103.131.193.6

June 2020

Hello, I'm Jerodlycett. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Seville Fair have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse. Thanks. Jerod Lycett (talk) 04:38, 19 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Lomo saltado. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. CLCStudent (talk) 20:23, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Lomo saltado, you may be blocked from editing. CLCStudent (talk) 20:36, 21 June 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

I would argue your changes show considerable bias on the subject of Christopher Columbus "brutal is a very emotive word" and it can be argued Columbus was not responsible for the extinction of the Taino or slavery. sources. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/2017/10/09/christopher-columbus-xx-my-ancestor-wasnt-evil-column/744333001/ https://www.orlandosentinel.com/news/os-xpm-1997-10-12-9710102635-story.html#:~:text=Christopher%20Columbus%20was%20a%20great,means%20detract%20from%20his%20achievement. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Lodgealot (talk • contribs) 02:22, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy by inserting commentary or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Pachamanca. SuperGoose007 ^(Honk!) 03:32, 22 June 2020 (UTC)

July 2020

Hello, I'm Flyer22 Frozen. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to Commonwealth Trans-Antarctic Expedition—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Flyer22 Frozen (talk) 03:02, 22 July 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making test edits in Wikipedia pages, such as those you made to Commonwealth Trans-Antarctic Expedition, even if you intend to fix them later. Your edits have been reverted. If you would like to experiment again, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Muffin of the English (talk) 02:07, 23 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Hello, I'm OcarinaOfTime. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to List of environmental disasters—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. OcarinaOfTime (talk) 20:45, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at List of environmental disasters, you may be blocked from editing. CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:47, 27 July 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you blank out or remove content from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thadou. Porterjoh (talk) 21:40, 28 July 2020 (UTC)

August 2020

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Corn syrup. — Chevvin 02:48, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Drmies (talk) 02:52, 4 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

Anonymous users from this IP address have been blocked from editing for a period of 72 hours to prevent further vandalism.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  only (talk) 02:02, 6 August 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address and you are an uninvolved editor with a registered account, you may continue to edit by logging in.

September 2020

Hello, I'm RA0808. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —specifically this edit to April Fools' Day—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. RA0808 ^talk_contribs 21:42, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism may result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. Vizzinifezzikwomanchuck (talk) 21:53, 14 September 2020 (UTC)

If this is a shared IP address, and you did not make the edits referred to above, consider creating an account for yourself or logging in with an existing account so that you can avoid further irrelevant notices.

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to blank out or remove content, templates, or other materials from Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to List of top Olympic gold medalists in swimming, you may be blocked from editing. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 23:07, 15 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 1 week to prevent further vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  Alexf^(talk) 21:35, 16 September 2020 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 3 months for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 23:15, 23 September 2020 (UTC)

February 2021

Hello, I'm Steve M. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to South China tiger—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Steve M (talk) 19:57, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to Thoth. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Repeated vandalism can result in the loss of editing privileges. Thank you. NASCARfan0548 ↗ 20:00, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

To edit, please create an account at home and log in with it here.

Last edited:
Last edited by:

22:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)
Materialscientist (talk · contribs)

---

Due to persistent vandalism, anonymous editing from your school, library, or educational institution's IP address may be blocked (disabled). You will continue to have access to read the encyclopedia. If you are logged in but still unable to edit, please follow these instructions. To prevent abuse, account creation via this IP address might also be disabled.

If account creation is disabled and you are unable to create an account elsewhere, you can request one by following the instructions at Wikipedia:Request an account. Please check on this list that the username you choose has not already been taken. If editing is required for class projects, please have your instructor or network administrator contact us (with reference to this IP address) at the Unblock Ticket Request System with a contact email address that is listed on your school's website. Thank you for your cooperation.

Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 21:54, 11 February 2021 (UTC)

December 2023

Hello, I'm Materialscientist. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to How the Grinch Stole Christmas (2000 film)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. Thanks. Materialscientist (talk) 22:47, 3 December 2023 (UTC)

---