Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
The reason behind the block of your bot "タチコマ robot" was that the bot was inactive (did not make any edits) for more than one year. If you are planning to continue to run the bot, you will have to re-apply for an botflag at is:Wikipedia:Vélmenni. If your bot gets accepted then the block will be lifted. It is also worth mentioning that the bot policy on is.wiki has changed since last time.
Your username has been renamed as requested.
--Snaevar (talk) 00:31, 8 December 2011 (UTC) (sysop on is.wiki)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago2 comments1 person in discussion
What were you trying to do here? Adding fact tags without making a specific comment in talk to explain your concern is bad form. Did you intend to remove a source and replace it with a tag? I'll give you the benefit of the doubt this time but please be more careful in future. --John (talk) 20:35, 13 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
The source is a general ref explaining that USAF uses these aircraft. It does in no way explain that USAF was using these aircraft during the actual incident which is the kind of source needed for the infobox. This is why the mentioned ref isn't helpful. Involved parties should be very well sourced particularly on articles that cover international incidents with political consequences. -- A Certain White Catchi? 06:18, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Hmm. It was very easy to find a better source for it being a USAF drone. You also added fact tags to the CIA and Iranian armed forces, although these facts were clearly and multiply referenced throughout the article. We all make mistakes but I would ask you again to be more careful in the future. As it stood, your edit looked almost like vandalism. --John (talk) 08:10, 14 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Information referenced elsewhere in the article isn't very relevant unless there is a direct citation in the infobox on articles such as this one. The infobox did not have ref's. I would prefer sources beyond media to establish participants if possible given the importance of the information. I can always find "media" claiming CIA was involved in regards to practically anything involving Iran which is why I ask of this. Certainly some media is more credible than others but official sources claiming responsibility are even better. -- A Certain White Catchi? 09:53, 14 December 2011 (UTC)
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
This page is a self redirect. Were you trying to redirect it to somewhere else? -- A Certain White Catchi? 03:04, 26 December 2011 (UTC)
I meant to point the redirect to 1992-93 South Pacific cyclone Season and have redirected it off now. Thank you for bringing this redirect to my attention.Jason Rees (talk) 03:38, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I left a message at your bot's talkpage [[1]] at ksh-wikipedia. Please follow the instructions. Otherwise you are not allowed to run your bot at this wikipedia. Regards --BBKurt (talk) 21:01, 26 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
Latest comment: 12 years ago1 comment1 person in discussion
I have granted file mover rights to your account following either a request for those rights or a clear need for the ability to move files. For information on the file mover rights and under what circumstances it is okay to move files, see Wikipedia:File mover. If you do not want file mover rights anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. —Tom Morris (talk) 18:00, 29 December 2011 (UTC)Reply
