Ἀλήθεια

Welcome!

Hello, Ἀλήθεια, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

• The five pillars of Wikipedia
• Tutorial
• How to edit a page
• How to write a great article
• Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! --Flex (talk/contribs) 20:48, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

Archaeological Study Bible

The lack of an infobox let me to consider it a review or similar thereof. Book articles noted on Wikipedia should include an info box such as the one here: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Infobox_Book S orry for the confusion and happy editing. M173627 (talk) 22:24, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

March 2008

Hi, the recent edit you made to NIV Study Bible has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. The Helpful One ^(Review) 20:38, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Oh, sorry, it looked like you were changing the link to gibberish! --The Helpful One ^(Review) 20:49, 4 March 2008 (UTC)

Caravaggio

Three separate issues:

1. It seems that you are systematically emptying the Death of Jesus page. Is that a way to bypass the merge discussion? Else, please add soemthing new to the Deat page before deleting large pieces. You know the topic really well, so I am sure you can write it without problem, if you want to. So please add do some more items before deleting too much.

2. I searched for the Caravaggio and the other two images very carefully so they all fit well on the Death page. The images I added to Crucifixion were carefully selected to be about Crucifixion, not about burial. hence the Caravaggio needs to stay on the Death page anyway. There are other Crucifixion photos that I can add, no that ther eis more text.

3. The Medical aspects part looks better now, but the image does not fit right. I will look for a better image.

Thanks History2007 (talk) 18:43, 5 May 2008 (UTC)

Crucifixion of Jesus

Thank for the heads up, but it looks like you were undoing someone else's edits before me.--Carlaude 14:45, 8 May 2008 (UTC)

Long time no edit

Hi, Long time before you edited. I felt we were missing your biblical knowledge edits on various issues. Anyway, on Crucifixion of Jesus there is some new paragraph since 2-3 days ago that says that the 7 sayings are inconsistent, etc. and has some refs from some books. I would like to add some references that support the 7 sayings to balance it. Do you have a starting point on that? Thanks. History2007 (talk) 19:15, 30 October 2009 (UTC)

List of evangelical Christians

Hi, Ἀλήθεια. Just a friendly reminder that another reversion beyond this edit would be a WP:3RR violation. Be certain to make your next move an appeal for an outside neutral opinion. Thanks. — CactusWriter | ^needles 10:20, 15 December 2009 (UTC)

Hi, Ἀλήθεια. Just a friendly note about your message on my page. You were successful in having the Maas article deleted, but there was a real disagreement in your the attempt in which several confirmed notability. I fail to understand your such vendettas. I intend to keep expressing my judgements, which seem to differ from yours. R/T-รัก-ไทย (talk) 04:59, 17 December 2009 (UTC)

Your edit to Talk:Genesis creation myth

Thank you for your contribution to the discussion. You reminded me that I had posted on this very topic some years ago. Since there was already a thread on the topic that you posted about, I inserted your comments into the relevant section. HokieRNB 03:57, 9 April 2010 (UTC)

Mediation Case

A request for formal mediation of the dispute concerning Genesis Creation Myth has been filed with the Mediation Committee (MedCom). You have been named as a party in this request. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Requests for mediation/Genesis Creation Myth and then indicate in the "Party agreement" section whether you would agree to participate in the mediation or not.

Mediation is a process where a group of editors in disagreement over matters of article content are guided through discussing the issues of the dispute (and towards developing a resolution) by an uninvolved editor experienced with handling disputes (the mediator). The process is voluntary and is designed for parties who disagree in good faith and who share a common desire to resolve their differences. Further information on the MedCom is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee; the policy the Committee will work by whilst handling your dispute is at Wikipedia:Mediation Committee/Policy; further information on Wikipedia's policy on resolving disagreements is at Wikipedia:Resolving disputes.

If you would be willing to participate in the mediation of this dispute but wish for its scope to be adjusted then you may propose on the case talk page amendments or additions to the list of issues to be mediated. Any queries or concerns that you have may be directed to an active mediator of the Committee or by e-mailing the MedCom's private mailing list (click here for details).

Please indicate on the case page your agreement to participate in the mediation within seven days of the request's submission.

Thank you, Weaponbb7 (talk)

Crucifixion

Hi, Ok, I think we have an agreement between us two, but as I said before there are 3241721 other people with keyboards that may soon edit whatever we do. As for Jesus vs Jesus of Nazareth, there is already a link, and personally I think given the title it is clear who Jesus is, the most famous person in history. And the Nazareth qualifier is usually used by critics somehow (like there is also Jesus from Culver City ?), so I usually do not use it. Cheers History2007 (talk) 00:55, 18 April 2010 (UTC)

Protestant section of Template talk:Christian denominations and the "Calvinist denomination"!

