User:Omrika/sandbox/QIP/Quantum phase estimation

< User:Omrika‎ | sandbox‎ | QIP

Quantum phase estimation algorithm is a quantum algorithm used as a subroutine in several applications such as order finding, factoring and discrete logarithm.[1]: 131 

This algorithm makes it possible to estimate the phase that a unitary transformation adds to one of its eigenvectors.

The problem

edit

Let U be a unitary operator that operates on m qubits with an eigenvector  , such that  .

We would like to find the eigenvalue  of  , which in this case is equivalent to estimating the phase  , to a finite level of precision.

The algorithm

edit
 
Quantum phase estimation circuit

Setup

edit

The input consists of two registers (namely, two parts): the upper   qubits comprise the first register, and the lower   qubits are the second register.

Create superposition

edit

The initial state of the system is  . After applying n-bit Hadamard gate operation  , the state of the first register can be described as  .

Apply controlled unitary operations

edit

As mentioned above, if   is a unitary operator and   is an eigenvector of   then  , thus  .

  is a controlled-U gate which applies the unitary operator   on the second register only if its corresponding control bit (from the first register) is  .

After applying all the   controlled operations   with  , as seen in the figure, the state of the first register can be described as  .

Applying inverse Quantum Fourier transform on   yields  .

The state of both registers together is  .

Phase approximation representation

edit

We would like to approximate  's value by rounding   to the nearest integer  .

Consider   where   is an integer and the difference is  .

We can now write the state of the first and second register in the following way  .


Measurement

edit

Performing a measurement in the computational basis on the first register yields

 .


If the approximation is precise   then   meaning we will measure the accurate value of the phase with probability of one.[2]: 157 [3]: 347  The state of the system after the measurement is  . [1]: 223 

Otherwise, since   the series above converges and we measure the correct approximated value of   with some probability larger than 0.

Analysis

edit

In case we only approximate  's value  , it is guaranteed that the algorithm will yield the correct result with a probability  .

First, recall the trigonometric identity  .

Second, within  's range  , the inequalities   and   holds for all  .

Following the above  . [2]: 157 [3] : 348 

See also

edit

References

edit
  1. ^ a b Chuang, Michael A. Nielsen & Isaac L. (2001). Quantum computation and quantum information (Repr. ed.). Cambridge [u.a.]: Cambridge Univ. Press. ISBN 978-0521635035.
  2. ^ a b Benenti, Guiliano; Strini, Giulio Casati, Giuliano (2004). Principles of quantum computation and information (Reprinted. ed.). New Jersey [u.a.]: World Scientific. ISBN 978-9812388582.{{cite book}}: CS1 maint: multiple names: authors list (link)
  3. ^ a b Cleve, R.; Ekert, A.; Macchiavello, C.; Mosca, M. (8 January 1998). "Quantum algorithms revisited". Proceedings of the Royal Society A: Mathematical, Physical and Engineering Sciences. 454 (1969). doi:10.1098/rspa.1998.0164.
  • Kitaev, A. Yu. (1995). "Quantum measurements and the Abelian Stabilizer Problem". arXiv:quant-ph/9511026.