Template:Did you know nominations/William E. Bradley, Jr.

The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 20:15, 18 November 2014 (UTC)

William E. Bradley, Jr. edit

Created by Lagrange613 (talk). Self nominated at 18:14, 15 November 2014 (UTC).

  • Length, date, and QPQ are all fine, but I'm a little concerned about the hook matching what is stated in the article. The hook says "only a few months into his term", while the article says "shortly after" his October appointment. Aside from the fact that both of these assertions advocate somewhat of a point of view (whose definition of "shortly" or "a few months" are we using?), there is a potential disconnect between these two statements. I think being more precise in both the article and the hook would be beneficial here (he was replaced in May 1953, but is that when he resigned? Because six months is arguably neither "shortly after" or "a few months into") and would resolve any ambiguity. Once this is resolved, though, it should be good to go. Canadian Paul 03:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
How about "less than a year"? Lagrange613 21:04, 16 November 2014 (UTC)
Had I not been as tired as I was, I probably would have just suggested that myself, haha. Good to go for DYK now. Canadian Paul 21:33, 17 November 2014 (UTC)