Howdy,

I thought you'd like to take a peek at my proposal here: Template_talk:Christian_denominations#Proposal_to_fix_the_.22Protestant.22_section_of_this_template_box

TuckerResearch (talk) 06:59, 5 July 2010 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. When you recently edited Ian Eskelin, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Information Society and My Paper Heart (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:37, 13 April 2012 (UTC)

Johannes Maas and Worldwide Faith Missions

I came upon your involvement in the AfD nomination of an article about a missionary by the name of Johannes Maas (see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Maas (missionary) and Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Johannes Maas (missionary) (2nd nomination) for the discussion). I have nominated Worldwide Faith Missions, another article which was written by the same author as the Johannes Maas article, up for AfD. I have also seen from your contributions to Wikipedia, that you are active on articles concerning Christianity. I am no expert on Christian organisations and have tried finding sources on Google to verify the notability of the subject. After having ploughed through many Google results, I have not been able to find one reliable source to establish Worldwide Faith Missions as a notable NGO. Perhaps you have access to sources on Christian NGO's which relate to this subject but are not available through Google? Apart from the author of the Worldwide Faith Missions article and myself, there has been no response so far on its AfD page. Would you mind having a look at this AfD perhaps? You can find it here: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Worldwide Faith Missions. I have also asked another Wikipedia contributor (see User_talk:Phil_Bridger#Johannes_Maas_and_Worldwide_Faith_Missions) who was active on the Johannes Maas AfD discussion, to contribute to the present AfD. Thank you. - Takeaway (talk) 04:00, 17 June 2012 (UTC)

Notification for deletion

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Feinberg

Paul Feinberg

Our interests overlap significantly, and I fully support your program of article creation. One of the reasons I filled in the list of Presidents of the Evangelical Theological Society (which I haven't quite finished yet - I'll finalise it soon), was to see and to show which articles were yet to be created. Harold Lindsell is a glaring redlink - creating that article should be quite easy. Anyway, getting back to Paul Feinberg, Category:Deaths from congestive heart failure is a subcategory of Category:Deaths from heart failure, which is a subcategory of Category:Deaths from cardiovascular disease. But I agree - it doesn't look appropriate in this instance. I'll remove it. StAnselm (talk) 00:42, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

OK, I started an article on Harold Lindsell. StAnselm (talk) 04:35, 22 September 2012 (UTC)

ATS members

Yes, I think it is an excellent table. I think a few columns could and should go - "last", "next and "distance" - maybe some of the students and faculty columns too. "And "since" - the date of the institution's establishment would actually be much more helpful. (Actually, it doesn't fit on one screen with my usual browser.) Website should probably be the final column. Anyway, really good work. StAnselm (talk) 22:07, 19 September 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 5

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Evangelical Theological Society, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Sanders (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:30, 5 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Paul P. Enns, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Exposition (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:35, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

R.

Fair enough. I've never heard of R. being an abbreviation for "Reverend", but there's nothing in the sources that suggests a name starting with R. StAnselm (talk) 20:37, 18 October 2012 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for October 31

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Baptists, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Spilsbury (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:18, 31 October 2012 (UTC)

A page you started has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Paul R. House, Ἀλήθεια!

Wikipedia editor Thesimsmania just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

Great BLP article with noteable references. Try and add an infobox so you can put DOB and extra information in one concise location. See here for more info  thesimsmania  19:10, 19 February 2013 (UTC)

To reply, leave a comment on Thesimsmania's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

Article notability notification

Hello. This message is to inform you that an article that you wrote, William A. Graham (dean), has been recently tagged with a notability notice. This means that it may not meet Wikipedia's notability guidelines. Please note that articles which do not meet these criteria may be merged, redirected, or deleted. Please consider adding reliable, secondary sources to the article in order to establish the topic's notability. You may find the following links useful when searching for sources: Find sources: "William A. Graham (dean)" – news · books · scholar · JSTOR · free images. Thank you for editing Wikipedia! VoxelBot 18:40, 24 May 2013 (UTC)

Congratulations!

		The Christianity Barnstar
		For creating articles on important figures, such as Vernon Grounds. Good to have you back, too. StAnselm (talk) 21:56, 8 July 2013 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for July 9

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Vernon Grounds, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Gordon College (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:08, 9 July 2013 (UTC)

Don't template the regulars

Ouch! You've used a template to send a message to an experienced editor. Please review Wikipedia:Don't template the regulars or maybe listen to a little advice. Doesn't this feel cold, impersonal, and canned? It's meant in good humor. Best wishes.

