Template:Did you know nominations/Steve Crosby

The following discussion is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.

The result was: promoted by Crisco 1492 (talk) 02:56, 19 September 2011 (UTC)

Steve Crosby edit

  • Reviewed: With less than 5 DYK credits, claiming exemption for reviewing another article.

Created/expanded by Bagumba (talk). Self nom at 09:36, 16 September 2011 (UTC)

Hook review
Format Citation Neutrality Interest
StAnselm (talk) Not according to the wording used. StAnselm (talk) Some balance has been attempted, but still focusing on a negative aspect of the subject. StAnselm (talk) U.S.-focused, but interesting StAnselm (talk)


Article review
Length Newness Adequate
citations
Formatted
citations
Reliable
sources
Neutrality Plagiarism
StAnselm (talk) StAnselm (talk) StAnselm (talk) StAnselm (talk) StAnselm (talk) StAnselm (talk) StAnselm (talk)


  • The hook is too negative for a BLP. The source actually says "by some measures" or "arguably", so that needs to be changed, but I would prefer to see another hook. Everything else is fine. StAnselm (talk) 00:59, 17 September 2011 (UTC)
Yes, that's much better and I'm happy with the alternate hook. I note that "developed" does not appear in the article (since the hook is a synthesis of a number of facts) but I think it is justifiable from the context. StAnselm (talk) 06:55, 17 September 2011 (UTC)