151.40.45.125

Re: Not a good job

What's wrong with the sources I added, or with those for India (other than the "powerhouse" one which was recently removed)? I don't think India's liable to become a superpower, either, but many academics do, so Wikipedia covers them. Oh, and I'm American, not Russian, although a lot of my family is from the former Czechoslovakia. Tezero (talk) 21:00, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

151.40.45.125 and Tezero, I was reviewing your edits on the Potential Superpowers but really the problem lies with Antiochus the Great[1] and on the Potential Superpowers here[2] and OccultZone is involved but also Antiochus the Great has been known to hide behind multiple ips even though he says he doesn't. The problem started with Russia as a superpower to not a superpower on December 30, 2013 with Antiochus the Great and he did it on the potential superpowers May 2014. These two editors are behind this anti Russia campaign, they hate Russia and so they are put it's academic sources off and discussions off the map. They are pro USA all the way even though Antiochus the Great is British. I have their history of communication with each since April 2013 so I know their track record to verify their anti Russia.

The fact is Russia is a superpower, period. The academic source is Russia in the 21st Century: The Prodigal Superpower Steven Rosefielde, International Relations Professor UC University, 2004 http://www.amazon.com/Russia-21st-Century-Prodigal-Superpower/dp/0521545293

but for Antiochus the Great and OccultZone to say its out of date, oh really but that is absurd but then when it comes to their source on the Superpowers page on the academic source "Lonely Superpower or Unapologetic Hyperpower? Analyzing American Power in the post–Cold War Era", it is outdated, way outdated. You can not have a 1999 source to say the United States is a superpower. If the US is a superpower then it needs current acedemic sources to state it is a superpower. The url is http://post.queensu.ca/~nossalk/papers/hyperpower.htm but for Antiochus the Great and OccultZone they don't want to reply if there is no new update, the only other one is a 2008 source they have, that's it.

I also have over 100 or so Russia superpower articles from 2003 to 2014, so I am not just saying that but I have those sources at hand when I will use them but I have a hard time dealing those the corrupted editors on these pages who are specifically out to denounce Russia.

Also, I am not Russian myself. I was born in Maine, I am full American as their is nothing Russian about me, so my tale is I support the facts not the anti countries some editors are using Wikipedia for. There needs to be some editor elimination on these

Anyway I wanted to forward that info to you guys, thanks--192.173.144.237 (talk) 23:05, 7 July 2014 (UTC)

A request

Hi there. I'm Serge, an Admin here at Wikipedia. You...seem to be making a lot of "melodramatic" comments on talk pages. Can you please tone it down with some of the "propaganda" and "historians are laughing at this" type commentary? Its good to keep discussing things, but comments like this aren't constructive, they just irritate people, rather than working to find a real solution. Thanks. Sergecross73 msg me 02:50, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

Disruptive edits on Potential Superpowers for ip hoping

While I would like to make a comment about Russia being a superpower, I found ip user 151.40.13.125 for disruptive ip hoping on these discussions, speaking against Russia in all ip’s I found below. All the same editor, all ip addresses are from Florence Italy. I would like to discredit this user out of this discussion since it is all the same wording slamming disruptive edits against Russia since 2013 that this is not effective when users like this are disruptive and are doing the opposite. Here is the list with links of the contributes starting July 8, 2014‎ - 151.40.13.161[3] , July 7, 2014 151.40.45.125[4], March 17, 2014 - 151.40.95.82[5], April 2013 - Bocca Trabaria[6], March 2014 - 151.40.24.9 http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/151.40.24.9], March 2014 -151.40.7.192[7], Sept 23, 2013 - 151.40.18.30[8], Sept 15, 2013 - 151.40.55.125[9], March 18, 2014 - 151.40.35.236[10], March 18, 2014 - 151.40.9.149[11], March 17, 2014 - 151.40.72.141[12], March 16, 2014 - 151.40.14.179[13], March 16, 2014 - 151.40.83.17[14], March 15, 2014 - 151.40.69.199[15], March 15, 2014 - 151.40.34.218[16], March 15, 2014 - 151.40.120.19[17], Feb 4, 2014 - 151.40.63.30[18], Feb 4, 2014- 151.40.16.167[19], Dec 28, 2013 - 151.40.107.93[20], Dec 27, 2013 - 151.40.27.25[21], Dec 27, 2013 - 151.40.64.77[22], Dec 25, 2013 - 151.40.54.32[23], Dec 23, 2013 - 151.40.41.170[24], Dec 22, 2013 - 151.40.9.139[25], Sept 8, 2013 - 151.40.102.200[26], August 14, 2013 - 151.40.125.50[27], May 10, 2013 – Mediolanum[28], Oct 22, 2013 - Glc72[29], May 21, 2013 - 151.40.11.180[30], May 14, 2013 -151.40.59.151[31], May 14, 2013 - 151.40.60.108[32], May 11, 2013 - Bocca_Trabaria[33]

That is the list which this ip user 151.40.13.125 is certainly not a good editor because of past disruption on this very subject.--173.224.116.150 (talk) 08:49, 8 July 2014 (UTC)

---