— Preceding unsigned comment added by Barney the barney barney (talk • contribs) 08:51, 12 May 2014 (UTC)

WP:DOUBLESTANDARD? ...172.162.6.235 (talk) 07:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Template the regulars

Happy trails... 172.162.6.235 (talk) 07:20, 13 May 2014 (UTC)

Disambiguation link notification for May 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Marten Woudstra, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Christian Reformed Church (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:57, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

You've got mail!

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. Please check your email; you've got mail!
Message added 15:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC). It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

Nikkimaria (talk) 15:27, 17 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK nomination of Marten Woudstra

Hello! Your submission of Marten Woudstra at the Did You Know nominations page has been reviewed, and some issues with it may need to be clarified. Please review the comment(s) underneath your nomination's entry and respond there as soon as possible. Thank you for contributing to Did You Know! Gamaliel (talk) 17:30, 21 May 2014 (UTC)

DYK for Marten Woudstra

Cas Liber (talk · contribs) 00:03, 12 June 2014 (UTC)

Who is this

Is this you Dr. Turley — Preceding unsigned comment added by 68.81.1.10 (talk) 02:44, 16 September 2014 (UTC)

No, it's not. Ἀλήθεια 13:25, 10 October 2014 (UTC)

Talkback

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. You have new messages at Walter Görlitz's talk page.
Message added 14:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Walter Görlitz (talk) 14:10, 21 October 2014 (UTC)

TWL HighBeam check-in

Hello Wikipedia Library Users,

You are receiving this message because the Wikipedia Library has record of you receiving a one-year subscription to HighBeam. This is a brief update to remind you about that access:

• Make sure that you can still log in to your HighBeam account; if you are having trouble feel free to contact me for more information. When your access expires you can reapply at WP:HighBeam.
• Remember, if you find this source useful for your Wikipedia work, make sure to include citations with links on Wikipedia: links to partner resources are one of the few ways we can demonstrate usage and demand for accounts to our partners. The greater the linkage, the greater the likelihood a useful partnership will be renewed. For more information about citing this source, see Wikipedia:HighBeam/Citations
• Write unusual articles using this partner's sources? Did access to this source create new opportunities for you in the Wikipedia community? If you have a unique story to share about your contributions, let us know and we can set up an opportunity for you to write a blog post about your work with one of our partner's resources.

Finally, we would greatly appreciate if you filled out this short survey. The survey helps us not only better serve you with facilitating this particular partnership, but also helps us discover what other partnerships and services the Wikipedia Library can offer.

Thank you. Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) at 16:45, 13 April 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:47, 24 November 2015 (UTC)

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 2 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2021 (UTC)

Ways to improve Frank Neuberg

Hello, Ἀλήθεια,

Thank you for creating Frank Neuberg.

I have tagged the page as having some issues to fix, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

References are needed.

This article needs to satisfy general notability as given in WP:NBIO
More sources are needed. Individual sources must be evaluated separately and independently of each other and meet the four criteria below to determine if a source qualifies towards establishing notability:

1. Contain significant coverage addressing the subject of the article directly and in depth.
2. Be completely independent of the article subject.
3. Meet the standard for being a reliable source.
4. Be a secondary source; primary and tertiary sources do not count towards establishing notability.
   

Kindly do the needful.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, leave a comment here and begin it with {{Re|Whiteguru}}. Remember to sign your reply with ~~~~. For broader editing help, please visit the Teahouse.

Delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

Whiteguru (talk) 09:52, 24 May 2022 (UTC)

Frank Neuberg moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Frank Neuberg, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. (t · c) buidhe 01:14, 25 May 2022 (UTC)

Concern regarding Draft:Frank Neuberg

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Frank Neuberg, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 09:28, 30 October 2022 (UTC)

Your submission at Articles for creation: Frank Neuberg (November 15)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Ingenuity was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

• If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Frank Neuberg and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
• If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
• If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

Hello, Ἀλήθεια! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — Ingenuity (talk • contribs) 18:58, 15 November 2022 (UTC)

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:43, 29 November 2022 (UTC)

Proposed deletion of Bruce A. Ware

The article Bruce A. Ware has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No indication the person is significant since lacks description of why or any references supporting significance (a one year stint as president of a minor theological society doesn't seem to count).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Erp (talk) 17:07, 4 March 2023 (UTC)

Your draft article, Draft:Frank Neuberg

Hello, Ἀλήθεια. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Frank Neuberg".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:29, 15 May 2023 (UTC)

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 28 November 2023 (UTC)