Welcome! edit

Hello! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay. You are welcome to edit anonymously; however, creating an account is free and has several benefits (for example, the ability to create pages, upload media and edit without one's IP address being visible to the public).

Create an account

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

Happy editing! Matt Deres (talk) 23:49, 17 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

November 2020 edit

  Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Neebing—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 20:09, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. P,TO 19104 (talk) (contribs) 20:12, 19 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add unsourced or poorly sourced content, as you did at James, Ontario, you may be blocked from editing. Magnolia677 (talk) 18:56, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
See Talk:James,_Ontario 162.208.168.92 (talk) 19:08, 25 November 2020 (UTC)Reply

December 2020 edit

  Hello. Some of your recent genre changes, such as the one you made to List of Canadian flags, have conflicted with our neutral point of view and/or verifiability policies. While we invite all users to contribute constructively to Wikipedia, we urge all editors to provide reliable sources for edits made. When others disagree, we recommend you seek consensus for certain edits by discussing the matter on the article's talk page. Thank you. Slykos (talkcontribsrights) 18:32, 3 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, your addition of one or more external links to the page Coach Canada has been reverted.
Your edit here to Coach Canada was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove links in references which are discouraged per our reliable sources guideline. The reference(s) you added or changed (http://www.angelfire.com/ca/TORONTO/trentwaywagar.html) is/are on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia.
If you were trying to insert an external link that does comply with our policies and guidelines, then please accept my creator's apologies and feel free to undo the bot's revert. However, if the link does not comply with our policies and guidelines, but your edit included other, constructive, changes to the article, feel free to make those changes again without re-adding the link. Please read Wikipedia's external links guideline for more information, and consult my list of frequently-reverted sites. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! --XLinkBot (talk) 01:11, 7 December 2020 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, please ignore this notice.

Merging of articles in Whitemouth RM edit

Hello,

I am just following up on the merging of articles into the Rural Municipality of Whitemouth. Generally when dealing with RM articles, the format is to provide a short list of communities in the RM and any specific RM history to that page. Large and specific history sections of each community, such as the Elma article, should generally remain on the specific community's page. It appears that this RM page is out of format. Krazytea(talk) 02:06, 17 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

January 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm Roller26. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to North Glenora, Edmonton—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Roller26 (talk) 21:00, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Inglewood, Edmonton. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Roller26 (talk) 21:04, 31 December 2020 (UTC)Reply

  Hello. In a recent edit, you changed one or more words or styles from one national variety of English to another. Because Wikipedia has readers from all over the world, our policy is to respect national varieties of English in Wikipedia articles.

For a subject exclusively related to the United Kingdom (for example, a famous British person), use British English. For something related to the United States in the same way, use American English. For something related to another English-speaking country, such as Canada, Australia, New Zealand, Ireland, India, or Pakistan use the variety of English used there. For an international topic, use the form of English that the original author of the article used.

In view of that, please don't change articles from one version of English to another, even if you don't normally use the version in which the article is written. Respect other people's versions of English. They, in turn, should respect yours. Other general guidelines on how Wikipedia articles are written can be found in the Manual of Style. If you have any questions about this, you can ask me on my talk page or visit the help desk. Caius G. (talk) 20:46, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Hi, Caddie is used in both British and American English, with Caddy being an alternate, somewhat archaic spelling. Note the caddie spelling at PGAtour.com and TheOpen.com. 162.208.168.92 (talk) 21:03, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
Hi, youre right - it doesn't seem to be a regional thing. Nonetheless, both spellings work for Wikipedia, so whether or not you want to spend your time on a relatively trivial (granted, I'm not an avid golfer) matter is down to you. Happy gnoming! Best, Caius G. (talk) 21:15, 19 January 2021 (UTC)Reply
If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not use styles that are nonstandard, unusual, inappropriate or difficult to understand in articles. There is a Manual of Style, and edits should not deliberately go against it without special reason. Thank you. jp×g 04:17, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Following up on El Dorado Rum edit

Hi, I'm not sure if pings work on IPs so I'm hoping this message works. I've added a few citations to the article El Dorado Rum, and I was wondering if you had any feedback. I'm ambivalent with regards to deletion, but my gut tells me it will result in a keep + a lot of AfD drama. Maybe you have some good ideas for culling/cleaning up the article? Cheers, Estheim (talk) 14:36, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

Thanks for that! I often forget to check what-links-here. I added 2, but in context of the company, which sort of reinforces the name change I proposed. I think major rum manufacturers are relevant to the sugar industry section of Agriculture in Guyana and Guyana Sugar Corporation, but both articles are in shoddy state. Fixing the sugar industry section had been on my to-do list for some time already, ay yai yai. Anyway, good tip! Cheers, Estheim (talk) 21:58, 20 January 2021 (UTC)Reply

