144.132.28.156

August 2012

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one of your recent edits has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

• ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
• For help, take a look at the introduction.
• The following is the log entry regarding this message: History of Australian rules football was changed by 144.132.28.156 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.857469 on 2012-08-09T10:18:28+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 10:18, 9 August 2012 (UTC)

Breach of WP:3RR at Sport in Australia

Both you and Afgtnk are now guilty of edit warring and a formal breach of the three revert rule. This is highly liable to lead to you being blocked from editing. Please step back and let others sort out that content. HiLo48 (talk) 06:34, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Rugby League

Rugby League is now the mainstream sport in Northern WA. Northern Territory is divided.

State of Origin has between 300 to 400 thousand viewers for each game in VIC, plus crowds of 50 thousand +. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Afgtnk (talk • contribs) 06:46, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Sport in Australia

Please join us on the Talk page and discuss things, rather than making changes that could just upset others (rightly or not). You are edit warring. It's not acceptable. HiLo48 (talk) 07:06, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

And please don't make stuff up. The highest attended sport in the Country is Horse Racing and the first to second gap is quite large. It's referenced in the article to Federal Bereau of Statistics data, or at least it used to be. It's not even remotely questionable. So please, be a lot more careful with your edits and use references (I'll refer yo to WP:Referencing for beginners) to ANY questionable claims. --Falcadore (talk) 07:36, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Seconded (thirded?). Some more input on the article's talk page would be much better than WP:EDITWARring. Ignorant Armies (talk) 13:42, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Notice of Edit warring noticeboard discussion

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. The thread is User:Afgtnk and User:144.132.28.156 reported by Bidgee (talk) (Result: ). Thank you. —Bidgee (talk) 10:18, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 12:44, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

September 2012

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 24 hours for your disruption caused by edit warring and violation of the three-revert rule at Sport in Australia. During a dispute, you should first try to discuss controversial changes and seek consensus. If that proves unsuccessful you are encouraged to seek dispute resolution, and in some cases it may be appropriate to request page protection. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}} below this notice, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bbb23 (talk) 14:17, 15 September 2012 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you didn't make the edit, consider creating an account for yourself so you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Sources

Thank you for your contributions to Sport in Australia. Before adding information, please verify the source supports the statement you are adding. If it does not, please identify and include a source that supports your text addition. --LauraHale (talk) 12:57, 3 October 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dek0001 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 11:53, 4 October 2012 (UTC)

Wikipedia:Wikiquette assistance has closed

The Wikiquette assistance notice board has been closed by community consensus as not being an effective tool to resolve issues. Please read the notice on the page for other options . -- The Red Pen of Doom 12:04, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Yes, specifically WP:DRN as this appears to be a content dispute dangerouspanda 12:13, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

Commonwealth Games

Before you remove the sentence again, please go to the talk page and explain why the following sources are not to be trusted:

• Australian Commonwealth Games Association (June 2001). "2002 GAMES - An English garden party or a case of "The Empire Strikes Back?"". Australian Commonwealth Games Association Newsletter. 2 (5 ed.). National Library of Australia. Retrieved 6 October 2012.
• Nauright, John; Parrish, Charles (2012). Sports Around the World: History, Culture, and Practice. ABC-CLIO. ISBN 978-1-59884-300-2.
• * Shilbury, David; Deane, John (2001). Sport management in Australia : an organisational overview (Second ed.). Bentleigh East, Victoria: Strategic Sport Management. ISBN 9780958017008. OCLC 777321324.

If you believe these sources are not reliable, beyond commenting on the talk page, you may also wish to comment on Wikipedia:RSN and explain your concerns and ask if others view these as reliable sources of information for this article. --LauraHale (talk) 12:40, 6 October 2012 (UTC)

October 2012

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of one month for abuse of editing privileges. If you have a registered Wikipedia username, you may log in and continue to edit. Otherwise, once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. De728631 (talk) 15:39, 8 October 2012 (UTC)

Sockpuppetry case

Your name has been mentioned in connection with a sockpuppetry case. Please refer to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Dek0001 for evidence. Please make sure you make yourself familiar with the guide to responding to cases before editing the evidence page. Bidgee (talk) 12:29, 11 November 2012 (UTC)

---