You are obviously a sockpuppet ofanonymous user 60.53.132.106 edit

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing Sockpuppet Anonymous user anonymous user 60.53.132.106 is back with a new ID as 175.145.180.172

Anonymous user blocked anonymous user 60.53.132.106 is back with a new ID as an unsigned anonymous user as 175.145.180.172 it was blocked for more than one week. Keep an eye on him /her please SaNaNtha Hegde (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet Anonymous user anonymous user 60.53.132.106 is back with a new ID as 175.145.180.172 edit

Anonymous user blocked anonymous user 60.53.132.106 is back with a new ID as an unsigned anonymous user as 175.145.180.172 it was blocked for more than one week. Keep an eye on him /her please SaNaNtha Hegde (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Please do have a look and recheck at what he/she is pointing and revertingSaNaNtha Hegde (talk) 17:09, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

Sockpuppet Anonymous user anonymous user 60.53.132.106 is back with a new ID as 175.145.180.172 edit

Anonymous user blocked anonymous user 60.53.132.106 is back with a new ID as an unsigned anonymous user as 175.145.180.172 it was blocked for more than one week. Keep an eye on him /her please SaNaNtha Hegde (talk) 17:06, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

  • Please do have a look and recheck at what he/she is pointing SaNaNtha Hegde (talk) 18:36, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

February 2022 edit

  This is your only warning; if you vandalize Wikipedia again, as you did at User talk:Ab207, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. CutlassCiera 18:45, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:175.145.180.172. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Alexf(talk) 19:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
 
Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for persistently making disruptive edits.
If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Jauerbackdude?/dude. 19:15, 22 February 2022 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

{{unblock|I have no idea why blocked me here. User talk:SaNaNtha Hegde are the main who making disruptive editing here. I came here to report the user who has done the majority of changes, reverting content, awards, added fake references in Wikipedia. The user is a sockpuppet of [[1]] who is consistently being disruptive right now with a New user ID. Please kindly investigate about this user's fist. There is absolutely no mistake from my side}}