The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 07:13, 4 December 2019 (UTC)

WTKL

  • Reviewed: Melissa Leilani Larson
  • Comment: I am awaiting scans of some 20 articles from the SMU/UMass Dartmouth student newspaper through their library, which I requested this past Tuesday. (There is an online index but articles are not digitized.) As such a new hook may be proposed once their content is incorporated.

Converted from a redirect by Raymie (talk). Self-nominated at 01:40, 13 October 2019 (UTC).

  • New enough, long enough, well written. @Raymie: A few small changes would be good too: Take Don Dread out of quotation marks. Do you know why the application took ten years to be approved? A brief explanation of who approved it might be nice. The hook is OK (though I'd change "by" to "of", and "into" to "in") - but it raises the question of what smaller forays were in the region previously. QPQ, copyvio are fine. If you add more to the page or change hook let me know. Hameltion (talk, contribs) 21:58, 25 October 2019 (UTC)
  • There was a competing application for the frequency that was mutually exclusive and it hung in comparative limbo for years. Most of that information would belong in WNPN, though. I did make the other minor suggested changes. Raymie (tc) 22:41, 25 October 2019 (UTC)