 Article display preview: | This is a draft of a potential Signpost article, and should not be interpreted as a finished piece. Its content is subject to review by the editorial team and ultimately by JPxG, the editor in chief. Please do not link to this draft as it is unfinished and the URL will change upon publication. If you would like to contribute and are familiar with the requirements of a Signpost article, feel free to be bold in making improvements!
|
YOUR ARTICLE'S DESCRIPTIVE TITLE HERE
In early April of this year, a few of us in the WikiCup thread of the Wikimedia Discord were discussing the problem of systemic bias on Wikipedia regarding postcolonial, underdeveloped, and/or non-Anglophone countries. This is a fairly common topic of complaint among both Wikipedians and non-Wikipedians, and for good reason; it's still a major weak spot for the English Wikipedia community. It was actually Epicgenius, one of the judges of this year's WikiCup, who initially suggested a contest focusing on developing countries on April 5th. Over the next few days, we brainstormed different ways to run this hypothetical contest: the name, the inclusion criteria, and scoring. Quite a few people chimed in, and Ixtal and I decided to BOLDly set up a project page, aiming for July–September to run the contest. Soon thereafter, we decided to recruit a third coordinator, TechnoSquirrel69; that ended up being a very good decision.
Initially we were thinking about calling it the "Global South WikiContest", but we soon realized that "global south" is too nebulous and subjective of a grouping, so we settled on the IMF's list of developing countries as a basis. We also decided to give bonus points for "least-developed" countries and for "higher-level" articles about broad topics relating to these developing countries, as both of those factors tend to be more challenging to write about. We also came up with some fun awards for our winners.
While planning this back in April, we weren't expecting more than maybe twenty participants. Interest picked up in the Discord as July approached, and we refined the details on the contest's talk page. When we actually opened up for signups and TechnoSquirrel69 set up a watchlist notice, we ended up with around eighty participants, far above what we were prepared for. This actually ended up being fine as many of those who signed up didn't submit anything, but it was very exciting to us coordinators, as it indicated a desire to work on systemic bias.
The course of the contest was largely hiccup-free, and we didn't have to decline very many submissions. We weren't able to get a bot up and working in time either, so we manually updated the leaderboard as submissions came in. As I alluded to above, I was very happy that we had brought on TechnoSquirrel as a third coordinator, because I moved across the Atlantic Ocean at the end of August and was, obviously, unable to properly keep up with submissions and discussion for a time.
I'm very happy we did this experimental contest. We ended up with three new featured articles, ten new featured lists, 88 new good articles, and a truckload of article reviews and DYK nominations, all relating to parts of the world underserved by our encyclopedia—that's nothing to turn one's nose up at! I'd like to express my appreciation for my fellow coordinators, and Chaotic Enby for making our special "Belt-buckles", which we came up with because of the Mercator projection's resemblance to one.
GreenLipstickLesbian's write-up
editAs promised, separate post with some super-basic stats! There's some overcount for sure (I am merely human, and didn't put in any effort to split dual-GA nominations and dual-DYK nominations), but here's some basic estimates for everybody to enjoy! (In terms of creations. Sorry, reviewers, the overcount would have gotten too bad if I'd included your activities!)
Overall, members of the drive managed to create or substantially improve content concerning a grand total of 86 different countries. 86! That's pretty impressive - and, coincidentally, the telephone country code for China. A pretty amazing coincidence, considering which country's coverage members of the drive improved the most.
The top five most-improved countries were:
China, with 1 featured list, 6 GAs, and 13 DYK appearances
India, with 1 featured list, 15 GAs, and 1 ITN appearance
Philippines, with 5 GAs and 7 DYK appearances
North Korea, with 2 GAs and 9 DYK appearances
Kiribati , with 10 GAs and 4 DYK appearances
and then, more individually:
By terms of GAs submitted:
- India with 15
- Tied: China, Kiribati, and
Haiti with 6 - Philippines with 5
By terms of DYKs submitted:
- China with 13
- North Korea with 9
- Philippines with 7
But just because we improved those countries so much, doesn't mean we forgot about the rest. Members of the drive found time to get either a single GA, FA, or DYK for 49 individual countries. Most impressive of those were the two countries that got "only" a featured article: 
Iraq and 
Greenland, brought to you by @AirshipJungleman29 and @Generalissima. If you haven't already, you should take the time to read both of their articles. They're some of the best that Wikipedia has to offer.
Members of the drive also managed to get 3 important deaths (those of presenter 
Aparna, wrestler 
Afa Anoaʻi, and former PM of 
Lebanon Salim Al-Huss) featured In The News. These appearances were brought to us by two editors in particular: @Vacant0and @Jaguarnik. Everybody else, this is who you have to beat next year!
