北京555

Welcome!

Hi, 北京555, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• Introduction to Wikipedia
• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• How to edit a page and How to develop articles
• How to create your first article
• Simplified Manual of Style
• Need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Visit the Task Center.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{help me}} before the question.

However, there is a small issue with your username. As it is not in Latin script, it may be illegible to most other contributors to the English Wikipedia. Although usernames like yours are not prohibited, Wikipedia's signature guideline and username policy encourage you, as a courtesy to other users, to alter your signature so that it also includes a transliteration of your username using Latin characters, so others can see it correctly. For the how-to of tailoring your username, please see WP:CUSTOMSIG.

Thanks, and feel free to message me about anything. PoisonHK _{Sapiens dominabitur astris} 15:52, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you 北京555 (talk) 15:54, 14 March 2024 (UTC)

March 2024

Hello, I'm Bbb23. I wanted to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring have been undone because they did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use your sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Teahouse or the Help desk. You must follow the instructions at the top of WP:ANEW to file a report. Bbb23 (talk) 23:12, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at List of countries by GDP (nominal). Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.

• If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
• If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. Thank you. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 23:37, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

Sorry, but it wasn’t a disturbing edit, I expect you to move to the previous edit! Now you've created a big mess in the table, this particular editor has found out about it and he edits obsessively and in a way that violates the Wikipedia rules! I will expect you to reverse the edit. 北京555 (talk) 23:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

You totally didn’t even notice that this editor is edit only one article and violating the Wikipedia rules!!!!! 北京555 (talk) 23:49, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

@Cremastra 北京555 (talk) 23:47, 16 March 2024 (UTC)

You're both edit-warring, you both need to calm down. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 00:03, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I've restored the article to how it appeared before you two started your dispute. 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 00:04, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

But let me explain to you, I did not make an edit that is controversial or problematic, overall I arranged the table in an orderly manner and now the table is totally massed up, I would appreciate it if you revert to the previous version so that at least the table is in order. I didn't do any problematic editing. And you can check and confirm it. 北京555 (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@Cremastra 北京555 (talk) 00:08, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

this editor is editing only one article again and again . Please check and see that my edit is totally fine but now the table is a total mess 北京555 (talk) 00:10, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@CremastraI will open a discussion , but I would appreciate it if you revert to my latest version, you can check and see that it was a good faith edit, and apart from this particular editor, no one objected to it. I would appreciate it if you revert to my latest version, which you called "dispurtive" but for no real reason (I would be happy to check and see that the editing itself was good and useful ) 北京555 (talk) 00:56, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

My repeated undo of your edits to the article is problematic, but so is your repeated re-editing of the article before reaching agreement on the discussion page.

The only thing I think we should be discussing is that you should not be able to make your edits so that Taiwan, Kosovo, Palestine, etc., which used to be ranked in the table, are no longer ranked.

I think and insist that we should "keep" the previous version that cremastra has reverted to.

To avoid an editing war, I will no longer do undo. In any case, I think we should continue to keep the previous version of the article with the correct which those three countries are ranked. Minchuchui (talk) 02:21, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

I would appreciate it if you would apologize for your problematic behavior, I explained to you the reasons for the good faith editing I did

Do not edit these articels ​​again.

I also would like apologise. 北京555 (talk) 02:36, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

北京555, you are not in a position to ask a user to "not edit" the articles again. Minchuchui, 北京555 is blocked from editing all pages including discussion pages at the moment. This can change, but it's the current situation. User talk pages are not a suitable replacement for the articles' talk pages, and discussions about article content should happen on the articles' talk pages. It is highly unlikely that you'll be able to convince 北京555, so you'll need to request a third opinion, start an RfC or generally have a look at the options provided by the dispute resolution policy. You'll need opinions from experienced uninvolved users to resolve this dispute, and you can't do so here on this page. ~ ToBeFree (talk) 03:06, 17 March 2024 (UTC)

@ToBeFree can I start dissection on talk page? Right now it’s doesn’t let me but it was written that I can start discussion on talk page . 北京555 (talk) 04:15, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

@ToBeFree can you please check it out? I don’t see a reason why I can’t have a discussion on talk page(also not mentioned in the block page). 北京555 (talk) 09:00, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

 Done ~ ToBeFree (talk) 09:17, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

Thank you 北京555 (talk) 12:11, 28 March 2024 (UTC)

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 2 weeks for disruptive editing including promotion and using Wikipedia as a political battleground. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.  ~ ToBeFree (talk) 01:57, 17 March 2024 (UTC)