February 2021 edit

  Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you copied or moved text from one or more pages into another page. While you are welcome to re-use Wikipedia's content, here or elsewhere, Wikipedia's licensing does require that you provide attribution to the original contributor(s). When copying within Wikipedia, this is supplied at minimum in an edit summary at the page into which you've copied content, disclosing the copying and linking to the copied page, e.g., copied content from [[page name]]; see that page's history for attribution. It is good practice, especially if copying is extensive, to also place a properly formatted {{copied}} template on the talk pages of the source and destination. Please provide attribution for this duplication if it has not already been supplied by another editor, and if you have copied material between pages before, even if it was a long time ago, you should provide attribution for that also. You can read more about the procedure and the reasons at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. If you are the sole author of the prose that was moved, attribution is not required.Diannaa (talk) 12:22, 9 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

A barnstar for you! edit

  The Original Barnstar
Thanks for the reference on [Ottawa station] and for helping making travel to Ottawa a little bit smoother. I looked before, but I couldn't find the link. 👍 Cheers Ottawajin (talk) 10:21, 19 February 2021 (UTC)Reply

March 2021 edit

  Hello, I'm TravelAroundOz. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wyndham Hotels & Resorts have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. TravelAroundOz (talk) 01:58, 13 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Mamadi Camara edit

Hi, I tried to ping you on Talk:Mamadi_Camará#Requested_move_26_March_2021, but I don't think it worked. Wanted to let you know since you voted, I proposed a re-vote there due to the multiple options proposed. RedPatchBoy (talk) 03:26, 27 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Human Tornado. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Hello, I'm CommanderWaterford. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Kevin Owens—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

  You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Joey Ryan (wrestler). CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:22, 31 March 2021 (UTC)Reply

April 2021 edit

Thank you for your insightful comments at Talk:Fortune Brands Home & Security. — BarrelProof (talk) 16:33, 2 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

  Welcome to Wikipedia. Wikipedia invites everyone to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, but one or more redirects you created, such as with The Kangaroos, have been considered disruptive and/or malicious, and have been reverted. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to the encyclopedia. . --mAyLiNgOeEd (Talk to me!🗣) (What else I did!📜) 22:25, 5 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. Thanks! Noah 💬 21:16, 13 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello. Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia.

When editing Wikipedia, there is a field labeled "Edit summary" below the main edit box. It looks like this:

Edit summary (Briefly describe your changes)

I noticed your recent edit to Capital Scotland does not have an edit summary. Please be sure to provide a summary of every edit you make, even if you write only the briefest of summaries. The summaries are very helpful to people browsing an article's history.

Edit summary content is visible in:

Please use the edit summary to explain your reasoning for the edit, or a summary of what the edit changes. With a Wikipedia account you can give yourself a reminder to add an edit summary by setting Preferences → Editing →   Prompt me when entering a blank edit summary. Thanks! Cupcake547Let's chat! 15:39, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Hello and welcome to Wikipedia. Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. The summaries are helpful to people browsing an article's history, so it is important that you use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did. Feel free to use the sandbox to make test edits. Thank you. Cupcake547Let's chat! 16:11, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Just puting m in the edit summary box confuses editors about what you are doing.

  • I am anon, I don't have the little tick box for the m. Sorry. Just fixing bad links 162.208.168.92 (talk) 16:14, 14 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Requested move 6 April 2021 edit

Hi! I've moved The Place: you're welcome to turn the redirect into a disambiguation page. – Uanfala (talk) 16:28, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Celeron Island edit

If you want to just delete the whole RM and put it back at WP:RM/TR, I have no objection to my comment being deleted. Station1 (talk) 22:14, 8 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

Global (company) edit

Nice work fixing those links. Did you use some kind of automated tool? — BarrelProof (talk) 02:01, 15 April 2021 (UTC)Reply

December 2021 edit

  Thank you for experimenting with Wikipedia. Your image was inserted successfully on the page Crestwood, Edmonton, but because it appeared to be irrelevant to the article or violated the image use policy, it has been reverted or removed. Please use the sandbox for any tests you want to do. Take a look at the welcome page if you would like to learn more about contributing to our encyclopedia. The image file "Lighted Lollipops (6614701799).jpg" which you added is not from that location. If you check the image's geographic coordinates, you will see that it was taken in Saskatoon, Saskatchewan. I have removed it from the Crestwood article accordingly. Drm310 🍁 (talk) 14:39, 15 December 2021 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

March 2022 edit

  Hello, I'm Quid Est Squid. I noticed that you recently removed content from PMA without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an accurate edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the removed content has been restored. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Quid Est Squid (talk) 16:22, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to PMA, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Thank you. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:25, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

  Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove portions of page content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia without adequate explanation, as you did at PMA, you may be blocked from editing. ― Blaze WolfTalkBlaze Wolf#6545 16:29, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.
  • Hi, I appreciate the zealousness, but perhaps confirming the validity of edits before repeatedly reverting and threatening bans is a better approach. 162 etc. (talk) 16:44, 7 March 2022 (UTC)Reply

March 2024 edit

  Hello, I'm Flibirigit. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Memorial Cup, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Flibirigit (talk) 18:02, 4 March 2024 (UTC)Reply