We also got plenty of lists - 10 in total, covering 8 different countries! (Three of these lists covered 
Ukraine) To the uninitiated such as myself, the featured list process may appear somewhat strange, but not to editors such as @MPGuy2824, with their impressive 3 FLS and 7 FLRs, @Vanderwaalforces, who wrote Wikipedia's first ever 
Nigeria-related FL, @Dantheanimator with the 3 Ukraine-related FLs, and @48JCL with their fascinating 
List of World Heritage Sites in Botswana.
Let's look at a breakdown by continent:
The continent we worked on the most was easily Africa, with 36 countries represented. Second place was Asia with 19, followed by the Americas with 15. Oceania got 10, and Europe came in last with 7 countries represented. I bet no other Wiki-drive's ever had that result before!
In terms of content, a special shout-out has to go to @Vigilantcosmicpenguin for their series about Abortion in various African countries- not only did they bring Abortion in Africa through the DYK process, but they brought 11 different country-specific articles through as well. Not content at that, however, they also had to pause and turn 
Abortion in Sierra Leone into a Good Article too! In terms of eliminating systemic bias, the importance of their contributions cannot be overstated.
And while we're talking about Olympic feats, let's pause and appreciate the efforts of @Arconning. They made 1 Olympic related Featured List, 7 Olympic related good articles, and then went above and beyond to get 3 of those articles through the DYK process as well. Talk about gold medalists!
But speaking of sports, @BeanieFan11saw the need to improve the articles on athletes from developing nations, and they more than rose to the challenge. But in between their GAs on NFL members, and DYKs on various athletes (did you know that Olympian judokan Valentin Houinato, from 
Benin, is also a journalist?), they also substantially expanded or created articles on three different politicians! One of those politicians being current Prime Minister of 
Equatorial Guinea, Manuel Osa Nsue Nsua.
While we're learning so many cool things, let me tell you all how our coverage of 
Kiribati improved so much. @Thebiguglyalien is responsible for five of our new Kiribati-themed good articles, and all four of its DYK appearances. And did you know how they got all those DYK appearances in just one hook? Find out for yourself here!
In a similar vein, if India placed so high, it's only because of dedicated writers like @Magentic Manifestations, who made India-related articles about a wide array of topics, from dairy engineers to crocodile trusts, into some Good-capital-G Articles.
And while I may not have focused on reviews too much, I am going to take a minute to highlight the contributions of our most prolific reviewer, @Simongraham. They wrote Good Articles on seven different species and genuses of arthropods (mostly jumping spiders, from what it seems), and two different USSR ships. Those with arachnophobia beware, but those who create species stubs, be even warier, for this is the type of editor we all wish we had more of.
Hopefully all the spider-phobes haven't left by now, because who isn't going to love this next topic? That's right, who wants to read about chocolate? @Yue managed to write three articles on chocolate production, chocolate smuggling, and a chocolate manufacturer, and they even made one into a Good Article. But they didn't stop there! Those of you interested in the flags of the world, you need look no further than their new Good Articles on the flags of 
Togo, 
North Korea, 
São Tomé and Príncipe, or 
Rwanda.
This Wikicup may not have seen many - or, actually, any Good Topics, but one user came close: @Chipmunkdavis! They wrote five Good Articles about fisheries in the 
Philippines, after finding out just how lacking we were. Generalissima's been prodding them to turn the entire thing into a Good Topic. And who knows, hopefully she'll have convinced them by next year? No pressure or anything, but all eyes are on you now, Chipmunkdavis!
@Di (they-them) did what they do best and told us all about the time "that German officials exiled the 
Samoan king from his own kingdom". In light of the recent Olympics, @Riley1012 helped to expand our coverage of artistic gymnasts from around the world. @TheNuggeteer brought you coverage of Philippines storms, @Averageuntitleduser wrote Good Articles on 
important Haitian women, and @Cambalachero proved that you can write 
a Good Article on pop-culture topics after all! @PerfectSoundWhatever introduced us to the life and works of 
Kenyan musician KMRU, @Noorullah21wrote an impressive 1k+ word GA on the Khalji Revolution, and @Skyshifter got meta and treated us to hoax article! As in, 
a good article about a hoax article. You'll just have to read it for yourself. @Fritzmann2002 specialised in article and list reviews, but took the time to write some good articles on 
plants from Syria and 
Turkey.
Some of us were busy during the contest, however- but in a drive such as this, literally every attempt counts. With that in mind, let's take some time to appreciate @Sohom Datta's review of a GA about voting in India, @TappyTurtle's review of the article about the Wikipedia hoax, @Zanahary review of an article about an Indian god of war, @SunTunnels's article about a 
South African speed-climber, and @Queen of Hearts's article on 
a crab named after a League of Legends character.
I'd also like to say thank you to our lovely co-ordinators, Sawyer777, Ixtal, and TechnoSquirrel69. It may sound cheesy, but it's true- none of this would have happened without your ideas and dedication.
Discuss this story