Wikipedia

Template:Did you know nominations/Sumitra Bhave–Sunil Sukthankar

< Template:Did you know nominations
The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Cwmhiraeth (talk) 05:22, 16 June 2017 (UTC)

DYK toolbox

Sumitra Bhave–Sunil Sukthankar, Doghi, Vastupurush, Devrai, Samhita (film), Astu, Kaasav, National Film Award for Best Feature Film, National Film Award for Best Screenplay, National Film Award for Best Film on Other Social Issues, National Film Award for Best Film on Environment Conservation/Preservation edit

( Back to T:TDYK )
( Article history links:
)

Created/expanded by Vivvt (talk) and Dharmadhyaksha (talk). Nominated by Vivvt (talk) at 12:07, 9 May 2017 (UTC).

  • Doghi: New article (moved to mainspace) at time of nomination, long enough, Earwig's detector indicates a large section of the plot summary seems to be copy-pasted from IMDB. No other policy issues.
  • Well, this is a news to me! The archived version of IMDB page here shows no plot. Since I added plot here and a further edits here and here, it has become word to word copy. I never done such a blatant copy in my 28000+ edits so this is really shocking. But I cannot prove that IMDB copied this text as is as I have no way to find out their working. Let me know if you want to assume good faith here or you still find this objectionable. I will remove the complete plot section in that case as I am in no mood to rewrite it just for the sake of DYK. Let me know. - Vivvt (Talk) 19:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
  • The archive link for the IMDB page is very helpful, thank you. I knew that IMDB was editable, but the timeline seems to strongly suggest that your description was added to IMDB as opposed to the other way around. I'll assume good faith on this. If someone else has an issue, the plot section could be removed or turned into the stub without making the article too short. I think this is fine though. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
  • National Film Award for Best Film on Other Social Issues: 5x expansion at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • Vastupurush: New article (moved to mainspace) at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • Devrai: Just shy of 5x expansion by my rough count, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • This revision dated 12 June 2016 had 886 B (152 words) "readable prose size". I started editing on 7 May 2017 and by end of 9 May 2017, the page has 4442 B (724 words) "readable prose size" which is 12 characters higher than 5x. So a bit more than expected. I hope that qualifies. - Vivvt (Talk) 19:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
  • I must have made a mistake in my earlier count then. Checking this again verifies your count. Good to go. IronGargoyle (talk) 01:13, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
  • National Film Award for Best Film on Environment Conservation/Preservation: 5x expansion at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • Samhita (film): New article (moved to mainspace) at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • Astu: New article (moved to mainspace) at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • National Film Award for Best Screenplay: 5x expansion at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • Kaasav: New article (moved to mainspace) at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • National Film Award for Best Feature Film: 5x expansion at time of nomination, long enough. This gets a high score on Earwig, but in this case it seems to be because someone included the list of NFA citations on a separate Quora page. I believe they are fair use of textual material here. No other policy issues.
  • Sumitra Bhave–Sunil Sukthankar: New article (moved to mainspace) at time of nomination, long enough, and no copyvio or other policy issues.
  • Hook review: Hook facts are all verified to inline citation in their respective articles. The hook is interesting. While it is over 200 characters, it fits the criteria laid out in the multi-hook exception.
  • In the process of creating a step-by-step review of each article. Please bear with me. IronGargoyle (talk) 21:00, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Initial review of all articles, hook, and QPQ done. Most articles are good, some need work, and there should be at least a couple more QPQs. IronGargoyle (talk) 23:24, 9 June 2017 (UTC)
  • @IronGargoyle: I will give you three more hooks in replacement of Fremlin's Brewery, François Bott, and Elvis González Valencia (one remaining article) - Vivvt (Talk) 19:22, 10 June 2017 (UTC)
  • Thanks for your extensive review. I really appreciate it.- Vivvt (Talk) 19:01, 11 June 2017 (UTC)
Retrieved from "https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Template:Did_you_know_nominations/Sumitra_Bhave–Sunil_Sukthankar&oldid=785918598"