added it twice. If you persist, you risk being blocked.--Bbb23 (talk) 01:36, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. You appear to be engaged in an edit war with one or more editors according to your reverts at Dominic Hannigan. Although repeatedly reverting or undoing another editor's contributions may seem necessary to protect your preferred version of a page, on Wikipedia this is usually seen as obstructing the normal editing process, and often creates animosity between editors. Instead of edit warring, please try to reach a consensus on the talk page.

If editors continue to revert to their preferred version they are likely to be blocked from editing. This isn't done to punish an editor, but to prevent the disruption caused by edit warring. In particular, editors should be aware of the three-revert rule, which says that an editor must not perform more than three reverts on a single page within a 24-hour period. While edit warring on Wikipedia is not acceptable in any amount, breaking the three-revert rule is very likely to lead to a block. Thank you. Winkelvi (talk) 01:39, 22 April 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

June 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to List of Old Sydneians may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry, just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• | style="text-align:center;"| <ref>[http://www.dailytelegraph.com.au/why-our-proud-mp-alex-greenwich-is-first-among-equals/story-

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 07:20, 26 June 2013 (UTC)

October 2013

Hello, I'm Mark Arsten. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Russell Crowe, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Mark Arsten (talk) 01:59, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lleyton Hewitt with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. ///EuroCarGT 02:12, 2 October 2013 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Newington College, you may be blocked from editing. --LemonTwinkle 06:17, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

May 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to New South Wales Premier's Literary Awards may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

• |[[Text Press||

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:10, 22 May 2014 (UTC)

October 2014

Hello, I'm XLinkBot. I wanted to let you know that I removed one or more external links you added to the page Cerebus the Aardvark, because they seemed to be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page, or take a look at our guidelines about links.  
Your edit here to Cerebus the Aardvark was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links which are discouraged per our external links guideline. The external link(s) you added or changed (http://momentofcerebus.blogspot.com) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. If the external link you inserted or changed was to a blog, forum, free web hosting service, fansite, or similar site (see 'Links to avoid', #11), then please check the information on the external site thoroughly. Note that such sites should probably not be linked to if they contain information that is in violation of the creator's copyright (see Linking to copyrighted works), or they are not written by a recognised, reliable source. Linking to sites that you are involved with is also strongly discouraged (see conflict of interest).
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:17, 29 October 2014 (UTC)
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

---