- The following is an archived discussion of the DYK nomination of the article below. Please do not modify this page. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as this nomination's talk page, the article's talk page or Wikipedia talk:Did you know), unless there is consensus to re-open the discussion at this page. No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was: promoted by Hawkeye7 (talk) 21:56, 28 May 2014 (UTC)
| DYK toolbox |
|---|
Sleepify edit
- ... that a band attempted to fund a free concert tour through royalty payments from an album of silence on Spotify?
ALT1:... that a Spotify spokesperson jokingly criticized "Sleepify" for being a "derivative of John Cage's work"?- ALT2:... that it was estimated that a band had accumulated at least $20,000 in royalty payments from an album of silence on Spotify?
- Reviewed: Parada Równości
Created by ViperSnake151 (talk). Self nominated at 04:47, 9 May 2014 (UTC).
QPQ is met. No copyright violations or too-close paraphrasing. The article is suitably lengthy, the date is okay, and the referencing is thorough, with at least one reference per paragraph in the article body. Online sources confirm every aspect of every hook, here and in the article. The first hook is suitable, if one wanted to have a sort of puzzler DYK entry. The ALT1 hook is somewhat iffy because we don't really know what the attitude was of the Spotify spokesperson. Was it joking? (I think it was.) Was it criticism? (I doubt it.) I also don't like the hidden piped link to John Cage's 4'33", and there's some guideline (can't find it now) that deprecates wikilinks within direct quotes. The ALT2 hook is just as suitable as the first hook. So I'm recommending this go ahead with either the original hook or the ALT2 hook. Binksternet (talk) 23:12, 27 May 2014 (UTC)
