Template talk:Template link/Archive 2
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 |
Did the move operation just break this template across wikipedia?
I'm seeing usages across various project pages being interrupted by massive redirect banners suddenly. BlackholeWA (talk) 22:24, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- @BlackholeWA: This is because Anthony Appleyard (talk · contribs) renamed the template but didn't fix consequent double redirects. I've fixed them now. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 22:44, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
- @Redrose64 and BlackholeWA: Thanks, sorry. I will remember what to do next time. Sorry. Anthony Appleyard (talk) 00:57, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
Edit request to complete TfD nomination
This edit request to Template:Template link has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Template:Template link has been listed at Templates for discussion (nomination), but was protected so could not be tagged. Please add:
{{subst:tfm|help=off|1=Tlu}}
to the top of the page to complete the nomination. Thank you. JsfasdF252 (talk) 17:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done Primefac (talk) 17:27, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- I find the TfM link extremely distracting. This template is used in more than 6 million pages while {{Tlu}} in 11K. (See?) Please change
|type=tiny
to|type=disabled
. Nardog (talk) 19:59, 18 March 2021 (UTC) - This is so ridiculous it cracks me up:
- Nardog (talk) 20:12, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Primefac: This is extremely distracting. Mind removing the TfM template and acting in consequence, maybe suggesting an RfC instead? RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 22:57, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- Done RandomCanadian, that's not how this works. Disabling the notice, sure. Why the heck would we ignore every procedure we have and have a month-long discussion (i.e. RFC) when TFD works perfectly fine? That is a rhetorical question and does not need answering, but I would please ask that you strike your pointless opposition at the TFD itself. Primefac (talk) 23:03, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- I was just echoing the suggestion of somebody else at that discussion. Anyway now resolved. RandomCanadian (talk / contribs) 23:09, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
- @Primefac: Thanks! Can you also remove the space between
|text=yes}}}}
and{{
? It puts the line in<pre>...</pre>
if used at the beginning of a line. Nardog (talk) 23:08, 18 March 2021 (UTC)
Nowiki stopped working
Protected edit request on 16 March 2022
This edit request to Template:Tl has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
removed protection from Template:Template link [edit=all] (indefinite) [move=all] (Low Traffic Page) Hatta2 (talk) 06:43, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
- Not done: it's not clear what changes you want to be made. Please mention the specific changes in a "change X to Y" format and provide a reliable source if appropriate. Primefac (talk) 07:53, 16 March 2022 (UTC)
Edit request 11 December 2022
This edit request has been answered. Set the |answered= or |ans= parameter to no to reactivate your request. |
Regarding some text in the /doc subpage:
I believe based on the grammar and spacing that it should be "<something> and <something> are not interchangeable"; as is it's very strange. Maybe the entire text following and including the colon should just be deleted?
Diff:
− | This is not true for all such visually confusing templates containing a possible 1/l mix-up | + | This is not true for all such visually confusing templates containing a possible 1/l mix-up. |
CharredShorthand (talk) 08:50, 11 December 2022 (UTC)
- First off, you could have edited the /doc yourself, as it is not fully-protected. Second, I have not done what you suggested, but rather reworded to
a possible 1/l mix-up as they are not interchangeable
because it makes explicit that you can't just sub in a 1 for an l in templates. Primefac (talk) 09:38, 11 December 2022 (UTC)- @Primefac: facepalm you're right, I could have edited the doc. Whoops. Sorry! (And thanks for the fix.) CharredShorthand (talk) 13:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- No worries; you aren't the first and likely will not be the last ;-) Primefac (talk) 17:29, 13 December 2022 (UTC)
- @Primefac: facepalm you're right, I could have edited the doc. Whoops. Sorry! (And thanks for the fix.) CharredShorthand (talk) 13:49, 13 December 2022 (UTC)